Do we always measure the same? on measurement invariance and response shift in rehabilitation research - Part 2;Messen wir immer das Gleiche? Zur Invarianz von Messungen und Response-Shift in der Rehabilitation - Teil 2

Rehabilitation (Germany)

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 415-423

  Jelitte, M ^a   Schuler, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

confirmatory factor analysis; health related quality of life; measurement invariance; response shift

Indexed keywords

GERMANY; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GERMANY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84871231112     PISSN: 00343536     EISSN: 14391309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1295447     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Schuler M., Jelitte M. Messen wir bei allen Personen das Gleiche? Zur Invarianz von Messungen und Response Shift in der Rehabilitation - Teil 1. Rehabilitation (im Druck)
2. Sprangers M. A., Schwartz C. E. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med: 1999; 48 1507 1515
3. Meade A. W., Lautenschlager G. J., Hecht J. E. Establishing measurement equivalence and invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. International Journal of Testing: 2005; 5 279 300
4. Bullinger M., Kirchberger I. SF-36, Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen u.a. Hogrefe: 1998
5. Maurischat C., Krüger-Bödecker A. Analysen zum Strukturmodell des SF-36/SF-12 - eine Übersicht. In: Maurischat C., Morfeld M., Kohlmann T., Bullinger M. Hrsg Lebensqualität: Nützlichkeit und Psychometrie des Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Lengerich Pabst: 2004; 29 48
6. Bullinger M., Morfeld M. Der Health Survey SF-36/SF-12: Darstellung und Entwicklungen. In: Maurischat C., Morfeld M., Kohlmann T., Bullinger M. Hrsg Lebensqualität: Nützlichkeit und Psychometrie des Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Lengerich Pabst: 2004; 15 28
7. Oort F. J. Types of change in self-report data: definition, interpretation, and operationalization. In: Van Dijkum C., Blasius J., Kleijr H., von Hilten B. Hrsg Recent Developments and Applications in Social Research Methodology. Amsterdam SISWO: 2004; 1 21
8. Güthlin C. Response Shift: Alte Probleme der Verä nderungsmessung, neu angewendet auf gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie. 2004; 13 165 174
9. Gibbons F. X. Social comparison as a mediator of response shift. Soc Sci Med: 1999; 48 1517 1530
10. Schwartz C. E., Sprangers MA G. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med: 1999; 48 1531 1548
11. O'Boyle C. A., McGee H. M., Browne J. P. Measuring response shift using the Schedule for Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life. In: Schwartz CESMAG, Hrsg. Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research. Washington, DC American Psychological Association: 2000; 123 136
12. Oort F. J. Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research: 2005; 14 587 598
13. Ahmed S., Bourbeau J., Maltais F. et al. The Oort structural equation modeling approach detected a response shift after a COPD self-management program not detected by the Schmitt technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2009; 62 1165 1172
14. Ahmed S., Mayo N. E., Wood-Dauphinee S. et al. The structural equation modeling technique did not show a response shift, contrary to the results of the then test and the individualized approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2005; 58 1125 1133
15. Oort F. J., Visser M. R., Sprangers M. A. An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Quality of Life Research: 2005; 14 599 609
16. Widaman K. F., Ferrer E., Conger R. D. Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Dev Perspect: 2010; 4 10 18
17. Bühner M. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 2 Aufl. München Pearson Education Deutschland: 2006
18. Hu L-T, Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: 1999; 6 1 55
19. Bollen K. A. Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford John Wiley & Sons: 1989
20. Arbuckle J. L. AMOS 17.0 User's Guide. Chicago, IL SPSS: 2008
21. Meade A. W., Johnson E. C., Braddy P. W. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology: 2008; 93 568 592
22. Byrne B. M., Shavelson R. J., Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin: 1989; 105 456 466
23. Millsap R. E., Kwok O. M. Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods: 2004; 9 93 115
24. Gregorich S. E. Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care: 2006; 44 S78 S94
25. Steenkamp J-BE, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research: 1998; 25 78 90
26. Igl W., Zwingmann C., Faller H. Änderungssensitivität. Rehabilitation: 2005; 44 100 106
27. Schwartz C. E., Rapkin B. D. Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health Qual Life Outcomes: 2004; 2 16
28. Sharpe L., Curran L. Understanding the process of adjustment to illness. Soc Sci Med: 2006; 62 1153 1166
29. Folkman S., Greer S. Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other. Psychooncology: 2000; 9 11 19
30. Carver C. S., Scheier M. F. Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: understanding 'response shift' phenomena. Soc Sci Med: 2000; 50 1715 1722
31. Schmitt N., Kuljanin G. Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review: 2008; 18 210 222
32. Oort F. J., Visser M. R., Sprangers M. A. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2009; 62 1126 1137
33. King-Kallimanis B. L., Oort F. J., Visser M. R. et al. Structural equation modeling of health-related quality-of-life data illustrates the measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2009; 62 1157 1164
34. Nolte S., Elsworth G. R., Sinclair A. J. et al. Tests of measurement invariance failed to support the application of the "then-test" Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2009; 62 1173 1180
35. MacCallum R. C., Roznowski M., Mar C. M. et al. Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research: 1994; 29 1 32
36. Millsap R. E., Meredith W. Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In: Cudeck R., MacCallum R. Hrsg Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum: 2007; 131 152
37. Schwartz C. E., Sprangers M. A. Reflections on genes and sustainable change: toward a trait and state conceptualization of response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: 2009; 62 1118 1123
38. Schwartz C. E., Bode R., Repucci N. et al. The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: A meta-analysis of response shift. Quality of Life Research: 2006; 15 1533 1550
39. Norman G. Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Quality of Life Research: 2003; 12 239 249
40. Schwartz C. E., Sprangers M. A. Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest. Quality of life research: 2010; 19 455 464
41. Jelitte M. Untersuchung von Response-Shift-Einflüssen auf die Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualitat bei Prostatakrebspatienten in der onkologischen Rehabilitation. Dissertation. Universität Koblenz-Landau, Fachbereich Psychologie: 2010; 348
42. Barclay-Goddard R., Epstein J. D., Mayo N. E. Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities. Quality of Life Research: 2009; 18 335 346
43. Terwee C. B., Dekker F. W., Wiersinga W. M. et al. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of life research: 2003; 12 349 362