A point to segment contact formulation for isogeometric, NURBS based finite elements

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 255, Issue , 2013, Pages 27-39

  Matzen, M E ^a   Cichosz, T ^a   Bischoff, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collocation method; Contact mechanics; NURBS

Indexed keywords

BASIS FUNCTIONS; COLLOCATION METHOD; CONTACT MECHANICS; CONTACT PROBLEM; FINITE ELEMENT; LAGRANGE POLYNOMIALS; LARGE SLIDING; NON-CONTACT; NON-SMOOTH; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; NURBS; STANDARD FINITE ELEMENT; STRUCTURAL MECHANICS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM;

DEFORMATION;

STRESS CONCENTRATION;

EID: 84871140501     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Hughes T., Taylor R., Kanoknukulchai W. A finite element method for large displacement contact and impact problems. Formulations and Computational Algorithms in Finite Element Analysis: U.S.- Germany Symposium 1977, 468-495. MIT, Cambridge. K. Bathe, J. Oden, W. Wunderlich (Eds.).
2. J.O. Hallquist, Nike2D: an implicit, finite deformation, finite element code for analyzing the static and dynamic response of two-dimensional solids, Tech. Rep. UCRL-52678, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, 1979.
3. Bathe K., Chaudhary A. A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1985, 21:65-88.
4. Hallquist J., Goudreau G., Benson D. Sliding interfaces with contact-impact in large-scale lagrange computations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1985, 51:107-137.
5. Wriggers P., Simo J. A note on tangent stiffness for fully nonlinear contact problems. Commun. Appl. Numer. Methods 1985, 1:199-203.
6. Wriggers P., Van T., Stein E. Finite element formulation of large deformation impact-contact problems with friction. Comput. Struct. 1990, 37:319-333.
7. Laursen T., Simo J. A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multibody, large deformation-frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1993, 36:3451-3485.
8. Simo J., Wriggers P., Taylor R. A perturbed lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1985, 50:163-180.
9. Papadopoulos P., Taylor R. A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992, 94:373-389.
10. Papadopoulos P., Taylor R. A simple algorithm for three-dimensional finite element analysis of contact problems. Comput. Struct. 1993, 46:1107-1118.
11. Zavarise G., Wriggers P. A segment-to-segment contact strategy. Math. Comput. Model. 1998, 28:497-515.
12. El-Abbasi N., Bathe K. Stability and patch test performance of contact discretizations and a new solution algorithm. Comput. Struct. 2001, 79:1473-1486.
13. C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, A. Patera, Domain decomposition by the mortar element method, in: H. Kasper, M. Garby (Eds.), Asymptotic and Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations with Critical Parameters: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Asymptotic-Induced Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Critical Parameters, and Domain Decomposition, Science Series C, vol. 384, 25-28 May 1993, Beaune, Frankreich, NATO, 1993, pp. 269-286.
14. C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, A. Patera, A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method, in: H. Brezis, J. Lions (Eds.), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications, Collége de France Seminar, vol. 12, 1994, pp. 13-51.
15. Ben Belgacem F., Hild P., Laborde P. The mortar finite element method for contact problems. Math. Comput. Model. 1998, 28:263-271.
16. Ben Belgacem F. Numerical simulation of some variational inequalities arisen from unilateral contact problems by the finite element methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2000, 37:1198-1216.
17. Wohlmuth B., Krause R. Monotone multigrid methods on nonmatching grids for nonlinear multibody contact problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2003, 25:324-347.
18. McDewitt T., Laursen T. A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2000, 48:1525-1547.
19. Yang B., Laursen T., Meng X. Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2005, 62:1183-1225.
20. Puso M., Laursen T. A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2004, 193:601-629.
21. Fischer K., Wriggers P. Frictionless 2D contact formulation for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Comput. Mech. 2005, 36:226-244.
22. Wohlmuth B. A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the lagrange multiplier. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2000, 38:989-1012.
23. Wohlmuth B. Discretization Methods and Iterative Solvers Based on Domain Decomposition. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 2001, vol. 17. Springer, Berlin.
24. Hüeber S., Wohlmuth B. A primal-dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2005, 194:3147-3166.
25. Hartmann S., Brunssen S., Ramm E., Wohlmuth B. Unilateral non-linear dynamic contact of thin-walled structures using a primal-dual active set strategy. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2007, 70:883-912.
26. Hartmann S., Ramm E. A mortar based contact formulation for non-linear dynamics using dual lagrange multipliers. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2008, 44:245-258.
27. Popp A., Gee M., Wall W. A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal-dual active set strategy. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2009, 79:1354-1391.
28. Cichosz T., Bischoff M. Consistent treatment of boundaries with mortar contact formulations using dual lagrange multipliers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011, 200:1317-1332.
29. Padmanabhan V., Laursen T. A framework for development of surface smoothing procedures in large deformation frictional contact analysis. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2001, 37:173-198.
30. Wriggers P., Krstulović-Opara L., Korelc J. Smooth c1-interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2001, 51:1469-1495.
31. Puso M., Laursen T. A 3d contact smoothing method using Gregory patches. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2002, 54:1161-1194.
32. Konyukhov A., Schweizerhof K. Incorporation of contact for high-order finite elements in covariant form. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2009, 198:1213-1223.
33. Hughes T., Cottrell J., Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2005, 194:4135-4195.
34. Temizer I., Wriggers P., Hughes T. Contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011, 200:1100-1112.
35. Lu J. Isogeometric contact analysis: geometric basis and formulation for frictionless contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011, 200:726-741.
36. M. Matzen, 2D NURBS Kollokations-Kontaktformulierung, Master's Thesis, Arbeit Nr. 10/03, Institut für Baustatik, Universität Stuttgart, 2010.
37. Zavarise G., De Lorenzis L. A modified node-to-segment algorithm passing the contact patch test. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2009, 79:379-416.
38. Zavarise G., De Lorenzis L. The node-to-segment algorithm for 2d frictionless contact: classical formulation and special cases. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2009, 198:3428-3451.
39. Kikuchi N., Oden J. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods 1988, Siam, Philadelphia.
40. Konyukhov A., Schweizerhof K. On the solvability of closest point projection procedures in contact analysis: analysis and solution strategy for surfaces of arbitrary geometry. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 197:3045-3056.
41. Konyukhov A., Schweizerhof K. Covariant Description for Frictional Contact Problems 2004, Springer.
42. de Boor C. On calculation with b-splines. J. Approx. Theory 1972, 6:50-62.
43. De Lorenzis L., Temizer í., Wriggers P., Zavarise G. A large deformation frictional contact formulation using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2011, 87:1278-1300.
44. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics 2002, Wiley, Chichester.
45. Auricchio F., Beiraõ da Veiga L., Hughes T., Reali A., Sangalli G. Isogeometic collocation methods. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 2010, 20:2075.
46. Auricchio F., Beiraõ da Veiga L., Hughes T., Reali A., Sangalli G. Isogeometric collocation for elastostatics and explicit dynamics. Comput Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2012, 249-252:2-14.
47. Beiraõ da Veiga L., Lovadina C., Reali A. Avoiding shear locking for the Timoshenko beam problem via isogeometric collocation methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2012, 38-51.
48. Demko S. On the existence of interpolating projections onto spline spaces. J. Approx. Theory 1985, 43:151-156.
49. Jator S., Sinkala Z. A high order b-spline collocation method for linear boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 191:100-116.
50. Botella O. On a collocation method for the solution of Navier-Stokes equations. Comput. Fluids 2002, 31:397-420.
51. Boor C.d. A Practical Guide to Splines 1994, Springer.
52. Sederberg T.W., Zheng J., Bakenov A., Nasri A. T-splines and t-NURCCs. ACM Trans. Graph. 2003, 22:477-484.
53. Bazilevs Y., Calo V., Cottrell J., Evans J., Hughes T., Lipton S., Scott M., Sederberg T. Isogeometric analysis using t-splines. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2010, 199:229-263.
54. Höllig K. Finite Element Methods with B-Splines 1987, SIAM.
55. Vuong A.-V., Giannelli C., Jttler B., Simeon B. A hierarchical approach to adaptive local refinement in isogeometric analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011, 200:3554-3567.
56. D. Schillinger, L. Ded, M.A. Scott, J.A. Evans, M.J. Borden, E. Rank, T.J. Hughes, An isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and t-spline CAD surfaces, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. (2012), submitted for publication.
57. Kleiss S.K., Jüttler B., Zulehner W. Enhancing isogeometric analysis by a finite element-based local refinement strategy. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2012, 213-216:168-182.