A mortar based contact formulation for non-linear dynamics using dual Lagrange multipliers

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 245-258

  Hartmann, S ^a   Ramm, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active set strategy; Dual Lagrange multipliers; Implicit dynamic contact; Large deformations; Mortar finite element method

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; MESH GENERATION; SET THEORY; STATIC ANALYSIS;

ACTIVE SET STRATEGIES; BIORTHOGONALITY; DEFORMATION CONTACT PROBLEMS; DUAL LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; GENERALIZED ENERGY MOMENTUM METHOD; IMPLICIT DYNAMIC CONTACTS; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; NODAL DECOUPLING; NODAL DISPLACEMENTS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 40249091458     PISSN: 0168874X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2007.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hughes T., Taylor R., and Kanoknukulchai W. A finite element method for large displacement contact and impact problems. In: Bathe K. (Ed). Formulations and Computational Algorithms in FE Analysis (1977), MIT Press, Boston 468-495
2. J. Hallquist, An implicit, finite-deformation, finite element code for analysing the static and dynamic response of two-dimensional solids, Technical Report UCRL-52678, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1979.
3. Hallquist J., Goudreau G., and Benson D. Sliding interfaces with contact-impact in large-scale Lagrangian computations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 51 (1985) 107-137
4. Wriggers P., Vu Van T., and Stein E. Finite element formulation of large deformation impact-contact problems with friction. Comput. Struct. 37 (1990) 319-331
5. Benson D., and Hallquist J. A single surface contact algorithm for the post-buckling analysis of shell structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng 78 (1990) 141-163
6. T. Laursen, Formulation and treatment of frictional contact problems using finite elements, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical Report No. 92-6, Stanford University, USA, 1992.
7. Papadopoulos P., and Taylor R. A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 94 (1992) 373-389
8. R. Taylor, P. Wriggers, Smooth surface discretization for large deformation frictionless contact, Technical Report UCB/SEMM-99-04, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
9. Padmanabhan V., and Laursen T. A framework for development of surface smoothing procedures in large deformation fricitional contact analysis. Finite Elements Anal. Des. 37 (2001) 173-198
10. Wriggers P., Krstulovic-Opera L., and Korelc J. Smooth c1-interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 51 (2001) 1469-1495
11. Puso M., and Laursen T. A 3d contact smoothing method using gregory patches. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 54 (2002) 1161-1194
12. Stadler M., and Holzapfel G. Subdivision schemes for smooth contact surfaces of arbitrary mesh topology in 3d. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 60 (2004) 1161-1195
13. Simo J., Wriggers P., and Taylor R. A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 50 (1985) 163-180
14. Zavarise G., and Wriggers P. A segment-to-segment contact strategy. Math. Comput. Modelling 28 (1998) 497-515
15. Bernardi C., Debit N., and Maday Y. Coupling finite elements and spectral methods: first results. Math. Comput. 54 (1990) 21-39
16. Bernardi C., Maday Y., and Patera A. Domain decomposition by the mortar element method. In: Kasper H., and Garby M. (Eds). Asymptotic and Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations with Critical Parameters (1993), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands 269-286
17. Bernardi C., Maday Y., and Patera A. A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. In: Brezis H., and Lions J. (Eds). Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications-Collège de France Seminar vol. XI (1994), Longman, Harlow 13-51
18. Belgacem F., Hild P., and Laborde P. The mortar finite element method for contact problems. Math. Comput. Modelling 28 (1998) 263-271
19. Hild P. Numerical implementation of two nonconforming finite element methods for unilateral contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 184 (2000) 99-123
20. Wohlmuth B., and Krause R. Monotone methods on non-matching grids for non linear contact problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (2003) 324-347
21. Hüeber S., and Wohlmuth B. A primal-dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (2005) 3147-3166
22. Yang B., Laursen T., and Meng X. Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 62 (2005) 1183-1225
23. Puso M., and Laursen T. A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 193 (2004) 601-629
24. Puso M., and Laursen T. A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 193 (2004) 4891-4913
25. McDevitt T., and Laursen T. A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 48 (2000) 1525-1547
26. Fischer K., and Wriggers P. Frictionless 2d contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Comput. Mech. 36 (2005) 226-244
27. Fischer K., and Wriggers P. Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2005) 5020-5036
28. Wohlmuth B. A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the Lagrange multiplier. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000) 989-1012
29. Alart P., and Curnier A. A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 92 (1991) 353-375
30. Christensen P., Klarbring A., Pang J., and Strömberg N. Formulation and comparison of algorithms for frictional contact problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42 (1998) 145-173
31. Hintermüller M., Ito K., and Kunisch K. The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth Newton method. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2003) 865-888
32. Hartmann S., Brunssen S., Ramm E., and Wohlmuth B. Unilateral non-linear dynamic contact of thin-walled structures using a primal-dual active set strategy. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 70 (2007) 883-912
33. Laursen T. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics (2002), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
34. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics (2002), Wiley, Chichester, UK
35. Kuhl D., and Crisfield M. Energy conserving and decaying algorithms in non-linear structural dynamics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45 (1999) 569-599
36. Kuhl D., and Ramm E. Generalized energy-momentum method for non-linear adaptive shell dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 178 (1999) 343-366
37. Newmark N. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div. Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 85 (1959) 67-94
38. Brunssen S., Schmid F., Schäfer M., and Wohlmuth B. A fast and robust iterative solver for nonlinear contact problems using a primal-dual active set strategy and algebraic multigrid. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 69 (2007) 524-543
39. T. Cichosz, Simulation von inkrementellen blechumformprozessen, Diploma Thesis, Institute of Structural Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2006.
40. Laursen T., and Love G. Improved implicit integrators for transient impact problems-geometric admissibility within the conserving framework. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 53 (2002) 245-274