Long-term outcomes of early childhood science education: Insights from a cross-national comparative case study on conceptual understanding of science

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1269-1302

  Tao, Ying ^a   Oliver, Mary ^a   Venville, Grady ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

comparative study; conceptual understanding; elementary children; science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871093823     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-012-9335-2     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J. & Huang, T. C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48-61.
2. Allen, P. J., & Bennett, K. (2008). SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. South Melbourne, Australia: Thomson.
3. Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B. & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84, 658-679.
4. Anning, A., Cullen, J. & Fleer, M. (2009). Research contexts across cultures. In A. Anning, J. Cullen & M. Fleer (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture (2nd ed., pp. 1-24). London: Sage.
5. Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493-536). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Australian Science Technology and Engineering Council (1997). Foundations for Australia's future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
7. Baddock, M. & Bucat, R. (2008). Effectiveness of a classroom chemistry demonstration using the cognitive conflict strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1115-1128.
8. Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45-68). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
9. Bliss, J. (1995). Piaget and after: The case of learning science. Studies in Science Education, 25, 139-172.
10. California Department of Education (2011). A look at kindergarten through grade 6 in California public schools. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from http://www. cde. ca. gov/ci/cr/cf/allfwks. asp.
11. Campbell, C. & Tytler, R. (2007). Views of student learning. In V. Dawson & G. Venville (Eds.), The art of teaching primary science (pp. 23-42). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
12. Cao, W. D. (2005). Thoughts of the current situation of science teaching in primary schools. Science Lesson, 2, 46 (in Chinese).
13. Chang, C. Y. & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346.
14. Chen, Q. (2004a). Reflection upon the current primary science education. Beijing Education, 7, 15-17 (in Chinese).
15. Chen, Q. (2004b). Scientific inquiry and early science education. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 10, 49-52 (in Chinese).
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
18. Curriculum Council Western Australia (1998). Curriculum framework learning statement for science. Retrieved 20 March 2009 from http://www. curriculum. wa. edu. au/internet/Years_K10/Curriculum_Framework.
19. Dawson, V. & Venville, G. (2007). The art of teaching primary science (1st ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
20. Department of Elementary Education (2008). Grade 1-9 science and technology curriculum guidelines. Retrieved 13 May 2011 from http://teach. eje. edu. tw/9CC2/9cc_97. php (in Chinese).
21. Ding, Z. Y. (1984). Congnitive development of early primary children in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 139-146.
22. Fan, Q. & Zhao, J. (2002). A survey of Chinese primary students' science literacy: A report from National Primary Science Curriculum Board. Science Lesson, 6, 16-18 (in Chinese).
23. Fensham, P. (1999). International success, but is it science? Identifying strengths and weaknesses in Australian primary school science from TIMSS and other data. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(2), 39-44.
24. Fleer, M. (1994). Determining children's understanding of electricity. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(4), 248-253.
25. Georghiades, P. (2006). The role of metacognitive activities in the contextual use of primary pupils' conceptions of science. Research in Science Education, 36, 29-49.
26. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
27. Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M. & Fuccilo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238-264.
28. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
29. Hao, J. H. (2002). Interpretations to science curriculum standards (3-6 grades) of full-time compulsory education. Wuhan: Hubei Education Press (in Chinese).
30. Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 323-337.
31. Harrison, A., Grayson, D. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55-87.
32. Hickey, R. (2007). Understanding how children learn science. In V. Dawson & G. Venville (Eds.), The art of teaching primary science (pp. 43-61). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
33. Hu, W. P., Han, Q. & Liu, J. W. (2007). Investigation into and thoughts of the current situation of the implementation of new curriculum of science in the primary schools. Theory and Practice of Education, 27(3), 58-63 (in Chinese).
34. Li, H. (2004). A brief history of primary science curriculum reform in China. Beijing: People's Education Press (in Chinese).
35. Li, Z. C. (2006). The status of science subject in primary schools. Science Lesson, 9, 38-39 (in Chinese).
36. Li, F. G. (2007a). Students' understanding of pressure: Preliminary findings. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200707/1838. html (in Chinese).
37. Li, Y. F. (2007b). Enhancing the reform of rural primary science education. Educational Science and Research, 8, 33-35 (in Chinese).
38. Liu, M. G. (1998). Study on the reform of primary nature curriculum in China. Wuhan: Hubei Education Press (in Chinese).
39. Lokan, J., Hollingsworth, H. & Hackling, M. W. (2006). Teaching science in Australia: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Retrieved 9 February 2010 from http://www. acer. edu. au/documents/TIMSS_TVidSciAujzMar06FINAL2. pdf.
40. Luo, H. J. (2006). Case study on students' understanding of floating and sinking: Preliminary findings. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200608/1737. html (in Chinese).
41. Luo, Y. W. (2006). Students' understanding of expansion and contraction. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200611/1765. html (in Chinese).
42. Luo, P., Wang, M. Y. & Liang, X. (2009). On the "force and movement" understanding of children aged 5-6 years old. Studies in Preschool Education, 11, 26-31 (in Chinese).
43. Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93-127.
44. Metz, K. E. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive developmental research and children's science curricula. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 151-163.
45. Ministry of Education (2001). An outline of curriculum reform of basic education. Journal of Subject Education, 7, 1-5 (in Chinese).
46. Moore, T. & Harrison, A. (2004). Floating and sinking: Everyday science in middle school. Paper presented at the Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
47. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Olson, J. F., Berger, D. R., Milne, D. & Stanco, G. M. (2008). TIMSS 2007 encyclopedia: A guide to mathematics and science education around the world, volume 1 A-L. Retrieved 14 May 2009 from http://timss. bc. edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/T07_Enc_V1. pdf.
48. Murcia, K. (2007). Science for the 21st century: Teaching for scientific literacy in the primary classroom. Teaching Science, 53(2), 16-19.
49. Nussbaum, J. & Novak, J. D. (1976). An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60(4), 535-550.
50. Nuthall, G. (1999). The way students learn: Acquiring knowledge from an integrated science and social studies unit. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 303-341.
51. Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O. & Mullis, I. V. S. (2008). TIMSS 2007 technical report. Retrieved 14 May 2009 from http://timss. bc. edu/TIMSS2007/techreport. html.
52. Pattie, I. & Groves, R. (1993). What do they know? The understanding of science and technology by children in their last year of primary school in Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service.
53. Perry, L. & McConney, A. (2010). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 72-85.
54. Piaget, J. (1930). The child's conception of physical causality. London: Routledge.
55. Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research-Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
56. Qu, T. H. & Wang, J. (2000). The development and enlightenment from science education in modern China. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science), 6, 89-95 (in Chinese).
57. Quek, G., Goh, K. H., Yen, Y. P., Liu, Y. M., Tan, Q. L., Chin, T. Y., et al. (2008). Singapore. TIMSS 2007 Encyclopedia: A guide to mathematics and science education around the world. Volume 2 M-Z and benchmarking participants. Retrieved 7 June 2011 from http://timss. bc. edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/T07_Enc_V2. pdf.
58. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (2011). The Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved 20 May 2011 from http://www. australiancurriculum. edu. au/Science.
59. Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. & O'Connell, A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children's immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217-235.
60. Stevenson, H. W. & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
61. Tao, Y., Oliver, M. & Venville, G. (2012). Chinese and Australian Year 3 children's conceptual understanding of science: A multiple comparative case study. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 879-901.
62. Thomson, S. (2006). Science achievement in Australia: Evidence from national and international surveys. Retrieved from http://www. acer. edu. au/research_conferences/2006. html.
63. Thomson, S., Ainley, J. & Nicholas, M. (2007). Australia. TIMSS 2007 Encyclopedia: A guide to mathematics and science education around the world, volume 1 A-L. Retrieved 14 May 2009 from http://timss. bc. edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/T07_Enc_V1. pdf.
64. Thomson, S. & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Retrieved 30 September 2010 from http://www. acer. edu. au/documents/PISA2006_Report. pdf.
65. Thomson, S. & Fleming, N. (2004). Examining the evidence: Science achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002. Retrieved 30 September 2010 from http://www. acer. edu. au/timss/data-and-reports.
66. Thomson, S., Wernert, N., Underwood, C. & Nicholas, M. (2008). TIMSS 2007: Taking a closer look at mathematics and science in Australia. Retrieved 6 October 2010 from http://www. acer. edu. au/documents/TIMSS_2007-AustraliaFullReport. pdf.
67. Tian, S. C. & Guo, Y. J. (2009). Science learning contexts in primary and secondary schools. China Education, 11, 58-60 (in Chinese).
68. Tytler, R., Prain, V. & Peterson, S. (2007). Representational issues in students learning about evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37, 313-331.
69. Venville, G. (2004). Young children learning about living things: A case study of conceptual change from ontological and social perspectives. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 449-480.
70. Venville, G. (2007). A sociocultural perspective on young children's conceptions of the moon: Two case studies from Australia. Paper presented at the 17th European Early Childhood Education Research Association Annual Conference Prague, Czech Republic.
71. Venville, G. & Donovan, J. (2007). Developing year 2 students' theory of biology with concepts of the gene and DNA. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1111-1131.
72. Venville, G., Gribble, S. J. & Donovan, J. (2005). An exploration of young children's understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89(4), 614-633.
73. Venville, G., Louisell, R., & Wilhelm, J (in press). A complex dynamic systems view of young children's knowledge about the Moon. Research in Science Education, Accepted March 6th 2011. doi: 10. 1007/s11165-011-9220-y.
74. Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535.
75. Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 123-183.
76. Wan, D. S. (2007). Students' understanding of friction: Priliminary findings. Retrieved 2 March 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200707/1842. html (in Chinese).
77. Wei, Y. (2008a). Minutes of the first board meeting on proposed national primary science curriculum. Retrieved 8 October 2008 from http://nsse. handsbrain. com/article. php/296 (in Chinese).
78. Wei, Y. (2008b). Recovering science education in primary year 1 and year 2. Retrieved 8 October 2008 from http://nsse. handsbrain. com/article. php/36 (in Chinese).
79. White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
80. Xiang, Y. H. (2006). Students' ability of controlling variables: Priliminary findings. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200610/1756. html (in Chinese).
81. Yang, H. (2004). Piaget's theory has great sense to the curriculum designing. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management (Social Science Edition), 23(5), 79-81.
82. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
83. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage Publications.
84. Yu, X. L. (1997). Piaget's theory and science education. Educational Research, 1, 66-71 (in Chinese).
85. Zhang, Q. M. (2006). Students' scientific hypotheses on lever balance. Retrieved 15 February 2009 from http://se. risechina. org/yjsy/200609/245. html (in Chinese).
86. Zhang, L. J. & Fang, F. X. (2005a). Effect of relevant training on understanding of plant reproduction in preschoolers aged 5 to 6. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(9), 579-582.
87. Zhang, L. J. & Fang, F. X. (2005b). Understanding of naive theory of biology for animal reproduction in 4-to-7-year-olds. Acta Psychological Sinica, 37(5), 613-622.
88. Zhong, Q. Q. (2002). Congnitive issues in science education. Global Education Outlook, 31(2), 6-10 (in Chinese).
89. Zhu, L. Q. & Fang, F. X. (2005). Children's understanding of aging. Acta Psychological Sinica, 37(3), 335-340.
90. Zhuang, X. Z. (2001). Piaget's stage theory and educational reform. Journal of Changzhou Teachers College of Technology, 7(3), 8-11 (in Chinese).