Agri-environment schemes: Farmers' acceptance and perception of potential 'Payment by Results' in grassland-A case study in England

Land Use Policy

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 134-144

  Schroeder, Lilli A ^a   Isselstein, Johannes ^a   Chaplin, Stephen ^b   Peel, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b NATURAL ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agri environment schemes; Common Agricultural Policy; Farmer behaviour; Farmers' acceptance; Grassland indicators; Payment by Results; Target levels

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; FARMERS ATTITUDE; GRASSLAND; PERCEPTION; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

ENGLAND; HUMBER RIVER; UNITED KINGDOM; YORKSHIRE;

EID: 84871084884     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahnström J., Höckert J., Bergea H.L., Francis C.A., Skelton P., Hallgren L. Farmers and nature conservation: what is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation?. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 2008, 24:38-47.
2. Bertke E., Kirchner C., Niens C., Tute C., Marggraf R. Agrarumweltmassnahmen in Zeiten des Klimawandels - überlegungen zu einem ergebnisoreintierten Ansatz. Schriften der Rentenbank 2010, 24:55-83.
3. Bortz, J., Döring N., 2006. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4th ed., Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg, Würzburg, 897 pp.
4. Briemle G. Ansprache und Förderung von Extensiv-Grünland - Neue Wege zum Prinzip der Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen der Landwirtschaft in Baden-Württemberg. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 2000, 32:171-175.
5. Bruckmeier K., Riegert C. Umweltgerechte Landwirtschaft in Niedersachsen. Sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchung des KATALYSE-Instituts für angewandte Umweltforschung. Köln, Germany. In: Niens, C., Marggraf, R., 2010. Handlungsempfehlungen zur Steigerung der Akzeptanz von Agrarumweltmaßnahmen - Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Landwirten und Landwirtinnen in Niedersachen. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 1996, 88(1):5-36.
6. Bühl A. SPSS 18. Einführung in die modern Datenanalyse 2010, Pearson Studium, München, 1008 pp. 12th updated ed.
7. Bultena G.L., Hoiberg E.O. Factors affecting farmers' adoption of conservation tillage. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1983, 38:281-284.
8. Burton R.J.F., Schwarz G. Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change. Land Use Policy 2013, 30:628-641.
9. Carlson, J.E., McLeod, M.E., 1977. Farmers' attitudes toward soil erosion and related farm problems in the Lewis and Idaho county wheat region. Progress Report No. 198. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA, 12 pp.
10. Defra Commentary on Yorkshire and Humber Government Office region, Defra, Crown Copyright 2010, Available from:, (accessed 04.05.12). http://www.farmbusinesssurvey.co.uk/regional/commentary/2009/yorkshirehumber.pdf.
11. Defra Farm Business Management Practices in England - Results from the 2007/08 Farm Business Survey 2010, Available from:, (accessed 01.11.11). http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/defra-stats-fbs-management-practices-100323.pdf.
12. Defra, 2011a. Farm diversification in England: results from the Farm Business Survey, 2009/10. Available from: (accessed 01.11.11). http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/defra-stats-fbs-diversification-2011.pdf.
13. Defra, 2011b. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, UK. Payments for ecosystem services. Available from: (accessed 07.02.12). http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/2011/10/13/eco-system-payment-pb13658/.
14. Defra, 2011c. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, UK. Natural Environment White Paper. Available from: (accessed 07.02.12). http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/natural/whitepaper/.
15. Doluschitz R., Grosskopf W., Kappelmann K.-H., Lenz R., Pelz S. Ex-post-Bewertung des EPLR - Baden-Württembergs 2000-2006, report of scientists of the Johann-Heinrich von Thünen Institute on behalf of the Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg 2008, 668 pp.
16. Edwards A.C., Withers P.J.A. Soil phosphorus management and water quality: a UK perspective. Soil Use and Management 1998, 14:124-130.
17. European Commission (EC) DG Agriculture, 2004. Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programmes in View of Post 2006 Rural Development Policy. Final Report. Submitted by EPEC, Brussels, 156 pp.
18. European Commission (EC) Agriculture and the Environment: Introduction - Agri-environment Measures Agriculture and Rural Development 2010, European Commission, Available from:, (accessed 18.03.10). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/index_en.htm.
19. European Commission (EC), 2011. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). COM (2011) 627 final/2. Brussels, 19.10.2011. Available from: (accessed 27.10.11). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-post-2013/legal-proposals/com627/627_en.pdf.
20. European Council Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Official Journal of the European Union L 2005, 277/1. 40 pp.
21. European Court of Auditors, 2011. Is Agri-environment support well designed and managed? Special Report No 7//2011. Luxembourg. Available from: (accessed 22.11.11). http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/is-agri-environment-support-well-designed-and-managed--pbQJAB11005/downloads/QJ-AB-11-005-EN-C/QJAB11005ENC_002.pdf?FileName=QJAB11005ENC_002.pdf&SKU=QJAB11005ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=QJ-AB-11-005-EN-C.
22. Featherstone M.A., Goodwin B.K. Factors influencing a farmer's decision to invest in long-term conservation improvements. Land Economics 1993, 69:67-81.
23. Garforth, C., Rehman, T., McKemey, K., Yates, C., Bahadur Rana, R., Green, K., Wilkinson, M., Beechener, S., Hollis, K., McIntosh, L., 2006. Research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers in responding to policy changes (England). Final Report November 2006. Defra. Project report no. 9. Research project EPES 0405/17, 69 pp.
24. Gerowitt B., Isselstein J., Marggraf R. Rewards for ecological goods - requirements and perspectives for agricultural land use. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2003, 98:541-547.
25. Glemser H. Erfolgsorientierter Honorierungs-Ansatz bei Agrarumweltmaßnahmen im Baden-Württembergischen MEKA. Presentation at the Workshop 'Erfolgsorientierte Honorierung im Grünland - Erfahrungen aus der Praxis', Slide 40 (data source: 'Großrechnerdaten des Gemeinsamen Antrags (Prüfergebnisse) 2008-2010') 2011.
26. Gould W., Saupe W.E., Klemme R.M. Conservation tillage: the role of farm and operator characteristics and perception of soil erosion. Land Economics 1989, 65:167-181.
27. Groth, M., 2010. Zur Relevanz von Bestandseffekten und der Fundamentalen Transformation in wiederholten Biodiversitätsschutz-Ausschreibungen. University of Lüneburg. Working Paper Series in Economics 159, 21 pp. Available from: (accessed 01.11.11). http://www.leuphana.de/no_cache/institute/ivwl/publikationen/working-papers/2010.html?cid=176912&did=24704&sechash=68dd8eeb.
28. Hasund K.P. Indicator-based agri-environmental payments: a payment-by-result model for public goods with a Swedish application. Land Use Policy 2013, 30:223-233.
29. Hespelt S.-K., Bertke E. Ergebnisorientierte Honorierung ökologischer Leistung der Landwirtschaft. Perspektiven für ein Agrarumweltprogramm der Zukunft. Nova Act. Lc. 2003, 328:343-346.
30. Hofmann H. Umweltleistungen der Landwirtschaft: Konzepte zur Honorierung 1995, Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany, 116 pp.
31. Jacobsen, R.M., Youngs Jr, G.A., Goreham, G.A., Watt, D.L., Dahl, B.L., Sell, R.S., Stearns, L.D., 1991. Selected characteristics of North Dakota farm families engaged in sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural Economics Report No. 271. Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA, 22 pp.
32. Kleijn D., Berendse F., Smit R., Gilissen N. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 2001, 413:723-725.
33. Kleijn D., Sutherland W.J. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?. Journal of Applied Ecology 2003, 40:947-969.
34. Kleijn D., Baquero R.A., Clough Y., Díaz M., Esteban J., Fernández F., Gabriel D., Herzog F., Holzschuh A., Jöhl R., Knop E., Kruess A., Marshall E.J.P., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T., Verhulst J., West T.M., Yela J.L. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters 2006, 9:243-254.
35. Klimek S., Richter gen., Kemmermann A., Steinmann H.-H., Freese J., Isselstein J. Rewarding farmers for delivering vascular plant diversity in managed grasslands: a transdisciplinary case-study approach. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:2888-2897.
36. Kruess A., Tscharntke T. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science 1994, 264:1581-1584.
37. Lamnek S. Qualitative Sozialforschung 2010, Beltz Verlag, Hemsbach, Germany, 748 pp. 5th revised version.
38. Latacz-Lohmann U., Van der Hamsvoort C. Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and an application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1997, 79:407-418.
39. Matzdorf B., Lorenz J. How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-environmental measures? - an empirical analysis in Germany. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:535-544.
40. Marggraf R. Comparative assessment of agri-environment programmes in federal states of Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2003, 98:507-516.
41. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse - Grundlagen und Techniken 2008, Beltz Verlag Weinheim und Basel, Bad Langensalza, 135 pp. 10th ed.
42. ML Niedersachsen, 2010. Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen für das Niedersächsische und Bremer Agrar- Umweltprogramm (NAU/BAU). RdErl. d. ML RdErl. d. ML 107.2-60170/02/10. Nds. Ministerium für den ländlichen Raum, Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, 47 pp.
43. MLR Ministerium für Ernährung und Ländlichen Raum Baden-Württemberg, 2008. Agrarumweltprogramm des Landes Baden-Württemberg MEKA III. Available from: (accessed 06.02.12). https://www.landwirtschaft-bw.info/servlet/PB/show/1218063/mlr_Faltblatt%20MEKA%20III%20-%20Stand%20Januar%202008%20.pdf.
44. Montgomery D. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:13268-13272.
45. Morredu C. Effective Targeting of Agricultural Policies. Best Practise for Policy Design and Implementation 2007, OECD, Paris, 81 pp.
46. Moxey A., White B., Ozanne A. Efficient contract design for agri-environment policy. Journal of Agricultural Economics 1999, 50:187-202.
47. Natural England Entry Level Stewardship: Environmental Stewardship Handbook 2010, Natural England, ISBN 978-1-84754-185-7, NE226, Available from:, (accessed 02.11.11). http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications, 3rd ed.
48. Natural England Higher Level Stewardship: Environmental Stewardship Handbook 2010, Natural England, ISBN 978-1-84754-186-4, NE227, Available from:, (accessed 02.11.11). http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NE227, 3rd ed.
49. Natural England, 2011. Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Available from: (accessed 14.02.11). http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/conservation/designatedareas/sssi/default.aspx.
50. Oppermann R., Briemle G. Blumenwiesen in der landwirtschaftlichen Förderung. Erste Erfahrungen mit der ergebnisorientierten Förderung im baden-württembergischen Agrar-Umweltprogramm MEKA II. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 2002, 37:203-209.
51. Peel S., Chaplin S. Biodiversity of plants and animals in grassland systems: approaches to conservation and restoration in England. Multifunctional Grasslands in a Changing World, Volume II: XXI International Grassland Congress and VIII International Rangeland Congress 2008, 993-998.
52. Raab-Steiner, E., Benesch, M., 2010. Der Fragebogen. Von der Forschungsidee zur SPSS/PASW-Auswertung. 2nd ed. Facultas-Verl., Wien, 190 pp.
53. Sattler C., Nagel U.J. Factors affecting farmers' acceptance of conservation measures - a case study from north-eastern Germany. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:70-77.
54. Schramek, J., Gehrlein, U., Geißendörfer, M., Schaer, B., Wippel, B., Kasperczyk, N., Koch, F., Steinhuber, M., Roedel, T., Vögtlin, J., Braun, S., 2010. Halbzeitbewertung " Maßnahmen- und Entwicklungsplan Ländlicher Raum Baden-Württemberg 2007-2013 (MEPL II)" , Frankfurt, 575 pp.
55. Schwarz G., Moxey A., McCracken D., Huband S., Cummins R. An Analysis of the Potential Effectiveness of a Payment-by-Results Approach to the Delivery of Environmental Public Goods and Services Supplied by Agri-Environment Schemes 2008, Pareto Consulting and Scottish Agricultural College, Macaulay Institute, UK, The land Use Policy Group, 92 pp.
56. Segalen M. Objets domestiques de la vie ouvrière. Transmissions et ruptures dans les familles de Nanterre (1920-1960). Ethnologie Francaise 1987, 17:29-38.
57. Siebert R., Toogood M., Knierim A. Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis 2006, 46:318-340.
58. Siebert R., Berger G., Lorenz J., Pfeffer H. Assessing German farmers' attitudes regarding nature conservation set-aside in regions dominated by arable farming. Journal for Nature Conservation 2010, 18:327-337.
59. Smith P., Martino D., Cai Z., Gwary D., Janzen H., Kumar P., McCarl B., Ogle S., O'Mara F., Rice C., Scholes B., Sirotenko O. Agriculture. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 497-540. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
60. Ulber L., Klimek S., Steinmann H.-H., Isselstein J., Groth M. Implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of a payment scheme for environmental services from agricultural land. Environmental Conservation 2011, 38:464-472. 10.1017/S0376892911000385.
61. Van Rensburg T.M., Murphy E., Rocks P. Commonage land and farmer uptake of the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:345-355.
62. Whitfield J. How green was my subsidy?. Nature 2006, 439:908-909.
63. Whittingham M.J. Will agri-environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not?. Journal of Applied Ecology 2006, 44:1-5.
64. Walford N. Agricultural adjustment: adoption of and adaptation to policy reform measures by large-scale commercial farmers. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:243-257.