Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1642-1646

  Lu, Yue ^a   Wang, Hongning ^b   Zhai, ChengXiang ^b   Roth, Dan ^b  

^a TWITTER INC   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

linear programming; online forums; opinion analysis; optimization; social network analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS; DATA SETS; ONLINE FORUMS; OPINION ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION FORMULATIONS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; TEXT ANALYSIS; TEXTUAL CONTENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84871073314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398489     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In WWW '03, pages 529-535. ACM.
2. M. Bansal, C. Cardie, and L. Lee. The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. COLING'08: Companion volume: Posters, pages 13-16.
3. C. Burfoot, S. Bird, and T. Baldwin. Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In ACL'11: Human Language Technologies, pages 1506-1515.
4. H. Cui, V. Mittal, and M. Datar. Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 1265, 2006.
5. K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. Pennock. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In WWW'03, pages 519-528. ACM.
6. M. Galley, K. McKeown, J. Hirschberg, and E. Shriberg. Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In ACL '04.
7. A. Goldberg and X. Zhu. Seeing stars when there aren't many stars: graph-based semi-supervised learning for sentiment categorization. In TextGraphs-1, pages 45-52. ACL, 2006.
8. T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR'99.
9. S. Kim and E. Hovy. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In COLLING'04, pages 1367-1373. ACL, 2004.
10. B. Liu. Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing Second Edition, pages 1-38, 2010.
11. A. Murakami and R. Raymond. Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In COLING '10: Posters, pages 869-875.
12. B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In ACL'05, pages 115-124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In ACL'02, pages 79-86. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
14. S. Park, K. S. Lee, and J. Song. Contrasting opposing views of news articles on contentious issues. In ACL'11, pages 340-349, 2011.
15. S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. Recognizing stances in online debates. In ACL/AFNLP'09, pages 226-234.
16. S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In CAAGET'10, NAACL-HLT'10, pages 116-124. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
17. M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 327-335, 2006.
18. D. Tversky, Amos; Kahneman. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. pages 453-458, 1981.
19. A. Yessenalina, Y. Yue, and C. Cardie. Multi-level structured models for document-level sentiment classification. In EMNLP'10, pages 1046-1056. Association for Computational Linguistics.