A word-order based graph representation for relevance identification

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2327-2330

  Ramachandran, Lakshmi ^a   Gehringer, Edward F ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

text relevance; text representation; word order graph

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY INFORMATIONS; DEPENDENCY TREES; GRAPH REPRESENTATION; TEXT RELEVANCE; TEXT REPRESENTATION; WORD-ORDER GRAPH;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84871059975     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398632     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. R. Barzilay and M. Elhadad. Using lexical chains for text summarization. In In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pages 10-17, 1997.
2. B. Bohnet. Very high accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING '10, pages 89-97, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010.
3. C. Boonthum. istart: paraphrase recognition. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 workshop on Student research, ACLstudent '04, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2004.
4. E. Charniak. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference, NAACL 2000, pages 132-139, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2000.
5. K. Coursey and R. Mihalcea. Topic identification using wikipedia graph centrality. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers, NAACL-Short '09, pages 117-120, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2009.
6. C. Fellbaum. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, page 423, 1998.
7. E. F. Gehringer. Expertiza: Managing feedback in collaborative learning. In Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support, pages 75-96, 2010.
8. A. D. Haghighi, A. Y. Ng, and C. D. Manning. Robust textual inference via graph matching. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, HLT '05, pages 387-394, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2005.
9. V. Jijkoun and M. de Rijke. Enriching the output of a parser using memory-based learning. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '04, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2004.
10. D. Lin and P. Pantel. Dirt: discovery of inference rules from text. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '01, pages 323-328, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
11. R. Mihalcea and P. Tarau. Textrank: Bringing order into texts. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
12. M. M. Nelson and C. D. Schunn. The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. In Instructional Science, volume 27, pages 375-401, 2009.
13. L. Ramachandran and E. F. Gehringer. Determining degree of relevance of reviews using a graph-based text representation. Tools with Artificial Intelligence, IEEE International Conference on, 0:442-445, 2011.
14. K. Toutanova, D. Klein, C. D. Manning, and Y. Singer. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 252-259, 2003.