Democracy in the contemporary life sciences

BioSocieties

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 459-472

  Rose, Nikolas ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

citizenship; Democracy; Ludwik Fleck; thought styles; truth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871058469     PISSN: 17458552     EISSN: 17458560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.26     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bentall, R.P. (2009) Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail. London: Allen Lane.
2. Bernal, J.D. (2010 [1939]) The Social Function of Science. London: Faber Finds.
3. Borck, C. (2004) Message in a bottle from 'the crisis of reality': On Ludwik Fleck's interventions for an open epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35(3): 447-464. (Pubitemid 40030680)
4. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
5. Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin's Press.
6. Dus, G. (1961) Science for the citizen. Science 133(3461): 1325.
7. Fisher, E. (2005) Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI): Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program. Technology in Society 27(3): 321-328. (Pubitemid 40935974)
8. Fleck, L. (1979 [1935]) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
9. Fleck, L. (1986 [1960]) Crisis in science. In: R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (eds.) Cognition and Fact. Materials on Ludwik Fleck. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, pp. 153-158.
10. Fried, S. (1998) Bitter Pills: Inside the Hazardous World of Legal Drugs. New York: Bantam Books.
11. Gibbon, S. and Novas, C. (2008) Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities. London: Routledge.
12. Gregory, J. and Lock, S.J. (2008) The evolution of 'public understanding of science': Public engagement as a tool of science policy in the UK. Sociology Compass 2(4): 1252-1265.
13. Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York; London: Plenum Trade.
14. Hackett, E.J. (2007) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT.
15. Heath, D., Rapp, R. and Taussig, K.-S. (2004) Genetic citizenship. In: D. Nugent and J. Vincent (eds.) A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Hogben, L. (1938) Science for the Citizen: A Self-educator Based on the Social Background of Scientific Discovery. Woking, UK: Unwin Brothers.
17. Jasanoff, S. (2001) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.
18. Jonas, H. (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility: Foundations of an Ethics for the Technological Age, with an Appendix on the Impotence or Power of Subjectivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Lynch, M. (2012) Science and Technology Studies: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. Oxon, UK; New York: Routledge.
20. Marris, C. and Rose, N. (2010) Open engagement: Exploring public participation in the biosciences. PLoS Biol 8(11): e1000549.
21. Moynihan, R. and Cassels, A. (2005) Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All into Patients. New York: Nation Books.
22. Mundy, A. (2001) Dispensing with the Truth: The Victims, the Drug Companies, and the Dramatic Story behind the Battle over Fen-Phen. New York: St. Martin's Press.
23. Newnes C., Holmes, G. and Dunn C. (1999) This is Madness: A Critical Look at Psychiatry and the Future of Mental Health Services. Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
24. Novas, C. and Rose, N. (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society 29(4): 485-513.
25. Owen, R. and Goldberg, N. (2010) Responsible innovation: A pilot study with the UK engineering and physical sciences research council. Risk Analysis 30(11): 1699-1707.
26. Petryna, A. (2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Rabinow, P. (1996) Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In: Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 91-112.
28. Rabinow, P. (2008) Marking Time: On the Anthropology of the Contemporary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Rose, H. and Rose, S.P.R. (1969) Science and Society. London: Allen Lane.
30. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rose, N. (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18(6): 1-30. (Pubitemid 33402002)
32. Rose, N. (2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Rose, N. and Novas, C. (2004) Biological citizenship. In: A. Ong and S.J. Collier (eds.) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 439-463.
34. Royal Society, C. (1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Society.
35. Shapin, S. (2008) The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Smith, J.S. (1990) Patenting the Sun: Polio and the Salk Vaccine. New York: W. Morrow.
37. Stirling, A. (2008) 'Opening Up' and 'Closing Down'. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262.
38. Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55-74. (Pubitemid 38662277)
39. Tait, J. (2009) Upstream engagement and the governance of science. EMBO Reports 10: S18-S22.
40. Triggle, D.J. (2004) Patenting the sun: Enclosing the scientific commons and transforming the university-Ethical concerns. Drug Development Research 63(3): 139-149. (Pubitemid 40476113)