Ultrasonographic assessment of osteophytes in 127 patients with hand osteoarthritis: Exploring reliability and associations with MRI, radiographs and clinical joint findings

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 51-56

  Mathiessen, Alexander ^a   Haugen, Ida Kristin ^a   Slatkowsky Christensen, Barbara ^a   Bøyesen, Pernille ^a   Kvien, Tore K ^a   Hammer, Hilde Berner ^a  

^a DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CARPOMETACARPAL JOINT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISTAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTER READER RELIABILITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; INTRA READER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OSTEOPHYTE; PERCENTAGE CLOSE AGREEMENT; PERCENTAGE EXACT AGREEMENT; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND ATLAS; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; VALIDITY; WEIGHTED KAPPA;

AGED; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPHYTE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84871038471     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: 14682060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201195     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, et al. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1581-6.
2. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Loge JH, et al. Health-related quality of life in women with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, healthy controls, and normative data. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1404-9. (Pubitemid 350308837)
3. Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of ESCISIT. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:8-17.
4. Maheu E, Altman RD, Bloch DA, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006;14:303-22. (Pubitemid 44268927)
5. Hayashi D, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Osteoarthritis year 2010 in review: imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 2011;19:354-60.
6. Iagnocco A. Imaging the joint in osteoarthritis: a place for ultrasound? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:27-38.
7. Möller I, Bong D, Naredo E, et al. Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2008;16 (Suppl 3):S4-7.
8. Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Iagnocco A, et al. The OMERACT ultrasound task force - status and perspectives. J Rheumatol 2011;38:2063-7.
9. Chao J, Kalunian K. Ultrasonography in osteoarthritis: recent advances and prospects for the future. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2008;20:560-4.
10. Keen HI, Lavie F, Wakefield RJ, et al. The development of a preliminary ultrasonographic scoring system for features of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:651-5. (Pubitemid 351571929)
11. van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007;15:237-44. (Pubitemid 46238253)
12. Kortekaas MC, Kwok WY, Reijnierse M, et al. Osteophytes and joint space narrowing are independently associated with pain in finger joints in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1835-7.
13. Bijsterbosch J, Watt I, Meulenbelt I, et al. Clinical and radiographic disease course of hand osteoarthritis and determinants of outcome after 6 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:68-73.
14. Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Grainger AJ, et al. Can ultrasonography improve on radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis of the hands? A comparison between radiographic and ultrasonographic detected pathology. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1116-20.
15. Vlychou M, Koutroumpas A, Malizos K, et al. Ultrasonographic evidence of inflammation is frequent in hands of patients with erosive osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009;17:1283-7.
16. Wittoek R, Carron P, Verbruggen G. Structural and inflammatory sonographic findings in erosive and non-erosive osteoarthritis of the interphalangeal finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:2173-6.
17. Wittoek R, Jans L, Lambrecht V, et al. Reliability and construct validity of ultrasonography of soft tissue and destructive changes in erosive osteoarthritis of the interphalangeal finger joints: a comparison with MRI. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:278-83.
18. Hammer HB, Bolton-King P, Bakkeheim V, et al. Examination of intra and interrater reliability with a new ultrasonographic reference atlas for scoring of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1995-8.
19. Haugen IK, Lillegraven S, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, et al. Hand osteoarthritis and MRI: development and first validation step of the proposed Oslo Hand Osteoarthritis MRI score. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1033-8.
20. Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1601-10.
21. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2485-7. (Pubitemid 41780675)
22. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, et al. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:641-9. (Pubitemid 32588366)
23. Haugen IK, Bøyesen P, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, et al. Associations between MRI-defined synovitis, bone marrow lesions and structural features and measures of pain and physical function in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 29 November 201. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis- 2011-200341.
24. Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007;15 (Suppl A):A1-56.
25. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: Development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10:855-62. (Pubitemid 35378771)
26. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Bellamy N. Performance of the Norwegian version of AUSCAN - a disease-specific measure of hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2005;13:561-7. (Pubitemid 40867854)
27. Haugen IK, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Lessem J, et al. The responsiveness of joint counts, patient-reported measures and proposed composite scores in hand osteoarthritis: analyses from a placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1436-40.
28. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB. Sensitivity to change of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2000;8 (Suppl A):S25-8.
29. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB, et al. Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1995;62:43S-53S.
30. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, et al. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1-10.
31. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-20.
32. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. (Pubitemid 8054849)
33. Cicuttini FM, Baker J, Hart DJ, et al. Relation between Heberden's nodes and distal interphalangeal joint osteophytes and their role as markers of generalised disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:246-8. (Pubitemid 28323267)
34. Lane NE, Bloch DA, Jones HH, et al. Osteoarthritis in the hand: a comparison of handedness and hand use. J Rheumatol 1989;16:637-42. (Pubitemid 19154407)
35. Katz JD, Agrawal S, Velasquez M. Getting to the heart of the matter: osteoarthritis takes its place as part of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2010;22:512-19.
36. Kidd BL, Mapp PI, Gibson SJ, et al. A neurogenic mechanism for symmetrical arthritis. Lancet 1989;2:1128-30. (Pubitemid 19267109)
37. Spector TD, Campion GD. Generalised osteoarthritis: a hormonally mediated disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1989;48:523-7. (Pubitemid 19158946)
38. Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, et al. Do metabolic factors add to the effect of overweight on hand osteoarthritis? The Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:916-20. (Pubitemid 46999793)
39. Spector TD, Cicuttini F, Baker J, et al. Genetic influences on osteoarthritis in women: a twin study. BMJ 1996;312:940-3. (Pubitemid 26111783)
40. Kellgren J. The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Atlas of Standard Radiographs of arthritis. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1963:1-13.
41. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502.
42. Bijsterbosch J, Haugen IK, Malines C, et al. Reliability, sensitivity to change and feasibility of three radiographic scoring methods for hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1465-7.
43. Maheu E, Cadet C, Gueneugues S, et al. Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of four scoring methods for the radiological assessment of osteoarthritis of the hand. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:464-9. (Pubitemid 46580465)
44. Tan AL, Grainger AJ, Tanner SF, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2355-65. (Pubitemid 41117420)