Evaluating the performance of individual-based animal movement models in novel environments

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 250, Issue , 2013, Pages 214-234

  Watkins, Katherine Shepard ^a   Rose, Kenneth A ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal; Behavioral movement; Fish; Genetic algorithm; Individual based model

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MOVEMENT; BEHAVIORAL MOVEMENT; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EVENT-BASED; HABITAT QUALITY; INDIVIDUAL-BASED; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS; MOVEMENT MODEL; MOVEMENT PATTERN; RANDOM DISTRIBUTION; SMALL PELAGIC FISH; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS; SUBMODELS; TEST ENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEMS; FISH; GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ANIMAL COMMUNITY; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GROWTH; HABITAT QUALITY; MOVEMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMALIA; ENGRAULIDAE;

EID: 84871010572     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson J.J. An agent-based event driven foraging model. Natural Resource Modeling 2002, 15:55-82.
2. Bassista T.P., Hartman K.J. Reproductive biology and egg mortality of bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli, in the Hudson River estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2005, 73:49-59.
3. Campbell M.D., Rose K., Boswell K., Cowan J. Individual-based modeling of an artificial reef fish community: effects of habitat quantity and degree of refuge. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222:3895-3909.
4. Codling E.A., Plank M., Benhamou J.S. Random walk models in biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2008, 5:813-834.
5. Conner M.M., Ebinger M.R., Knowlton F.F. Evaluating coyote management strategies using a spatially explicit, individual-based, socially structured population model. Ecological Modelling 2008, 219:234-247.
6. Duboz R., Versmisse D., Travers M., Ramat E., Shin Y.-J. An application of an evolutionary algorithm to the inverse parameter estimation of an individual-based model. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:840-849.
7. Giske J., Huse G., Fiksen O. Modelling spatial dynamics of fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1998, 8:57-91.
8. Giske J., Mangle M., Jakobse P., Huse G., Wilcox C., Strand E. Explicit trade-off rules in proximate adaptive agents. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2003, 5:835-865.
9. Goodwin R.A., Nestler J.M., Anderson J.J., Webber L.J., Loucks D.P. Forcasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM). Ecological Modelling 2006, 192:97-223.
10. Gomez F., Miikkulainen R. Incremental evolution of complex general behavior. Adaptive Behavior 1997, 5:317-342.
11. Haas H.L., Rose K.A., Fry B., Minello T.J., Rozas L.P. Brown shrimp on the edge: linking habitat to survival using an individual-based simulation model. Ecological Modelling 2004, 310:987-991.
12. Holland J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 211 pp.
13. Humphries N.E., Queiroz N., Dyer J.R.M., Pade N.G., Musyl M.K., Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., Brunnschweiler J.M., Doyle T.K., Houghton J.D.R., Hays G.C., Jones C.S., Nobel L.R., Wearmouth V.J., Southall E.J., Sims D.W. Environmental context explains Levy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nature 2010, 465:1066-1069.
14. Humston R., Ault J.S., Lutcavage M., Olson D.B. Schooling and migration of large pelagic fishes relative to environmental cues. Fisheries Oceanography 2000, 9:136-146.
15. Humston R., Olson D.B., Ault J.S. Behavioral assumptions in models of fish movement and their influence on population dynamics. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2004, 133:1304-1328.
16. Huse G., Giske J. Ecology in Mare Pentium: an individual-based spatio-temporal model for fish with adapted behavior. Fisheries Research 1998, 37:163-178.
17. Huse G. Modelling habitat choice in fish using adapted random walk. Sarsia 2001, 86:477-483.
18. Huse G., Ellingsen I. Capelin migrations and climate change-a modelling analysis. Climatic Change 2008, 87:177-197.
19. Jung S., Houde E.D. Production of bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli in Chesapeake Bay: application of size-based theory. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2004, 281:217-232.
20. Lapolla A.E. Bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli in Narrangansett Bay, Rhode Island. I. Populations structure, growth, and mortality. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2001, 217:93-102.
21. Letcher B.H., Priddy J.A., Walters J.R., Crowder L.B. An individual-based, spatially-explicit simulation model of the population dynamics of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker, Picoides borealis. Biological Conservation 1998, 86:1-14.
22. Loboschefsky, E., Massoudieh, A., Sommer, T., Rose, K., Ginn, Loge, F. Individual-based modeling of the striped bass (Morone saxatilis) population in the San Francisco Bay estuary and delta. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, in review.
23. MacCall A.D. Dynamic Geography of marine Fish Populations 1990, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 200 pp.
24. Mills C.M., Townsend S.E., Jennings S., Eastwood P.D., Houghton C.A. Estimating high resolution trawl fishing effort from satellite-based vessel monitoring system data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2007, 64:248-255.
25. Mueller T., Fagan W.F., Grimm V. Integrating individual search and navigation behaviors in mechanistic movement models. Theoretical Ecology 2011, 4:341-355.
26. Myers A.E., Lovell P., Hays G.C. Tools for studying animal behavior: validating dive profiles relayed via the Argos satellite system. Animal Behaviour 2006, 71:989-993.
27. Okunishi T., Yamanaka Y., Ito S. A simulation model for Japanese sardine (Sardinops melanostictus) migrations in the western North Pacific. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:462-479.
28. Railsback S.F., Lamberson R.H., Harvey B.C., Duffy W.E. Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecological Modelling 1999, 123:73-89.
29. Ramsey D.S.L., Efford M.G. Management of bovine tuberculosis in brushtail possums in New Zealand: predictions from a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Journal of Applied Ecology 2010, 47:911-919.
30. Roth B.M., Rose K.A., Rozas L.P., Minello T.J. Relative influence of habitat fragmentation and inundation on brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus production in northern Gulf of Mexico salt marshes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2008, 359:185-202.
31. Scheffer M., Baveco J.M., DeAngelis D.L., Rose K.A., van Nes E.H. Super-individuals a simple solution for modeling large populations on an individual basis. Ecological Modelling 1995, 80:161-170.
32. Shepherd T.D., Litvak M.K. Density-dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution in marine fish spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions. Fish and Fisheries 2004, 5:141-152.
33. Strand E., Huse G., Giske J. Artificial evolution of life history and behavior. The American Naturalist 2002, 159:624-644.
34. Strand E., Huse G. Vertical migration in adult Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2007, 64:1747-1760.
35. Tyler J.A., Rose K.A. Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1994, 4:91-123.
36. Van Rooji A.J.F., Jain L.C., Johnson R.P. Neural Network Training Using Genetic Algorithms 1996, World Scientific, Singapore, 130 pp.
37. Wang D., Berry M.W., Gross L.J. A parallel structured ecological model for high end shared memory computers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2008, 4315:107-118.
38. Yemane D., Shin Y., Field J.G. Exploring the effects of marine protected areas on the dynamics of fish communities in the southern Benguela: an individual-based modeling approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2008, 66:378-387.