An agent-based event driven foraging model

Natural Resource Modeling

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 55-82

  Anderson, James J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844552502     PISSN: 08908575     EISSN: 19397445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2002.tb00080.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J.J. Anderson [1988] A Neural Model for Visual Activation of Startle Behavior in Fish, J. Theoret. Biol. 131, 289–305.
2. W.N. Beer and J.J. Anderson [2000], Application of the Out-Migrant Survival Simulator (OMSS) Using the SWARM Modeling Environment to Study Smolt-Predator Interactions, Columbia Basin Research, School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, Univer. of Washington, http:www.cbr.washington.edupapersswarmfest.html.
3. G.P. Baerends and J.P. Kruijt [1973], Stimulus Selection, in Constraints on Learning, (R.A. Hinde and J. Stevenson-Hinde, eds.), Academic Press, London.
4. R.R. Bush and R. Mosteller [1955], Stochastic Models for Learning, Wiley, New York.
5. E.L. Charnov [1976], Optimal Foraging, the Marginal Value Theorem, Theoret Pop. Biol. 9, 129–136.
6. J. Changeux [1985], Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind, (Pantheon Books, New York.
7. P. S. Churchland [1986], Neurophilosophy: Toward a U nified Science of the Mind-Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. M.E. Clark and K.A. Rose [1997], Individual-Based Model of Sympatric Populations of Stream Resident Rainbow Trout and Brook Char: Model Description, Cor-roboration, and Effects of Sympatry and Spawning Seasons Duration, Ecol. Model. 94, 157–175.
9. L.M. Dill [1974a], The Escape Response of Zebra Danio (Brachydanio Rerio I. The Stimulus for Escape Anim. Behav. 22, 711–722.
10. L.M. Dill [1974b], The Escape Response of Zebra Danio (Brachydanio Rerio). The Effect of Experience Anim. Behav. 22, 722–729.
11. L.M. Dill and A.H.G. Fraser [1984], Risk of Predation and the Feeding Behavior of Juvenile Coho Salmon, (Oncorhynchus kisutch Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 65–71.
12. R.L. Dunbrack and L.M Dill [1983], A Model of Size Dependent Surface Feeding in a Stream Dwelling Salmonid, in Predators and Prey in Fishes, (D.L. Noakes, D.G. Linquist, G.S. Helfman and J.A. Ward, eds.), Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague.
13. R.A. Goodwin, J.M. Nestler, D.P. Loucks and R.S Chapman [2001], Simulating Mobile Populations in Aquatic Ecosystems, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127, 386–393.
14. V. Grimm, T. Wyszomirski, D. Aikman and J. Uchmanski [1999], Individual-Based Modeling and Ecological Theory: Synthesis of a Workshop, Ecol. Model. 115, 275–282.
15. P.C. Hanson, T.B. Johnson, D.E. Schindler and J.E. Kitchell [1997], Fish Bioener-getics, 3.0, Board of Regents University of Wisconsin System Sea Grant Institute Center for Limnology.
16. H. Hirvonen, E. Ranta, H. Rita and N. Peuhkuri [1999], Significance of Memory Properties in Prey Choice Decisions, Ecol. Model. 115, 177–189.
17. A.I. Houston and J.M. McNamara [1999], Models of Adaptive Behavior: An Approach Based on State, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
18. M. Jobling [1995], Environmental Biology of Fishes, Fish and Fisheries Series 16, Chapman & Hall, London.
19. A. Kacelnik and M. Bateson [1996], Risky Theories the Effects of Variance on Foraging Decisions, Amer. Zool. 36, 402–434.
20. A. Kacelnik and F.B.E. Abreu [1998], Risky Choice and Webers Law, J. Theoret. Biol. 194, 289–298.
21. A. Kacelnik and J.R. Krebs [1985], Learning to Exploit Patchily Distributed Food, in Behavioral Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behavior (R.N. Sibyl and R.H. Smith, eds.), Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.
22. E.R. Kandel [1979], Behavioral Biology of Aplysia, Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.
23. J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies [1984], Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.
24. C.G. Langton [1995], Artificial Life: An Overview, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. M. Mangel and C.W. Clark [1998], Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. J.Maynard Smith [1982], Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
27. D. McFarland and A. Houston [1981], Quantitative Ethology: The State Space Approach, Pitman Advanced Publ. Boston, MA.
28. N. Minar, R. Burkhart, Chris Langton and Manor Askenazi [1996], The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 9606–042.
29. K. Nishimura [1999], Exploration of Optimal Giving-Up Time in Uncertain Environment: A Sit-and-Wait Forager, J. Theoret. Biol. 199, 321–327.
30. S.F. Railsback, R.H. Lamberson, B.C. Harvey and W.E. Duffy [1999], Movement Rules for Individual-Based Models of Stream Fish, Ecol. Model. 123, 73–89.
31. A. Rapoport [1983], Mathematical Models in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Wiley-Interscience Publ., New York.
32. D.A. Roff [1992], The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis, Chapman & Hall, Routledge.
33. Sara J. Shettleworth [2001], Animal Cognition and Animal Behavior, Anim. Behav. 61, 277–286.
34. D.W. Stephens and J.R. Krebs [1986], Foraging Theory, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
35. M.L. Wildhaber, R.F. Green and H.B. Crowder [1994], Bluegills Continuously Update Patch Giving-Up Times Based on Foraging Experience, Anim. Behav. 47, 501–513.
36. W. Van Winkler, K.A. Rose and R.C. Chamberes [1993], Individual-Based Approaches to Fish Population Dynamics: An Overview, Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122, 397–403.
37. J.L. Vogel and D. A. Beauchamp [1999], Effects of Light, Prey Size, and Turbidity on Reaction Distances of Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to Salmonid Prey, Canad. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1293–1297.
38. J. Von Neumann, and O. Morgenstern [1944], Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.