Connected-network paradigm for the alluvial aquifer system

Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

Volumn 348, Issue , 2000, Pages 25-42

  Fogg, Graham E ^a   Carle, Steven F ^b   Green, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DEPOSITS; FLOODS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MINING LAWS AND REGULATIONS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

ALLUVIAL AQUIFER SYSTEMS; CHANNEL ORIENTATIONS; EFFECTIVE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES; FINE-GRAINED MATERIAL; GEOSTATISTICAL SIMULATION; HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORIES; SUBSURFACE HETEROGENEITY;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

ALLUVIAL FAN; ALLUVIAL PLAIN; AQUITARD; CONNECTIVITY; DRAWDOWN; FINE GRAINED SEDIMENT; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROSTATICS; KNOWLEDGE; LABORATORY METHOD; LEVEE; SAND AND GRAVEL;

EID: 84870995103     PISSN: 00721077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2348-5.25     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, J.R.L., 1970, Physical processes of sedimentation: New York, American Elsevier Publishing Company, 248 p.
2. Anderson, M.P., and Woessner, W.W., 1992, Applied groundwater modeling: San Diego, California, Academic Press, Inc., 391 p.
3. Benjamin, A., 1994, Impact of deep aquifer pumping on the stream and multiaquifer systems along Putah Creek near Davis, California [M.S. thesis]: Davis, University of California, 150 p.
4. Carle, S.F., 1996, Atransition probability-based approach to geostatistical characterization of hydrostratigraphic architecture [Ph.D. thesis]: Davis, University of California, 248 p.
5. Carle, S.F., 1997a, Implementation schemes for avoiding artifact discontinuities in simulated annealing: Mathematical Geology, v. 29, p. 231-244.
6. Carle, S.F., 1997b, Integration of geologic interpretation into geostatistical simulation, in Pawlowsky Glahn,V., ed., IAMG'97 Proceedings of The Third Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology: Barcelona, Spain, International Center for Numerical Methods.
7. Carle, S.F., and Fogg, G.E., 1996, Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics: Mathematical Geology, v. 28, p. 453-477.
8. Carle, S.F., and Fogg, G.E., 1997, Modeling spatial variability with one-and multi-dimensional Markov chains: Mathematical Geology, v. 29, p. 891-918.
9. Carle, S.F., Labolle, E.M., Weissmann, G.S., Van Brocklin, D., and Fogg, G.E., 1998, Conditional simulation of hydrofacies architecture: A transition probability/Markov approach, in Fraser, G.S., and Davis, J.M., eds., Concepts in hydrogeology and environmental geology, Number 1: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Special Publication, p. 147-170.
10. Collinson, J.D., 1986, Alluvial sediments, in Reading, H.G., ed., Sedimentary environments and facies: Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, p. 20-62.
11. Dagan, G., 1990, Transport in heterogeneous porous formations-Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion: Water Resources Research, v. 26, p. 1281-1290.
12. Deutsch, C.V., and Journel, A.G., 1998, GSLIB, Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide (second edition): New York, Oxford University Press, 369 p.
13. Dibblee, T.W., 1980, Apreliminary map of the Livermore Quadrangle, Alameda County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-533b.
14. Fogg, G.E., Noyes, C.D., and Carle, S.F., 1998, Geologically-based model of heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity in an alluvial setting: Hydrologeology Journal, v. 6, p. 131-143.
15. Freeze, R. A., 1975, A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media: Water Resources Research, v. 11, p. 725-741.
16. Gelhar, L.W., and Axness, C.L., 1983, Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers: Water Resources Research, v. 19, p. 161-180.
17. Goovaerts, P., 1996, Stochastic simulation of categorical variables using a classification algorithm and simulated annealing: Mathematical Geology, v. 28, p. 909-921.
18. Hantush, M.S., and Jacob, C.E., 1955, Nonsteady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 36, p. 95-100.
19. Leeder, M.R., 1982, Sedimentology: London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 344 p.
20. LaBolle, E.M., 1999, Theory and simulation of diffusion processes in porous media [Ph.D. thesis]: Davis, University of California, 202 p.
21. McDonald, M.G., and Harbaugh, A.W., 1988, A modular finite-difference ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 06-A1, 576 p.
22. Neuman, S.P., and Witherspoon, P. A., 1972, Field determination of hydraulic properties of leaky multiple aquifer systems: Water Resources Research, v. 8, p. 1284-1298.
23. Noyes, C.D., 1990, Hydrostratigraphic analysis of the Pilot Remediation Test Area, LLNL, Livermore, California [M.S. thesis]: Davis, University of California, 165 p.
24. Qualheim, B.J., 1988, Well log report for the LLNL ground water project 1984-1987: Livermore, California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCID-21342, 12 p.
25. Rubin, Y., 1990, Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media: Water Resources Research, v. 26, p. 133-141.
26. Rust, B.R., 1983, Coarse alluvial deposits, in Walker, R. G., ed., Facies models: Geological Association of Canada, p. 9-22.
27. Scheibe, T.D., 1993, Characterization of the spatial structuring of natural porous media and its impacts on subsurface flow and transport [Ph.D. thesis]: Stanford, California, Stanford University, 316 p.
28. Schroth, B., and Narasimhan, T.N., 1997, Application of a numerical model in the interpretation of a leaky aquifer test: Ground Water, v. 35, p. 371-375.
29. Theis, C.V., 1935, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 2, p. 519-524.
30. Thorpe, R.K., Isherwood, W.F., Dresen, M.D., and Webster-Scholten, C., 1990, CERCLA remedial investigations report for the LLNL Livermore site: Livermore, California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCAR-10299.
31. Walker, R.G., and Cant, C.J., 1983, Sandy fluvial deposits, in Walker, R.G., ed., Facies models: Geological Association of Canada, p. 23-32.
32. Webb, E.K., and Anderson, M.P., 1996, Simulation of preferential flow in three-dimensional heterogeneous conductivity fields with realistic internal architecture: Water Resources Research, v. 32, p. 533-545.
33. Weissmann, G.S., and Fogg, G.E., 1999, Alluvial fan hydrostratigraphy modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework: Journal of Hydrology, v. 226, p. 48-65.
34. Weissmann, G.S., Carle, S.F., and Fogg, G.E., 1999, Three-dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics: Water Resources Research, v. 35, p. 1761-1770