Geologically based model of heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity in an alluvial setting

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 131-143

  Fogg, Graham E ^a   Noyes, Charles D ^b   Carle, Steven F ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Weiss Associates   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001571047     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100400050139     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson MP (1987) Field studies in groundwater hydrology: a new era. Rev Geophys 25 (2) : 141-147
2. American Society of Testing Methods Annual Book of Standards (ASTM) (1986) Standard recommended practice for particle size analysis for soils. ASTMD, pp 422-463
3. Blume and Associates, Inc. (1972) Investigation of faulting at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, UCRL-13568
4. Boulton NS (1963) Analysis of data from non-equilibrium pumpins tests allowing for delayed yield from storage. Proc Inst Civ Eng 26:469-482
5. California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) (1966) Livermore and Sunol valleys, evaluation of ground water resources, Appendix A: Geology. State of California Department of Water Resources Bulletin, Sacramento, California 118-2
6. California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) (1974) Evaluation of ground water resources. Livermore and Sunol valleys. State of California Department of Water Resources Bulletin, Sacramento, California, 118-2, 152 pp
7. Carerra J, Neuman SP (1986) Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions, 1, Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information. Water Resourc Res 22 (2): 199-210
8. Carle SF (1996) A transition probability-based approach to geostatistical characterization of hydrostratigraphic architecture. PhD dissertation, University of California, at Davis
9. Carle SF (1997) Implementation schemes for avoiding artifact discontinuities in simulated annealing. Math Geol 29 (2)
10. Carle SF, Fogg GE (1996) Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics. Math Geol 28 (4): 453-476
11. Carle SF, Fogg GE (1997) Modeling spatial variability with one-and multi-dimensional continuous Markov chains. Math Geol 29 (7):891-917
12. Carle SF, LaBolle EM, Weissmann GS, VanBrocklin D, Fogg GE (1998) Geostatistical simulation of hydrostratigraphic architecture: a transition probability / Markov approach; in Concepts in Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology No. 2, SEPM Special Publication p. 147-170
13. Carpenter, D.W., J.J. Sweeney, P.W. Kasameyer, N.R. Burkhard, K.G. Knauss, and R.J. Shlemon, 1984, Geology of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site and Adjacent Areas, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California (UCRL-53316)
14. Cooper HH, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 24:526-534
15. Cooper HH, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos SS (1967) Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resourc Res 3:263-269
16. Copty N, Rubin Y (1995) A stochastic approach to the characterization of lithofacies from surface seismic and well data. Water Resourc Res 31 (7): 1673-1686
17. Dagan G (1990) Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion. Water Resourc Res 26 (6): 1281-1290
18. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford
19. Dibblee TW (1980) A preliminary map of the Livermore Quadrancle, Alameda County, California. USGS Open-File Rep 80-533b
20. Etheridge FG, Schumm SA (1978) Reconstructing paleochannel morphologic and flow characteristics: methodology, limitations, and assessment. In: Miall AD (ed) Fluvial sedimentology. Can Soc Pet Geol Mem 5:703-721
21. Fogg GE (1986) Groundwater flow and sand body interconnectedness in a thick multiple aquifer system. Water Resourc Res 22 (5): 679-694
22. Fogg GE (1990) Architecture and interconnectedness of geologic media: role of the low-permeability facies in flow and transport. In: Neuman SP, Neretnieks I (eds) Hydrogeology of low permeability environments. Special Symposium at the 28th International Geological Congress, Washington DC, 9-19 July 1989. Verlag Heinz Heise, pp 19-40
23. Fogg GE, Lucia FJ, Senger RK (1991) Stochastic simulation of interwell-scale heterogeneity for improved prediction of sweep efficiency in a carbonate reservoir. In: Lake LW, Carroll HB Jr, Wesson TC (eds) Reservoir characterization, vol II. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 355-381
24. Freeze RA (1975) A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media. Water Resourc Res 11 (5): 725-741
25. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
26. Galloway WE, Hobday DK (1983) Terrigenous clastic depositional systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
27. Gelhar LW, Axness CL (1983) Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resourc Res 19 (1):161-180
28. Hantush MS, Jacob CE (1955) Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Trans Am Geophys Union 36 (1):95-100
29. Hantush MS (1960) Modifications of the Theory of Leaky Aquifers. Trans Am Geophys Union 65:3173-3175
30. Hill MC (1992) A computer program (modflowp) for estimating parameters of a transient, three-dimensional, ground-water flow model using nonlinear regression. USGS Open-File Rep 91-0484
31. Jensen JL, Hinkley DV, Lake LW (1987) A statistical study of reservoir permeability: distributions, correlations, and averages. SPE Formation Evaluation: 461-468
32. Johnson NM, Dreiss SJ (1989) Hydrostratigraphic interpretation using indicator geostatistics. Water Resourc Res 25 (12):72501-2510
33. Koltermann CE, Gorelick SM (1996) Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: a review of structure-imitating, process-imitatina, and descriptive approaches. Water Resourc Res 32:2617-2658
34. McKenna SA, Poeter EP (1995) Field example of data fusion in site characterization. Water Resourc Res 31 (12): 3229-3240
35. Miall AD (1984) Principles of sedimentary basin analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
36. Neuman SP (1995) On advective transport in fractal permeability and velocity fields. Water Resourc Res 31 (6): 1455-1460
37. Noyes CD (1991) Hydrostratigraphic analysis of the Pilot Remediation Test Area, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California. University of California, Davis, M.S. thesis, 165 pp
38. Papadopulous SS, Cooper HH Jr (1967) Drawdown in a well of large diameter. Water Resourc Res (3): 241-244
39. Qualheim BJ (1988) Well Log Report for the LLNL Ground Water Project 1984-1987. Environmental Restoration Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, UCID-21342
40. Ritzi RW Jr, Dominic DF, Brown NR, Kausch KW, McAlenney PJ, Basial MJ (1995) Hydrofacies distribution and correlation in the Miami Valley aquifer system. Water Resourc Res 31 (12):3271-3281
41. Ross S (1993) Introduction to probability models, 5th edn. Academic Press, San Diego
42. Reading HG (ed) (1978) Sedimentary environments and facies. Elsevier, New York
43. Scheibe RD, Murray CJ (1994) A comparison of stochastic simulation techniques for groundwater transport modeling (abstract). Eos Trans AGU Suppl 75 (44): 256
44. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using around-water storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16:519-524
45. Thorpe RK, Isherwood WF, Dresen MD, Webster-Scholten CP (eds) (1990) CERCLA Remedial Investigation Report for the LLNL Livermore Site. Environmental Restoration Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
46. Walker RG (ed) (1981) Facies models. Geoscience Canada Reprint Series 1, Geoscience Canada, Toronto, 211 pp
47. Webb EK, Anderson MP (1996) Simulation of preferential How in three-dimensional, heterogeneous conductivity fields with realistic internal architecture. Water Resourc Res 32 (3):533-545
48. Webster-Scholten CP, Hall CH (1989) Work plan. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore Site: CERCLA Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California (UCAR-10225)
49. Yeh WWG (1986) Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: the inverse problem. Water Resourc Res 22 (2): 95-108