Managing platform ecosystems;Gérer l'écosystème d'une plate-forme

ICIS 2008 Proceedings - Twenty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Parker, Geoffrey ^a   Van Alstyne, Marshall ^b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright and patent length; IT systems design; Network effects; Network externalities; Platforms; Sequential innovation

Indexed keywords

IT SYSTEMS DESIGNS; NETWORK EFFECTS; NETWORK EXTERNALITY; PLATFORMS; SEQUENTIAL INNOVATIONS;

GERMANIUM; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PROFITABILITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 84870973654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Adams, W. J. and J. L. Yellen (1976). "Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly, " Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, pp 475-98.
2. Baldwin, Carliss and Kim Clark (2000), Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bessen, J., and E. Maskin. (forthcoming) "Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. " Rand Journal of Economics.
4. Boudreau, K. (2007) "Does Opening a Platform Stimulate Innovation? The Effect on Systemic and Modular Innovations. " Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=913402.
5. Bresnehan, T. and S. Greenstein (1999). "Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry, " Journal of Industrial Economics 47 pp 1-40.
6. Caillaud, B. and B. Jullien. (2003) "Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers. " Rand Journal of Economics 34(2).
7. Chang, H.F. (1995). "Patent Scope, Antitrust Policy, and Cumulative Innovation, " Rand Journal of Economics 26(1), 34-57.
8. Chesbrough, Henry (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Cusumano, M. and A. Gawer. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA.
10. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G. and M. Van Alstyne (2006), 'Strategies for two-sided markets,' Harvard Business Review, Oct. p 92-101.
11. Eisenmann, T, G. Parker & M. Van Alstyne (2009) "Opening Platforms: How, When & Why" in Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Ed. A. Gawer, Edward Elgar Publishing (forthcoming).
12. Eisenmann, T, Parker, G. and M. Van Alstyne. (2007) "Platform Envelopment. " Harvard Business School working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=996852.
13. Evans, David, Andrei Hagiu and Richard Schmalensee (2006), Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries, Boston: MIT Press.
14. Farrell, J., Monroe, H. & Saloner, G. (1998) "The Vertical Organization of Industry: Systems Competition vs Component Competition" Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7(2) pp 143-82.
15. Gawer, Annabelle and Michael Cusumano (2002), Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Gawer, A. and R. Henderson (2007), 'Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel,' Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 1-34.
17. Gallini, Winter (1985). "Licensing in the Theory of Innovation, " Rand Journal of Economics 16(2), 237-252.
18. Geng, X., Stinchcombe, M., Whinston, A. (2005). "Bundling Information Goods of Decreasing Value. " Management Science Vol. 51, No. 4, 662-667.
19. Gilbert & Shapiro (1990). "Optimal patent length and breadth" Rand Journal of Economics 21(1), 106-112.
20. Green, J.R. & S. Scotchmer (1995). "On the division of profit in sequential innovation, " Rand Journal of Economics 26(1), 20-33.
21. Grove, A. (1996), Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career, New York: Doubleday.
22. Heller, M. & R. Eisenberg (1998) "Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research, " Science 280(5364) pp. 698-701.
23. Klemperer, P (1990) "How broad should the scope of patent protection be?" Rand Journal of Economics 21(1), 113-130.
24. Landes, W. M., R. A. Posner (2003) "Indefinitely Renewable Copyright" University of Chicago Law Review 70(2), 471-518.
25. McAfee, P., McMillan, J., Whinston, M. (1989). "Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of Values. "
26. Parker, G. and M. Van Alstyne, (2000), "Information Complements Substitutes and Strategic Product Design, working paper available at SSRN, abstract = 249585.
27. Parker, G. and M. Van Alstyne (2005). "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. " Management Science Vol. 51, No. 10.
28. Rey, P. and D. Salant (2007). "Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property. " IDEI Working Paper.
29. Rochet, J.C. and J. Tirole (2003). "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. " Journal of the European Economic Association.
30. Scotchmer, S. (1996). "Protecting early innovators: should second generation products be patentable?, " Rand Journal of Economics 27(2), 322-331.
31. Shapiro, C. (2001) "Navigating the patent thicket: cross-licenses, patent-pools, and standard-setting" in Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol 1. (eds.) A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern; MIT Press.
32. West, J. (2003), 'How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies,' Research Policy, 32, 1259-1285.