Designing mixed-method research inspired by a critical realism philosophy: A tale from the field of IS innovation

ICIS 2010 Proceedings - Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Zachariadis, Markos ^a   Scott, Susan ^a   Barrett, Michael ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical realism; IS research methods; Methodology; Mixed methods; Qualitative and quantitative research

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL REALISM; IS RESEARCH METHODS; METHODOLOGY; MIXED METHOD; QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84870973553     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (90)

1. Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, D. J. (2006). Which came first, IT of Productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-22). Milwaukee.
2. Arrow, K. J., & Hahn, F. H. (1971). General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
3. Bache, I. W. (2003). Critical Realism and Econometrics. Working Paper: Central Bank of Norway, Research Department, Norges Bank (pp. 1-22).
4. Baert, P. (1996). Realist philosophy of the social sciences and economics: a critique. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 513-522.
5. Benbasat, I., & Weber, R. (1996). Research Commentary: Rethinking Diversity in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-400.
6. Bhaskar, R. (1975). A Realist Theory of Science [RTS]. Leeds: Leeds Books (first.).
7. Bhaskar, R. (1978). The possibility of naturalism. Sussex: Harvester Press.
8. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.
9. Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie, Critical realism: essential readings (first.). London: Routledge.
10. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66-77.
11. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49-55.
12. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1995). Computers as a Factor of Production: The Role of Differences Among Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3), 183-199.
13. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1997). Computing productivity: Are computers pulling their weight?, MIT and Wharton working paper.
14. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541-558.
15. Carlsson, S. A. (n.d.). Critical Realism: A Way Forward in IS Research. Unpublished Draft (pp. 1-12).
16. Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature's Capacities And Their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Cherryholmes, C. H. (1992). Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 13-17.
18. Collier, A. (1994). Critical Realism. London: Verso.
19. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage (Second., pp. 1-246).
20. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology. Chicago, IL.: Aldine.
21. Dewan, S., & Min, C. (1997). The Substitution of Information Technology for Other Factors of Production: A Firm Level Analysis. Management Science, 43(12), 1660-1675.
22. Downward, P., Finch, J. H., & Ramsay, J. (2002). Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 481-500.
23. Downward, P., & Mearman, A. (2002). Critical Realism and Econometrics: Constructive Dialogue with Post-Keynesian Economics. Metroeconomica, 53(4), 391-415.
24. Downward, P., & Mearman, A. (2006). Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social science. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(1), 77-99.
25. Draca, M., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Productivity and ICT: A Review of the Evidence. In R. Mansell, C. Avgerou, D. Quah, & R. Silverstone, The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies (pp. 100-147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Fitzgerald, B., & Hayes, J. (2008). From Peer Production to Productization: A Study of Socially Enabled Business Exchanges in Open Source Service Networks. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 475-493.
27. Fleetwood, S. (1999). Situating Critical Realism in Economics. In S. Fleetwood, Critical Realism in Economics (first., pp. 127-135). London: Routledge.
28. Fleetwood, S. (2001). Causal Laws, Functional Relations and Tendencies. Review of Political Economy, 13(2), 201-220.
29. Fleetwood, S. (2005). Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective. Organization, 12(2), 197-222.
30. Fox, S. (1992). What are we? The constitution of management in higher education. International Studies of Management & Organization, 22(3), 71-93.
31. Gable, G. (1994). Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems. European journal of information systems, 3(2), 112-126.
32. Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987). Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 900-902.
33. Groff, R. (2000). The Truth of the Matter: Roy Bhaskar's Critical Realism and the Concept of Alethic Truth. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 30(3), 407-435.
34. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research (1st Ed., pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Hands, W. D. (1999). Empirical realism as meta-method: Tony Lawson on neoclassical economics. In S. Fleetwood, Critical Realism in Economics (first., pp. 169-186). London: Routledge.
36. Hoover, K. D. (1997). Econometrics and Reality. Working Paper: UC Davis - Dept. of Economics, The Working Papers of the Department of Economics, University of California, Davis. (pp. 1-38).
37. Howe, R. K. (1988). Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16.
38. Hume, D. (1967). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Jones, M. (2000). Mission impossible? Pluralism and 'multi-paradigm' IS research. Information Systems Review, 1(1), 217-232.
40. Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 571-586.
41. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL.: Chicago University Press. Chicago, IL.: Chicago University Press.
42. Landry, M., & Banville, C. (1992). A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 2, 77-97.
43. Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values: An Essay on the Aims of Science and their Role in Scientific Debate. Their Role in Scientific Debate, Uruversity of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Berkeley.
44. Lawson, T. (1994). A Realist Theory for Economics. In R. Backhouse, New directions in economic methodology (first., pp. 257-285). London: Routledge.
45. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
46. Lawson, T. (1999). Developments in economics as realist social theory. In S. Fleetwood, Critical Realism in Economics (first., pp. 3-20). London: Routledge.
47. Layder, D. (1990). The Realist Image in Social Science. New York: St. Martin's Press (pp. 1-189). New York: St. Martin's Press.
48. Lee, A. S. (1989). A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies. MIS Quarterly, (March), 33-51.
49. Lee, A. S. (1989). Case Studies as Natural Experiments. Human Relations, 42(2), 117-137.
50. Lee, A. S. (1991). Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342-365.
51. Lee, A. S. (1999). Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyond the Approach of Positivism Alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 29-34.
52. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243.
53. Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J. (1997). Information systems and qualitative research. (A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, & J. DeGross) London: Chapman Hall.
54. Lichtenberg, F. R. (1995). The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm-Level Analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3), 201-217.
55. Lyytinen, K. (1992). Information systems and critical theory. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott, Critical Management Studies (Vol. management, pp. pp159-180). London: Sage.
56. Lyytinen, K., & Klein, H. (1985). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In E. Mumford, R. Hirscheim, G. Fitzgerald, & W. T, Research methods in Information Systems (Vol. formations, pp. pp219-236). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
57. Maki, U. (2002). Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. (U. Maki) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-397.
58. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430-444.
59. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
60. McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(1), 66-78.
61. Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151-161.
62. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
63. Mingers, J. (2000). The Contribution of Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for OR/MS and Systems. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(11), 1256.
64. Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240-259.
65. Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 233-249.
66. Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87-103.
67. Mingers, J. (2005). A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: its role within multimethodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(2), 202-219.
68. Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (1997). Multimethodology. (J. Mingers & A. Gill) (pp. 1-442). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
69. Myers, M. (1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 241-243.
70. Nandhakumar, J., & Jones, M. (1997). Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 7, 109-131.
71. Ngwenyama, O. (1991). The critical social theory approach to information systems: problems and challenges. In H. E. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirscheim, Information systems research: Contemporary approaches (Vol. emergenttr, pp. pp267-280). Amsterdam: North Holland.
72. Orlikowski, W.J., & Baroudi, J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
73. Orlikowski, W.J., & Scott S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474.
74. Patomaki, H., & Wight, C. (2000). After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213-237.
75. Petter, S., & Gallivan, M. (2004). Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. (pp. 257-266). Big Island, Hawaii: IEEE.
76. Pratten, S. (2005). Economics as progress: the LSE approach to econometric modelling and critical realism as programmes for research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(2), 179-205.
77. Reed, M. (1985). Redirections in organizational analysis. London: Tavistock.
78. Robey, D. (1996). Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 400-408.
79. Ron, A. (2007). Regression Analysis and the Philosophy of Social Science: A Critical Realist View. Journal of Critical Realism, 1(1).
80. Rorty, R. (1982). Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism. In R. Rorty, Consequences of pragmatism (pp. 160-175). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
81. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. London: Sage (First., pp. 1-301).
82. Smith, M. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16(3), 191-211.
83. Snowden, B., & Vane, H. (1999). Conversation with Milton Friedman. In Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomists (pp. 124-144). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
84. Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1993). Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992. Information Systems Research, 4(4), 299-330.
85. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage (pp. 1-185).
86. Trauth, E., L. Jessup. 2000. Understanding computer-mediated discussions: Positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quart. 24 (March) 43-79.
87. Triplett, J. E. (1999). The Solow Productivity Paradox: What do Computers do to Productivity? The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique, 32(2), 309.
88. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European journal of information systems, 4(2), 74-81. Nature Publishing Group.
89. Walsham, G. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376-394.
90. Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (3rd., pp. 1-890). Thomson, South-Western.