Sequencing design DNA: A set of methodological artifacts for sequencing socio-technical design routines

ICIS 2010 Proceedings - Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Gaskin, James ^a   Lyytinen, Kalle ^a   Thummadi, Veeresh ^a   Schutz, Douglas ^b   Yoo, Youngjin ^b   Weiss, Aaron ^b   Berente, Nicholas ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN TEAM; DISTRIBUTED INTERACTION; GENETIC RESEARCH; PHYSICAL ARTIFACTS; PHYSICAL TOOL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOCIOTECHNICAL;

GENE ENCODING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84870969313     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Abbott, A. A Primer on Sequence Methods, Organization Science (1:4) 1990, pp 375-392.
2. Abbott, A. Sequence Analysis: New Methods for Old Ideas, Annual Review of Sociology (21:1) 1995, p 93.
3. Abbott, A., and Forrest, J. Optimal Matching Methods for Historical Sequences, Journal of Interdisciplinary History (16:3) 1986, pp 471-494.
4. Alexander, C. The Timeless Way of Building Oxford University Press, USA, New York, 1979, p. 561.
5. Arthur, W.B. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves Free Press, 2009, p. 248.
6. Baldwin, C.Y., and Clark, K.B. Managing in the Age of Modularity Harvard Business Review (75:5) 1997, pp 84-93.
7. Berente, N. and Lyytinen, K., (2009), Iteration in Systems Analysis and Design: Cognitive Processes and Representational Artifacts, in Chiang, Siau, & Hardgrave eds, Information Systems Analysis and Design: Techniques, Methodologies, Approaches, and Architectures, M.E. Sharpe, Inc. (AMIS Monograph Series), March 2009.
8. Boland, R., Lyytinen, K., and Yoo, Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction, Organization Science (18:4) 2007, pp 631-647.
9. Boland, R.J., Jr, and Tenkasi, R.V. Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing, Organization Science (6:4) 1995, pp 350-372.
10. Bucciarelli, L.L. Designing Engineers Mit Press, Woburn, MA, 1994, p. 207.
11. Buchanan, R. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues (8:2) 1992, pp 5-21.
12. Carlile, P.R. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development, Organization Science (13:4) 2002, pp 442-455.
13. Cross, N. From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking, Design Research Now) 2007, pp 41-54.
14. Cusumano, M., and Nobeoka, K. Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies. Free Press, NY, 1998.
15. Dougherty, D. A Practice-centered Model of Organizational Renewal Through Product Innovation, Strategic Management Journal (13) 1992, pp 77-92.
16. Eisenhardt, K. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments, Academy of Management Journal (32:3) 1989, pp 543-576.
17. Henderson, J.C., and Cooprider, J. Dimensions of IS Planning and Design Aids: a Functional Model of CASE Technology, Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies) 1994, p 221.
18. Henderson, K. Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering, Science, Technology & Human Values (16:4) 1991, p 448.
19. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Jinsoo, P., and Ram, S. Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly (28:1) 2004, pp 75-105.
20. Kock, N. E-Collaboration and E-Commerce In Virtual Worlds, International Journal of e-Collaboration (4:3) 2008, pp 1-13.
21. Langley, A. Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, The Academy of Management Review (24:4) 1999, pp 691-710.
22. Langley, A., and Truax, J. A Process Study of New Technology Adoption in Smaller Manufacturing Firms, Journal of Management Studies (31:5) 2007, pp 619-652.
23. Lazer, D., Pentl, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., and Gutmann, M. Perspectives Social Science, Computational Social Science, Relation (10:1.119) 2009, p 8099.
24. Leonardi, P.M., and Barley, S.R. Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing, Information and Organization (18:3) 2008, pp 159-176.
25. Malone, T.W., and Crowston, K. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) (26:1) 1994, p 119.
26. Markus, M.L., and Silver, M.S. A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (9:10) 2008, p 5.
27. McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and performance Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
28. Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, 1982, p. 248.
29. Orlikowski, W.J., and Scott, S.V. Chapter 10: Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization, The Academy of Management Annals (2) 2008, pp 433-474.
30. Pentland, B.T. Sequential Variety in Work Processes, Organization Science (14:5) 2003, pp 528-540.
31. Rosenman, M.A., and Gero, J.S. Modelling Multiple Views of Design Objects in a Collaborative Environment, Computer-Aided Design (28:3) 1996, pp 193-205.
32. Sabherwal, R., and Robey, D. An Empirical Taxonomy of Implementation Processes Based on Sequences of Events in Information System Development, Organization Science (4:4) 1993, pp 548-576.
33. Shoval, N., and Isaacson, M. Sequence Alignment as a Method for Human Activity Analysis in Space and Time, Annals of the Association of American Geographers (97:2) 2007, pp 282-297.
34. Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.
35. Sluys, R. The notion of homology in current comparative biology, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research (34:3) 2009, pp 145-152.
36. Smolander, K., Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.P., and Marttiin, P. "MetaEdit-A Flexible Graphical Environment for Methodology Modelling," Springer, 1991, pp. 168-193.
37. Tolvanen, J.P., and Rossi, M. MetaEdit+: Defining and Using Domain-specific Modeling Languages and Code Generators, ACM, 2003, pp. 92-93.
38. Van de Ven, A.H., and Poole, M.S. Methods for Studying Innovation Development in The Minnesota Innovation Research Program, Organization Science (1:3) 1990, pp 313-335.
39. Wilson, C. Activity Patterns of Canadian Women: Application of ClustalG Sequence Alignment Software, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (1777:-1) 2001, pp 55-67.
40. Wilson, C. Reliability of sequence-alignment analysis of social processes: Monte Carlo tests of ClustalG software, Environment and Planning A (38:1) 2006, p 187.
41. Wilson, C., Harvey, A.S., and Thompson, J. Clustalg: Software for Analysis of Activities and Sequential Events Methods, in: Workshop on Sequence Alignment, October, Halifax, 2005.
42. Yoo, Y. Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing, MIS Quarterly, 2010.
43. Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Jr., and Lyytinen, K. From Organization Design to Organization Designing, Organization Science (17:2), March 1, 2006 2006, pp 215-229.
44. Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., and Boland, R. "Innovation in the Digital Era: Digitization and Four Classes of Innovation Networks, Working Paper, Temple University.