The limits of human rights law in human development

Facing the Limits of the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 355-374

  Vandenhole, Wouter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870940667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79856-9_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. R. Dhavan, "Ambedkar's Prophecy: Poverty of Human Rights in India", Journal of the Indian Law Institute 1994, 36, 8, 27.
2. P. Alston, "Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen Through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals", Human Rights Quarterly 2005, 27, 755.
3. A. Seidman, R. Seidman and T.W. Wälde (eds.), Making Development Work. Legislative Reform for Institutional Transformation and Good Governance (The Hague: Kluwer, 1999).
4. I. Shivji, "The Rule of Law and Ujamaa in the Ideological Formation of Tanzania", Social and Legal Studies 1995, 4, 147, 150-151.
5. W. Vandenhole, "Human Rights Law, Development and Social Action Litigation in India", Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law 2002, 2, 136.
6. K. De Feyter, Human Rights. Social Justice in the Age of the Market (London: Zed Books, 2005) 60.
7. U. Baxi, "Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India", in N. Tiruchelvam and R. Coomaraswamy (eds.), The Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987) 39.
8. P.N. Bhagwati, "Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1985, 23, 561, 571.
9. C.D. Cunningham, "Public Interest Litigation in Indian Supreme Court: A Study in the Light of American Experience", in J. Kapur (ed.), Supreme Court on Public Interest Litigation. Cases and Materials. The Debate over Original Intent I (New Delhi: LIPS, s.d.) A-74 - A-76.
10. M. Gomez, In the Public Interest (Legal Aid Centre, University of Colombo, 1993) 79.
11. Baxi, l.c., .
12. Cunningham, l.c., A-80.
13. Cunningham, l.c., A-80.
14. K. De Vey Mestdagh, "The Right to Development", Netherlands International Law Review 1981, 25, 30, 53;.
15. P. de Waart, "State Rights and Human Rights as Two Sides of One Principle of International Law: The Right to Development", in P. de Waart, P. Peters and E. Denters (eds.), International Law and Development (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988) 372;.
16. M. Kenig-Witkowska, "The UN Declaration on the Right to Development in the Light of its Travaux Préparatoires", in P. de Waart, P. Peters and E. Denters (eds.), International Law and Development (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988) 383;.
17. A. Rosas, "The Right to Development", in A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. A Textbook (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995) 254-255.
18. P. Alston, "Some Notes on the Concept of the Right to Development", in D. Prémon (ed.), Essais sur le concept de 'droit de vivre' en mémoire de Yougindra Khushalani (Brussels: Bruylant, 1988), 84.
19. K. De Feyter, The Human Rights Approach to Development II (Antwerp: University of Antwerp, 1992) 555-556, .
20. UN Doc.E/CN.4/2006/26, Report of the Working Group on the Right to Development on its seventh session (Geneva, 9-13 January 2006), para. 26).
21. F. Coomans and M. T. Kamminga (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004);.
22. S. Skogly, Beyond National Borders: States' Human Rights Obligations in International Cooperation (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2006).
23. R. Künnemann, "Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", in F. Coomans and M.T. Kamminga (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004) 212-213;.
24. M. Sepúlveda, The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2003) 373-374;.
25. M. Craven, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - A Perspective on its Development (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) 147-149.
26. UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/47, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Jean Ziegler, 24 January 2005, at 48;.
27. F. Coomans, "Some Remarks on the Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", in F. Coomans and M.T. Kamminga (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004) 190.
28. F. Coomans, "Some Remarks on the Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", in F. Coomans and M.T. Kamminga (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), Ibid., 193.
29. F. Coomans, "Some Remarks on the Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", in F. Coomans and M.T. Kamminga (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), Ibid., 199.
30. M. Craven, l.c., 148.
31. W. Vandenhole, "Third State Obligations under the ICESCR: a Case Study of the EU Sugar Regime", Nordic Journal of International Law 2007, 76, 73-100.
32. K. De Feyter, World Development Law. Sharing Responsibility for Development (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001) 156.
33. K. De Feyter, World Development Law. Sharing Responsibility for Development (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001), Ibid., 45.
34. K. De Feyter, World Development Law. Sharing Responsibility for Development (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001), Ibid., 37-46.
35. K. De Feyter, World Development Law. Sharing Responsibility for Development (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001), Ibid., 156.
36. J. Donnelly, "In Search of the Unicorn: The Jurisprudence and Politics of the Right to Development", California Western International Law Journal 1985, 15, 473, 508.
37. Indian Supreme Court, Edwards and Lewis v the United Kingdom, [2004] ECR at [46-48].
38. Indian Supreme Court, Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of India, [1984] AIR at [13].
39. M. Nowak, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. CCPR Commentary (Kehl: Engel, 1993) 458.
40. A. Bayefski, "The Principle of Equality or Non-Discrimination in International Law", Human Rights Law Journal 1990/1-2, 11, 1, 2.
41. A. Bayefski, "The Principle of Equality or Non-Discrimination in International Law", Human Rights Law Journal 1990/1-2, 11, Ibid., 1.
42. B.G. Ramcharan, "Equality and Nondiscrimination", in L. Henkin (ed.), The International Bill of Rights. The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981) 246.
43. W. Vandenhole, Non-Discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005).
44. S. Gosepath, "Equality", in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005) at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2005/entries/equality/(last visited 28 June 2006).
45. A. Cassese, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) 88.
46. A. Cassese, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), Ibid., 89-91.
47. K. De Feyter (2001), l.c., 43 and 153.
48. S. Harwood, Judicial Activism: A Restrained Defense (San Francisco: Austin & Winfield, 1996) 2.
49. S. Harwood, Judicial Activism: A Restrained Defense (San Francisco: Austin & Winfield, 1996), Ibid., 80-85.
50. S. Harwood, Judicial Activism: A Restrained Defense (San Francisco: Austin & Winfield, 1996), Ibid., 85-96.
51. R. Dhavan, Judge and Be Judged. India's Judiciary - An Institution of Governance, PILSARC Working Paper no. 154 (New Delhi: PILSARC, 1997), at 18.
52. M. Cappelletti, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989) 30-31.
53. S. Harwood, l.c., 108-110.
54. P.N. Bhagwati, l.c., 576;.
55. R. Dhavan (1997), l.c., 14 and 18.
56. adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the prevention on crime and the treatment of offenders (Milan 26 August - 6 September 1985).
57. the "Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary in the Law Asea Region" of the Law Association of Asia and the Pacific (1995).
58. (published in Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law 2000, 158-164).
59. 'Caïro Declaration' of the Third Conference of the Francophone Ministers of Justice (1995)).
60. World Conference on Human Rights, "Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action", A/CONF.157/23, part I, at 27.
61. Y. Ghai, "The Rule of Law, Legitimacy and Governance", International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 1986, 14, 179-210;.
62. I. Shivji, l.c., 147.
63. I. Shivji, The Concept of Human Rights in Africa (London: Codesria, 1989).
64. I. Shivji, l.c., 147.
65. T. Koopmans, "The roots of judicial activism", in F. Matscher and H. Petzold (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension. Studies in Honour of G.J. Wiarda (Cologne: Heymanns, 1988) 318-319.
66. M. Ghouse, "The Two Faces of Judicial Activism", in K.L. Bhatia (ed.), Judicial Activism and Social Change (New Delhi: Deep & Deep, 1990) 107-108.
67. Indian Supreme Court, Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of India, [1984] AIR at [9].
68. Indian Supreme Court, Rakesh Chandra Narayan v State of Bihar, PIL-SCALE at [29].
69. 60 CESCR GC No 3 (1990), The Nature of States Parties Obligations (Article 2, para. 1) at 8.
70. S. Harwood, l.c., 108-110.
71. P.N. Bhagwati, l.c., 576;.
72. R. Dhavan (1997), l.c., 14 and 18.
73. Indian Supreme Court, People's Union for Democratic Rights v Union of India, PIL-SCALE at 2.