A comparison between volumetric data generated by voxel-based morphometry and manual parcellation of multimodal regions of the frontal lobe

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1957-1963

  Lindberg, Olof ^a   Manzouri, A ^a   Westman, E ^a   Wahlund, L O ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; FRONTAL LOBE; FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROANATOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORBITAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FRONTOTEMPORAL LOBAR DEGENERATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SIZE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84870938653     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3093     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB. Structural brain changes in aging: courses, causes and cognitive consequences. Rev Neurosci 2010;21:187-221
2. Shaw P, Kabani NJ, Lerch JP, et al. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 2008;28:3586-94
3. Raz N, Gunning-Dixon F, Head D, et al. Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:377-96 (Pubitemid 38220973)
4. Tisserand DJ, Pruessner JC, Sanz Arigita EJ, et al. Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: anMRIstudy to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2002;17:657-69 (Pubitemid 35317001)
5. Westlye LT, Walhovd KB, Dale AM, et al. Differentiating maturational and aging-related changes of the cerebral cortex by use of thickness and signal intensity. Neuroimage 2010;52:172-85
6. Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, et al. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:1676-89 (Pubitemid 41447032)
7. Walhovd KB, Westlye LT, Amlien I, et al. Consistent neuroanatomical agerelated volume differences across multiple samples. Neurobiol Aging 2011;32:916-32
8. McGinnis SM, Brickhouse M, Pascual B, et al. Age-related changes in the thickness of cortical zones in humans. Brain Topogr 2011;24:279-91
9. Whitwell JL, Jack CR Jr. Comparisons between Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and normal aging with brain mapping. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2005;16:409-25 (Pubitemid 44699399)
10. McEvoy LK, Fennema-Notestine C, Roddey JC, et al. Alzheimer disease: quantitative structural neuroimaging for detection and prediction of clinical and structural changes in mild cognitive impairment. Radiology 2009;251:195-205
11. Tartaglia MC, Rosen HJ, Miller BL. Neuroimaging in dementia. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8:82-92
12. Kim EJ, Sidhu M, Gaus SE, et al. Selective frontoinsular von Economo neuron and fork cell loss in early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Cereb Cortex 2012;22:251-59
13. Seeley WW, Carlin DA, Allman JM, et al. Early frontotemporal dementia targets neurons unique to apes and humans. Ann Neurol 2006;60:660-67 (Pubitemid 46048483)
14. Mesulam MM. From sensation to cognition. Brain 1998;121(Pt 6):1013-52
15. Fischl B, Rajendran N, Busa E, et al. Cortical folding patterns and predicting cytoarchitecture. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:1973-80 (Pubitemid 352019918)
16. Amunts K, Schleicher A, Zilles K. Cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex-more than localization. Neuroimage 2007;37:1061- 65; discussion 1066-68
17. McCormick LM, Ziebell S, Nopoulos P, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex: an MRI-based parcellation method. Neuroimage 2006;32:1167-75 (Pubitemid 44278678)
18. Fornito A, Wood SJ, Whittle S, et al. Variability of the paracingulate sulcus and morphometry of the medial frontal cortex: associations with cortical thickness, surface area, volume, and sulcal depth.HumBrain Mapp 2008;29:222-36 (Pubitemid 351294950)
19. Lindberg O, Ostberg P, Zandbelt BB, et al. Cortical morphometric subclassification of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1233-39
20. Looi JC, Lindberg O, Zandbelt BB, et al. Caudate nucleus volumes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: differential atrophy in subtypes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1537-43
21. Looi JC, Svensson L, Lindberg O, et al. Putaminal volume in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease: differential volumes in dementia subtypes and controls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1552-60
22. Looi JC, Walterfang M, Styner M, et al. Shape analysis of the neostriatum in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer's disease, and controls. Neuroimage 2010;51:970-86
23. Looi JC, Walterfang M, Styner M, et al. Shape analysis of the neostriatum in subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: neuroanatomically significant regional morphologic change. Psychiatry Res 2011;191:98-111
24. Andersson C. Predictors of cognitive decline in memory clinic patients. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute, 2007
25. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546-54
26. Suzuki M, Zhou SY, Takahashi T, et al. Differential contributions of prefrontal and temporolimbic pathology to mechanisms of psychosis. Brain 2005;128: 2109-22 (Pubitemid 41253278)
27. Fornito A, Whittle S, Wood SJ, et al. The influence of sulcal variability on morphometry of the human anterior cingulate and paracingulate cortex. Neuroimage 2006;33:843-54 (Pubitemid 44739997)
28. Crespo-Facorro B, Kim J, Andreasen NC, et al. Cerebral cortex: a topographic segmentation method using magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res 2000;100:97-126
29. Malykhin NV, Bouchard TP, Ogilvie CJ, et al. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis and reconstruction of amygdala and hippocampal head, body and tail. Psychiatry Res 2007;155:155-65 (Pubitemid 46874910)
30. Eritaia J, Wood SJ, Stuart GW, et al. An optimized method for estimating intracranial volume from magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:973-77
31. Ashburner J, Andersson JL, Friston KJ. Image registration using a symmetric prior-in three dimensions. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;9:212-25 (Pubitemid 30194717)
32. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, et al. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21-36 (Pubitemid 32552740)
33. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004; 23(Suppl 1):S208-19 (Pubitemid 39421720)
34. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143-55 (Pubitemid 35253488)
35. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45-57 (Pubitemid 32293419)
36. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001;5:143-56 (Pubitemid 35282800)
37. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, et al. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825-41 (Pubitemid 35317016)
38. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-28
39. Seeley WW, Crawford RK, Zhou J, et al. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron 2009;62:42-52
40. Seeley WW, Crawford R, Rascovsky K, et al. Frontal paralimbic network atrophy in very mild behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 2008;65:249-55 (Pubitemid 351240789)