National identity infrastructures: Lessons from the United Kingdom

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 386 AICT, Issue , 2012, Pages 44-55

  Martin, Aaron K ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biometrics; case study research; e government; failure; identification technology; organizing visions; surveillance

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY; CASE STUDY RESEARCH; E-GOVERNMENT; FACIAL RECOGNITION; IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY; IDENTITY CARDS; IRIS SCANNING; NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE; POLITICAL CONTEXT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; FACE RECOGNITION; SPACE SURVEILLANCE;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 84870937110     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33332-3_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Chau, A., Stephens, G., Jamieson, R.: Biometrics Acceptance - Perceptions of Use of Biometrics. In: Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, pp. 1-6 (2004)
2. Clarke, N.L., Furnell, S.M., Rodwell, P.M., Reynolds, P.L.: Acceptance of Subscriber Authentication Methods For Mobile Telephony Devices. Computers & Security 21(3), 220-228 (2002)
3. Cragg Ross Dawson: Identity cards - People with special issues: Response to the proposed customer experience report (2004)
4. Davis, C.J., Hufnagel, E.M.: Through the Eyes of Experts: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective on the Automation of Fingerprint Work. Management Information Systems Quarterly 31, 681-704 (2007)
5. Deane, F., Barrelle, K., Henderson, R., Mahar, D.: Perceived acceptability of biometric security systems. Computers and Security 14(3), 225-231 (1995)
6. Fairclough, N.: Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, New York (2010)
7. Firth, D.: The Organizing Vision for Customer Relationship Management. In: Proceedings of the 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (2001)
8. Furnell, S.M., Dowland, P.S., Illingworth, H.M., Reynolds, P.L.: Authentication and Supervision: A Survey of User Attitudes. Computers & Security 19(6), 529-539 (2000)
9. Furnell, S., Evangelatos, K.: Public awareness and perceptions of biometrics. Computer Fraud & Security 2007(1), 8-13 (2007)
10. Heckle, R.R., Patrick, A.S., Ozok, A.: Perception and acceptance of fingerprint biometric technology. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 153-154. ACM, Pittsburgh (2007)
11. Ho, G., Stephens, G., Jamieson, R.: Biometric Authentication Adoption Issues. In: Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Perth, Western Australia (2003)
12. Home Office: Entitlement Cards and Identity Fraud: A Consultation Paper. Stationery Office, London (2002)
13. Home Office: Identity Cards Briefing (2005)
14. Identity & Passport Service: Strategic Action Plan for the National Identity Scheme: Safeguarding Your Identity. Home Office, London (2006)
15. Identity & Passport Service: National Identity Scheme Strategic Supplier Framework Prospectus. Home Office, London (2007)
16. James, T., Pirim, T., Boswell, K., Reithel, B., Barkhi, R.: Determining the Intention to Use Biometric Devices: An Application and Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 18(3), 1-24 (2006)
17. Jones, L.A., Antón, A.I., Earp, J.B.: Towards Understanding User Perceptions of Authentication Technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Workshop on Privacy in Electronic Society, pp. 91-98. ACM, Alexandria (2007)
18. Lettice, J.: ID card astroturf - No2ID beats the truth out of IPS. The Register (2010)
19. Miles, M.B.: Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4), 590-601 (1979)
20. Moody, J.: Public Perceptions of Biometric Devices: The Effect of Misinformation on Acceptance and Use. In: Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Rockhampton, Australia, pp. 753-761 (2004)
21. O'Gorman, L.: Comparing Passwords, Tokens, and Biometrics for User Authentication. Proceedings of the IEEE 91(12), 2021-2040 (2003)
22. Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., Feltz, F.: Interoperability of E-Government Information Systems: Issues of Identification and Data Sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(4), 29-52 (2007)
23. Perakslis, C., Wolk, R.: Social Acceptance of RFID as a Biometric Security Method. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 25, 34-42 (2006)
24. Ponemon Institute: Global Study on the Public's Perceptions about Identity Management. Unisys Corporation, USA (2006)
25. Prior, L.: Using Documents in Social Research. Sage, London (2003)
26. Swanson, E.B.: Talking the IS Innovation Walk. In: Wynn, E.H., Whitley, E.A., Myers, M.D., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Global and Organisational Discourse about Information Technology, pp. 15-32. Kluwer, Boston (2003)
27. Swanson, E.B., Ramiller, N.: The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation. Organization Science 8(5), 458-474 (1997)
28. Swanson, E.B., Ramiller, N.C.: Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 28(4), 553-583 (2004)
29. Wang, P.: Popular Concepts beyond Organizations: Exploring New Dimensions of Information Technology Innovations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(1), 1-30 (2009)
30. Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)
31. Whitley, E.A.: Perceptions of Government Technology, Surveillance and Privacy: the UK Identity Cards Scheme. In: Neyland, D., Goold, B. (eds.) New Directions in Privacy and Surveillance, Willan, Cullompton, UK, pp. 133-156 (2009)
32. Whitley, E.A., Hosein, G.: Global Identity Policies and Technology: Do We Understand the Question? Global Policy 1(2), 209-215 (2010)