Towards understanding user perceptions of authentication technologies

WPES'07 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Workshop on Privacy in Electronic Society

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 91-98

  Jones, Laurie A ^a   Antón, Annie I ^b   Earp, Julia B ^c  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

authentication; biometrics; digital identities; tokens; user perceptions

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION TECHNOLOGY; DIGITAL IDENTITY; END USERS; FINANCIAL DOMAINS; HAND GEOMETRY; PRIVACY AND SECURITY; TOKENS; USER PERCEPTIONS;

BIOMETRICS; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY;

AUTHENTICATION;

EID: 79955133521     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1314333.1314352     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Antón, A.I. and J. Earp. Strategies for Developing Policies and Requirements for Secure E-Commerce Systems. Recent Advances in E-Commerce Security and Privacy, ed. by A.K. Ghosh, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 29-46, 2001.
2. Antón, A.I. and C. Potts. Functional paleontology: the evolution of user-visible system services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Volume 29, pp. 151-166, 2003.
3. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Tracking Public Perceptions of Biometrics, 2003. Accessed April 13, 2007 at http:// www.cic.gc.ca/english/ press/03/poll-biometrics-e.pdf.
4. Deane, F., K. Barrelle, R. Henderson and D. Mahar. Perceived acceptability of biometric security systems. Computers & Security Volume 14, pp. 225-231, 1995.
5. Earp, J.B., A.I. Antón, L. Aiman-Smith, and W.H. Stufflebeam. Examining Internet Privacy Policies Within the Context of User Privacy Values. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(2), pp. 227-237, 2005.
6. Furnell, S. and Evangelatos, K. Public awareness and perceptions of biometrics. Computer Fraud and Security , Volume 1, pp. 8-13, 2007.
7. Furnell, S.M., P.S. Dowland, H.M. Illingworth and P.L. Reynolds. Authentication and Supervision: A Survey of User Attitudes. Computers & Security, Volume 19, pp. 529-539, 2000.
8. Giesing, I. User perceptions related to identification through biometrics within electronic business. Master's thesis, University of Pretoria, 2003.
9. Green, N.A. Establishing Public Confidence in the Viability of Fingerprint Biometric Technology. Master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 2005.
10. James, T., T. Pirim, K. Boswell, B. Reithel and R. Barkhi. Determining the Intention to Use Biometric Devices: An Application and Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing Volume 18, pp. 1-24, 2006.
11. Magnuson, G. and P. Reid. Privacy and Identity Management Survey: Summary of Results and Findings. 2005, accessed February 12, 2007 at http://www.eds.com/services/whitepapers/downloads/privacy-survey.pdf.
12. Moody, J. Public Perceptions of Biometric Devices: The Effect of Misinformation on Acceptance and Use. Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Joint Conference, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia, 25-28 June 2004.
13. Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
14. O'Gorman, L. Comparing Passwords, Tokens, and Biometrics for User Authentication. Proceedings of the IEEE Volume 91, pp. 2021-2040, 2003.
15. Perakslis, C. and R. Wolk. Social Acceptance of RFID as a Biometric Security Method. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Fall 2006, pp. 34-42.
16. Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S. and Jain, A.K. Biometric Recognition: Security and Privacy Concerns. IEEE Security & Privacy Volume 1, pp. 33-42, 2003.
17. Satchell, C., G. Shanks, S. Howard, and J. Murphy. Beyond security: implications for the future of federated digital identity management systems. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the Computer-Human interaction Special interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-Human interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments, Sydney, Australia, 20-24 November 2006.
18. Strickland, L.S. and L.E. Hunt. Technology, Security, and Individual Privacy: New Tools, New Threats, and New Public Perceptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Volume 56, pp. 221-234, 2005.
19. Vethman, A.J. RFID and consumers. Capgemini, March 1, 2005, accessed March 5, 2007 at http://www.capgemini.com/news/2005/Capgemini-European-RFID- report.pdf.
20. Woodward, J.D., K.W. Webb, E.M. Newton, M. Bradley and D. Rubenson. Army Biometric Applications. RAND Corporation, 2001.