Animal Detection Precedes Access to Scene Category

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Crouzet, Sébastien M ^a,b   Joubert, Olivier R ^a   Thorpe, Simon J ^a   Fabre Thorpe, Michèle ^a  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; DECISION MAKING; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84870933488     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051471     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Thorpe SJ, Fize D, Marlot C, (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381: 520-522.
2. Rousselet GA, Macé MJ-M, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2003) Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Journal of Vision 3: 440-455.
3. Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ, (2006) Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research 46: 1762-1776.
4. Crouzet SM, Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ, (2010) Fast saccades towards face: Face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision 10: 1-17.
5. Potter MC, (1976) Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 2: 509-522.
6. Evans K, Treisman A, (2005) Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31: 1476-1492 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1476.
7. New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J, (2007) Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National 104: 16598.
8. Rousselet GA, Macé MJ-M, Thorpe SJ, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2007) Limits of event-related potential differences in tracking object processing speed. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 19: 1241-1258 doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1241.
9. VanRullen R, Thorpe SJ, (2001) The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 13: 454-461.
10. Rousselet GA, Joubert OR, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2005) How long to get to the "gist" of real-world natural scenes? Visual Cogn 12: 852-877.
11. Oliva A, Torralba A, (2001) Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision 42: 145-175.
12. Oliva A, Torralba A, (2006) Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research 155: 23.
13. Oliva A, Torralba A, (2007) The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11: 520-527.
14. Torralba A, Oliva A, (2003) Statistics of natural image categories. Network (Bristol, England) 14: 391-412.
15. Greene MR, Oliva A, (2009) Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology 58: 137-176 doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001.Recognition.
16. Greene MR, Oliva A, (2009) The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science 20: 464-472.
17. Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC, (1982) Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology 14: 143-177.
18. Joubert OR, Fize D, Rousselet GA, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2008) Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. Journal of Vision 8: 1-18 doi:10.1167/8.13.11.Introduction.
19. Davenport JL, Potter MC, (2004) Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci 15: 559-564.
20. Fize D, Cauchoix M, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2011) Humans and monkeys share visual representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 7635-7640 doi:10.1073/pnas.1016213108.
21. Joubert OR, Rousselet GA, Fize D, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2007) Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference. Vision research 47: 3286-3297.
22. Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E, (1998) A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20: 1254-1259.
23. Walther D, Koch C, (2006) Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks 19: 1395-1407.
24. Scholte HS, Ghebreab S, Waldorp L, Smeulders AWM, Lamme VAF, (2009) Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. Journal of 9: 1-15 doi:10.1167/9.4.29.Introduction.
25. Ghebreab S, Smeulders AWM, Scholte HS, Lamme VAF (2009) A biologically plausible model for rapid natural image identification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: 1-9.
26. Serre T, Wolf L, Bileschi S, Riesenhuber M, Poggio TA, (2007) Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29: 411-426.
27. Serre T, Oliva A, Poggio TA, (2007) A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 6424-6429.
28. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature neuroscience 2: 1019-1025.
29. Crouzet SM, Serre T, (2011) What are the visual features underlying rapid object recognition? Frontiers in Psychology 2: 1-15 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00326.
30. Hung CCP, Kreiman G, Poggio TA, Dicarlo JJ, (2005) Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex. Science 2164: 863-866.
31. Liu H, Agam Y, Madsen JR, Kreiman G, (2009) Timing, timing, timing: Fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron 62: 281-290 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.025.
32. Vanrullen R, Thorpe SJ, (2001) Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception 30: 655-668.
33. Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS, (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature reviews Neuroscience 5: 495-501 doi:10.1038/nrn1411.
34. Duncan J, Humphreys GW, (1989) Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological review 96: 433-458.
35. Drewes J, Trommershauser J, Gegenfurtner KR, (2011) Parallel visual search and rapid animal detection in natural scenes. Journal of Vision 11: 1-21 doi:10.1167/11.2.20.Introduction.
36. Li FF, VanRullen R, Koch C, Perona P, (2002) Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 9596-9601 doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599.
37. Rousselet GA, Fabre-Thorpe M, Thorpe SJ, (2002) Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience 5: 629-630.
38. VanRullen R, Reddy LL, Koch C, (2004) Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 4-14 doi:10.1162/089892904322755502.
39. Vanrullen R, (2009) Binding hardwired versus on-demand feature conjunctions. Visual Cognition 17: 103-119 doi:10.1080/13506280802196451.
40. Treisman A, (2006) How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual cognition 14: 411-443 doi:10.1080/13506280500195250.
41. Joubert OR, Rousselet GA, Fize D, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2009) Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise. Journal of Vision 9: 1-16.
42. Loschky LC, Larson AM, (2010) The natural/man-made distinction is made before basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing. Visual Cognition 18: 513-536 doi:10.1080/13506280902937606.
43. Delorme A, Richard G, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2010) Key visual features for rapid categorization of animals in natural scenes. Frontiers in psychology 1: 21 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00021.
44. Lock T, Baizer J, Bender DB, (2003) Distribution of corticotectal cells in macaque. Experimental brain research 151: 455-470 doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1500-y.
45. May PJ, (2006) The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar structure and connections. Progress in Brain Research 151: 321-378 doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51011-2.
46. Webster MJ, Bachevalier J, Ungerleider LG, (1993) Subcortical connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 335: 73-91.
47. Hollingworth A, Henderson JM, (1998) Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? J Exp Psychol Gen 127: 398-415.
48. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A, (1999) High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 243-271.
49. Macé MJ-M, Joubert OR, Nespoulous J-L, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2009) The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird. PloS one 4: e5927 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005927.
50. Masquelier T, Thorpe SJ, (2007) Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Computational Biology 3: e31 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030031.
51. Fabre-Thorpe M, (2011) The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization. Frontiers in psychology 2: 243 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00243.
52. Võ M, Henderson J, (2010) The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. Journal of Vision 10: 1-13 doi:10.1167/10.3.14.Introduction.
53. Bar M, (2004) Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 617-629 doi:10.1038/nrn1476.
54. Brainard DH, (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial vision 10: 433-436.
55. Fan R, Chang K, Hsieh C, Wang X, Lin C, (2008) LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 9: 1871-1874.