Mid-term equivalent survival of medial and lateral unicondylar knee replacement: An analysis of data from a National Joint Registry

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1641-1648

  Baker, P N ^a   Jameson, S S ^a,b   Deehan, D J ^a,c   Gregg, P J ^a,b   Porter, M ^a,d   Tucker, K ^a,e  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d WRIGHTINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE IMPLANT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FRACTURE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INFECTION; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PAIN; LATERAL UNICONDYLAR KNEE REPLACEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIAL UNICONDYLAR KNEE REPLACEMENT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NEOPLASM; POST TREATMENT SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REGISTER; REIMPLANTATION; SURVIVAL; SYNOVITIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; WALES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870917134     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29416     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 8th Annual report, 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/ ReportsPublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
2. Price J, Dodd CA, Svard UG, Murray DW. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1488-1492. (Pubitemid 41723090)
3. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:52-57.
4. Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficiency. Knee 2009;16;473-8.:.
5. Davidson D, Graves S, Tomkins A, et al. Australian Orthopaedic Association: annual report 2009: hip and knee arthroplasty September 1999 to December 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport- 2009.pdf (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
6. Lidgren L, Robertsson O, W-Dahl A The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: annual report 2009. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/113- SVK2009ENGL1.0.pdf (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
7. Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow up study of 50493 knee replacements from the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 2008;79:499-507.
8. Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:1539-1548.
9. Gunther T, Murray D, Miller R. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Oxford meniscal knee. Knee 1996;3:33-39. (Pubitemid 126383474)
10. Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:1126-1130.
11. Argenson JA, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2686-2693.
12. Lustig S, Elguindy A, Servien E, et al. 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1318-1325.
13. Sah AP, Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach: study with an average five-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:1948-1954. (Pubitemid 350195025)
14. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:13-17. (Pubitemid 43162980)
15. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. Third ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
16. No authors listed. American Society of Anesthesiologists: ASA physical status classification system. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
17. Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less travelled. Orthopaedics 2005;28:983-984. (Pubitemid 41341595)
18. Rothwell A, Taylor J, Wright M, et al. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry: eleven year report, 2010. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/reports/A2D65CA3.pdf (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
19. No authors listed. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: annual report 2010. http://nrlweb.ihelse.net (date last accessed 16 July 2012).
20. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69-469.
21. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:198-204.
22. Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stöckl B. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 2011;82:131-135.
23. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: reinterpretation of knee Joint Registry data. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1628-1631.
24. Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, et al. Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006;13:365-370. (Pubitemid 44311493)
25. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Reinders J, et al. Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 2011;7:710-715.
26. Baker PN, Petheram T, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010:In press.
27. Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, et al. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:519-525. (Pubitemid 46371267)
28. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:111-119. (Pubitemid 37413628)
29. Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005;38:197-208. (Pubitemid 39642940)