Evolution of attention in learning

Computational Models of Conditioning

Volumn 9780521113649, Issue , 2010, Pages 10-52

  Kruschke, John K ^a   Hullinger, Richard A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FITNESS; ADAPTIVE VALUE; ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING; OVERALL ACCURACIES; SELECTIVE PRESSURE; SIMULATED EVOLUTIONS;

BIOLOGY;

EID: 84870899934     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511760402.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Burgos, J. E. (2007). Evolving artificial neural networks in Pavlovian environments. In J. W. Donahoe and V. Packard-Dorsel, eds., Neural-Network Models of Cognition: Biobehavioral Foundations. The Netherlands: North-Holland Elsevier, pp. 58-80.
2. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170-178.
3. Clark, C. W. & Dukas, R. (2003). The behavioral ecology of a cognitive constraint: limited attention. Behavioral Ecology, 14(2), 151-156.
4. Dibbets, P., Maes, J. H. R., Boermans, K. & Vossen, J. M. H. (2001). Contextual dependencies in predictive learning. Memory, 9(1), 29-38.
5. Dukas, R. (2004). Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 63, 197-210.
6. Edmonds, B. & Norling, E. (2007). Integrating learning and inference in multi-agent systems using cognitive context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4442, 142.
7. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J. & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32(1), 108-154.
9. Hall, G. & Channell, S. (1985). A comparison of intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 10, 285-295.
10. Hinton, G. E. & Plaut, D. C. (1987). Using fast weights to deblur old memories. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 177-186.
11. Johnston, T. D. (1982). Selective costs and benefits in the evolution of learning. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 12, 65-106.
12. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church, eds., Punishment. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 279-296.
13. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
14. Kruschke, J. K. (1996a). Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 3-26.
15. Kruschke, J. K. (1996b). Dimensional relevance shifts in category learning. Connection Science, 8, 201-223.
16. Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863.
17. Kruschke, J. K. (2003). Attentional theory is a viable explanation of the inverse base rate effect: a reply to Winman, Wennerholm, and Juslin (2003). Journal of Experimental sychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1396-1400.
18. Kruschke, J. K. (2009). Highlighting: a canonical experiment. In B. Ross, ed., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 51. Illinois: Elsevier, pp. 153-185.
19. Kruschke, J. K. & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 636-645.
20. Kruschke, J. K., Kappenman, E. S. & Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 830-845.
21. Little, D. R. & Lewandowsky, S. (2009). Beyond non-utilization: irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 530-550.
22. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
24. McCloskey, M. & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: the sequential learning problem. In G. Bower, ed., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 24. New York: Academic Press, pp. 109-165.
25. Medin, D. L. & Edelson, S. M. (1988). Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 68-85.
26. Mery, F. & Kawecki, T. J. (2003). A fitness cost of learning ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1532), 2465-2469.
27. Miller, G. F. & Todd, P. M. (1990). Exploring adaptive agency i: theory and methods for simulating evolution of learning. In D. S. Touretzky, J. L. Elman, T. J. Sejnowski, and G. E. Hinton, eds., Proceedings of the 1990 Connectionist Models Summer School. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 65-80.
28. Miller, R. R. & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower, ed., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 22. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 51-92.
29. Moore, B. R. (2004). The evolution of learning. Biological Review, 79, 301-335.
30. Nelson, J. B. & Sanjuan, M. (2006). A context-specific latent inhibition effect in a human conditioned suppression task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 1003-1020.
31. Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C. & Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory and Cognition, 22, 352-369.
32. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J. & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
33. Raine, N. E. & Chittka, L. (2008). The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1636), 803-808.
34. Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy, eds., Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64-99.
35. Rosas, J. M. & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 461-474.
36. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by back-propagating errors. In D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Schmajuk, N. A. (2002). Latent Inhibition and Its Neural Substrates: From Animal Experiments to Schizophrenia. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
38. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W. & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: a neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
39. Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. L. & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75(13). (Whole No. 517.)
40. Slamecka, N. J. (1968). A methodological analysis of shift paradigms in human discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 423-438.
41. Todd, P. M. & Miller, G. F. (1991). Exploring adaptive agency ii: simulating the evolution of adaptive learning. In J.-A. Meyer and S. W. Wilson, eds., From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 306-315.
42. Yang, L.-X. & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. Learning and Memory, 29(4), 663-679.