Crossing the ditch: Applying the e-learning maturity model to australian institutions

ASCILITE 2009 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 625-634

  Marshall, Stephen ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Acode benchmarks; Cmm; E learning; Emm; Maturity models; Process improvement; Spice

Indexed keywords

ACODE BENCHMARKS; CMM; EMM; MATURITY MODEL; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SPICE;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84870885103     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. ACODE. (2008). ACODE Benchmarks. Retrieved August 24, 2009, from http://www.acode.edu.au/projects_resources.php, Canberra: Australasian Council on Open, Distance and E-Learning.
2. Bacsich, P. (2008). Higher Education Academy/JISC E-learning Benchmarking Phase 2 Overview Report. Report to the Higher Education Academy 14pp. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://elearning.heacademy.ac.uk/weblogs/benchmarking/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/BenchmarkingPhase2_BELAreport.pdf
3. Beames, S., Mitchell, G. & Marshall, S. (2009). Using the e-Learning Maturity Model to Benchmark Institutional Learning and Teaching Plans and Capabilities. Proceedings of the 2009 Educause in Australasia Conference, Perth, Australia, 3-6 May.
4. Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 41, 221-238.
5. Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 46-58. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/boyle.html
6. Bridgland, A. & Goodacre, C.F. (2005). Benchmarking in higher education: a framework for benchmarking for quality improvement purposes. Proceedings Educause Australasia 2005, 5-8 April 2005, Auckland New Zealand.
7. Camp, R.C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. Milwaukee, Wisconson, USA: ASQC Quality Press.
8. El Emam, K. Drouin, J-N. & Melo, W. (1998). SPICE: The theory and practice of software process improvement and capability determination. California: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Inglis, A. (2008). Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e-learning. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 347-362.
10. Marshall, S. (2005). Determination of New Zealand tertiary institution e-learning capability: An application of an e-learning maturity model. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. 132pp. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/documents/SectorReport.pdf
11. Marshall, S. (2006). New Zealand tertiary institution e-learning capability: Informing and guiding e-learning architectural change and development. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. 118pp. Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/
12. Marshall, S. (2006). Emm version two process guide. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
13. Marshall, S. (2008). What are the key factors that lead to effective adoption and support of e-learning by institutions? HERDSA 2008 Conference. Rotorua: HERDSA.
14. Marshall, S. (2009) ACODE Benchmarks - eMM version 2.3 Concordance. Report to the Australasian Council of Open and Distance Education. Wellington, NZ, Victoria University of Wellington.
15. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2002). An E-Learning Maturity Model? In Winds of change in the sea of learning: Proceedings ASCILITE Auckland 2002. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/173.pdf
16. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2003). Potential Indicators of e-Learning Process Capability, In Proceedings of EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2003 (Adelaide, May 6-9, 2003), EDUCAUSE. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/documents/1009anav.pdf
17. Marshall, S & Mitchell, G (2004). Applying SPICE to e-Learning: An E-Learning Maturity Model? In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Computing Education Conference (Dunedin, January, 2004). Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=979993&type=pdf&coll=
18. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2005). E-Learning Process Maturity in the New Zealand Tertiary Sector. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2005 Conference (Auckland, April 5-8, 2005). Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/documents/E-LearningProcessMaturity.pdf
19. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2006). Assessing sector e-learning capability with an e-learning maturity model. In Proceedings of the Association for Learning Technologies Conference, Edinburgh, UK.
20. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2007). Benchmarking International E-learning Capability with the E-Learning Maturity Model. In Proceedings of EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2007, 29 April - 2 May 2007, Melbourne. http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia07/authors_papers/Marshall-103.pdf
21. Marshall, S., Mitchell, G. & Beames, S. (2009). Report on the ACODE eMM Project. Report to the Australasian Council on Open and Distance Education. 88pp. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/acode/20090625ACODEReport.pdf
22. Marshall, S., Udas, K. & May, J. (2008). Assessing Online Learning Process Maturity: the e-Learning Maturity Model. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning, Orlando Florida, 6-7 November, 2008.
23. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4), 18-27.
24. SPICE (2005). Software process assessment version 1.00. Retrieved December 18, 2002, from http://www-sqi.cit.gu.edu/spice/