Towards a lightweight model driven method for developing SOA systems using existing assets

Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Web Systems Evolution, WSE

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 51-60

  Leotta, Maurizio ^a   Reggio, Gianna ^a   Ricca, Filippo ^a   Astesiano, Egidio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Model Driven; Precise Style; SOA; UML

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; DETAILED DESIGN; ERROR PRONE TASKS; INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS; MEET-IN-THE-MIDDLE; MODEL-DRIVEN; MODEL-DRIVEN METHOD; PRECISE STYLE; SOA; SOA-BASED SYSTEMS; UML; UML MODEL;

SYSTEM THEORY; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; WEBSITES;

LEGACY SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870843267     PISSN: 21606153     EISSN: 21606161     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSE.2012.6320532     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. E. Astesiano and G. Reggio. Tight Structuring for Precise UML-based Requirement Specifications. In M. Wirsing, A. Knapp, and S. Balsamo, editors, Radical Innovations of Software and Systems Engineering in the Future, Proceedings 9th Monterey Software Engineering Workshop, Venice, Italy, Sep. 2002., number 2941 in LNCS. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
2. P. Bauler, F. Feltz, E. Frogneux, B. Renwart, and C. Thomase. Usage of model driven engineering in the context of business process management. In Proceedings of Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, MKWI 2008, München, 26-28.2.2008,. GITO-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
3. C. Choppy and G. Reggio. A well-founded approach to service modelling with casl4soa: part 1 (service in isolation). In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '10, pages 2451-2458, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
4. F. Di Cerbo, G. Dodero, G. Reggio, F. Ricca, and G. Scanniello. Precise vs. Ultra-Light Activity Diagrams-An Experimental Assessment in the Context of Business Process Modelling. In D. Caivano, M. Oivo, M. Baldassarre, and G. Visaggio, editors, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2011), volume 6759 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 291-305. Springer Berlin /Heidelberg, 2011.
5. S. Dustdar, C. Dorn, F. Li, L. Baresi, G. Cabri, C. Pautasso, and F. Zambonelli. A Roadmap Towards Sustainable Selfaware Service Systems. In Proceedings of SEAMS 2010, pages 10-19, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
6. S. Inaganti and G. K. Behara. Service Identification: BPM and SOA Handshake. BPTrends, 2007.
7. S. Jones. Enterprise SOA Adoption Strategies: Using SOA to deliver IT to the Business. C4Media Publisher, 2006.
8. A. G. Kleppe, J. Warmer, and et al. MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, 2003. 5http://www.acceleo.org/
9. M. Leotta, G. Reggio, F. Ricca, and E. Astesiano. Building VECM-based Systems with a Model Driven Approach: an Experience Report. In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modeling (EESSMod 2011 co-located with MoDELS 2011), volume 785, pages 38-47. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2011.
10. M. Leotta, F. Ricca, G. Reggio, and E. Astesiano. Comparing the Maintainability of two Alternative Architectures of a Postal System: SOA vs. non-SOA. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2011), pages 317-320. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011.
11. A. Marchetto, C. D. Nguyen, C. Di Francescomarino, N. A. Qureshi, A. Perini, and P. Tonella. A Design Methodology for Real Services. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service-Oriented Systems (PESOS 2010), pages 15-21, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
12. R. C. Martin. Design principles and design patterns. 2000.
13. OMG. Business Process Model and Notation, v. 2.0. Standard, 2011.
14. OMG. Unified Modeling Language, Superstructure, v. 2.4. Specifications, 2011.
15. C. Ouyang, M. Dumas, S. Breutel, and A. ter Hofstede. Translating Standard Process Models to BPEL. In E. Dubois and K. Pohl, editors, Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006), volume 4001 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 417-432. Springer Berlin /Heidelberg, 2006.
16. D. Peixoto, V. Batista, A. Atayde, E. Borges, R. Resende, and C. Pádua. A Comparison of BPMN and UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams. In VII Simposio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software. Florianopolis, 2008.
17. G. Reggio, M. Leotta, and F. Ricca. "Precise is better than Light" A Document Analysis Study about Quality of Business Process Models. In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011 co-located with RE 2011), pages 61-68. IEEE Digital Library, 2011.
18. G. Reggio, M. Leotta, F. Ricca, and E. Astesiano. Choosing the right style for modelling the business process with the UML: Complete version. Technical Report DISI-TR-12-02, DISI-University of Genova, Italy, April 2012.
19. M. Rychly and P. Weiss. Modeling of service oriented architecture: From business process to service realisation. In Proceedings of 3rd International Working Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2008), pages 140-146. Institute for Systems and Technologies of Information, Control and Communication, 2008.
20. L. Sánchez-González, F. Ruiz, F. García, and J. Cardoso. Towards Thresholds of Control Flow Complexity Measures for BPMN Models. In Proceedings of SAC 2011, pages 1445-1450, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
21. H. M. Sneed. Migrating to Web services: A research framework. In Proceedings of Workshop on Service-Oriented Architecture Maintenance (SOAM 2007 co-located with CSMR 2007), 2007.