Comparing the maintainability of two alternative architectures of a postal system: SOA vs. non-SOA

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 317-320

  Leotta, Maurizio ^a   Ricca, Filippo ^a   Reggio, Gianna ^a   Astesiano, Egidio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Architecture analysis; Architectures comparison; Legacy postal system; Re engineering; SAAM; SOA

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS; LEGACY POSTAL SYSTEM; SAAM; SOA; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS METHODS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; LEGACY SYSTEMS; MAINTAINABILITY; REENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 79955163230     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.2011.41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. P. Clements, L. Bass, R. Kazman, and G. Abowd. Predicting software quality by architecture-level evaluation. In Proc. of International Conference on Software Quality, volume 5, pages 485-497. Software Engineering Institute, 1995.
2. T. Erl. SOA Principles of Service Design. Prentice Hall, 2007.
3. R. Kazman, G. Abowd, L. Bass, and P. Clements. Scenariobased analysis of software architecture. IEEE Softw., 13(6):47-55, 1996.
4. G. Reggio, E. Astesiano, F. Ricca, and M. Leotta. A problem frame-based approach to evolvability: the case of the multitranslation. In 16th Monterey Workshop, Microsoft Center, Redmond, US, 2010. (Submitted).