Assessing the publication productivity of clinical psychology professors in Canadian psychological association-accredited Canadian psychology departments

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 226-237

  Carleton, R Nicholas ^a   Parkerson, Holly A ^a   Horswill, Samantha C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian psychology research; CPA accredited psychology programs; H index; Psychology; Publications

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870812219     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027731     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Armenti, C. (2004). Gender as a barrier for women with children in Academe. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 34, 1-26. (Pubitemid 39187690)
2. Baker, D. B., & Benjamin, L. T. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist practitioner: A look back at boulder. American Psychologist, 55, 241-247.
3. Boatswain, S., Brown, N., Fiksenbaum, L., Goldstein, L., Greenglass, E., Nadler, E., & Pyke, S. W. (2001). Canadian feminist psychology: Where are we now? Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 42, 276-285.
4. Campanario, J. M. (1993). Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly-cited. Social Studies of Science, 23, 342-362. doi:10.1177/030631293023002005
5. Canadian Psychological Association. (2010). CPA Task Force on the Supply of Psychologists in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/docs/file/Task- Forces/CPA-SDTaskForceFinalReport-Oct2010.pdf/
6. Canadian Psychological Association. (2011). CPA accredited programs. Retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/education/accreditation/CPAaccreditedprograms/
7. Carleton, R. N., Peluso, D. L., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2010). Assessing the research activity of Canadian psychology departments with graduate programmes. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 51, 164-176. doi:10.1037/a0020193
8. Carleton, R. N., Peluso, D. L., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2011). Who measures those who measure? The future of assessing research activity in Canadian psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 52, 57-60. doi:10.1037/a0022466
9. Cramer, K. M., & Page, S. (2007). Calibrating Canadian universities: Rankings for sale once again. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22, 4-13. doi:10.1177/0829573507301040
10. Cyrenne, P., & Grant, H. (2009). University decision making and prestige: An empirical study. Economics of Education Review, 28, 237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.06.001
11. Feist, G. J. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 325-335. doi: 10.1207/sl5326934crj1004-4 (Pubitemid 127673549)
12. Feist, G. J. (2000). Distinguishing "good" science from "good enough" science [electronic version]. The Scientist, 14, 31.
13. Fothergill, A., & Feltey, K. (2003). "I've Worked Very Hard and Slept Very Little": Mothers on the tenure track in academia. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 5, 7-19.
14. Government of Canada. (2002). Knowledge matters: Skills and learning for Canadians. Canada's Innovative Strategy Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ PDFS/ED473598.pdf
15. Hack, T. F., Crooks, D., Plohman, J., & Kepron, E. (2010). Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: Identifying success indicators. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 2542-2549. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648. 2010.05429.X
16. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572. (Pubitemid 41688817)
17. Jacsó, P. (2006). Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs. Online Information Review, 30, 188-193. doi:10.1108/14684520610659201
18. Kreber, C, & Mhina, C. (2005). Just plain rhetoric? An analysis of mission statements of Canadian universities identifying their verbal commitments to facilitating and promoting lifelong learning. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 31, 51-86.
19. Luxton, M. (2007). Family responsibilities: The politics of love and care. In L. E. Lucas (Ed.), Unpacking Globalization: Markets, Gender, and Work (pp. 131-144). New York, NY: Lexington.
20. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319-383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5742-3-9
21. Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1997). Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 241-320). New York, NY: Agathon.
22. Matson, J. L., Malone, C. J., Gonzalez, M. L., McClure, D. R., Laud, R. B., & Minshawi, N. F. (2005). Clinical psychology Ph.D. programs rankings: Evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 503-513. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.003 (Pubitemid 41660385)
23. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings'of lis faculty: Web of science vs. Scopus and Google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105-2125. doi:10.1002/asi.20677 (Pubitemid 350229712)
24. Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 215-233. doi: 10.1017/S1537592708080572
25. Olos, L., & Hoff, E. H. (2006). Gender ratios in european psychology. European Psychologist, 11, 1-11. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.1.1 (Pubitemid 43392940)
26. Osborne, J. W. (Ed.). (2008). Best practices in quantitative methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
27. Ostertag, P. A., & Mcnamara, J. R. (1991). Feminization of psychology - the changing sex-ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 349-369. doi: 10.111 l/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00413.x
28. Page, S. (1998). Rankings of Canadian universities: Statistical contrivance versus help to students. Canadian Journal of Education, 23, 452-457. doi:10.2307/1585758
29. Page, S., & Cramer, K. M. (2003). An update on the use of ranks in calibrating and marketing higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 13, 87-101.
30. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn't women's work count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46-84. doi: 10.2307/2943903
31. Peluso, D. L., Carleton, R. N., Richter, A. A., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2011). The graduate advisory relationship in Canadian psychology programmes: Advisee perspectives. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 52, 29-40. doi:10.1037/a0022047
32. Probert, B. (2005). 'I just couldn't fit it in': Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 50-72. doi: 10.1111/J.1468-0432.2005.00262.X (Pubitemid 40171784)
33. Program details and eligibility. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/program-programme/nomination-mise-en- candidature-eng.aspx#selection
34. Schwartz, F. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65-77.
35. Service Canada: Psychologists Statistics. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/qc/job-futures/statistics/4151.shtml
36. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. (1995). Author judgments about the works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25, 477-498.
37. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius. A psychology of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Sonnert, G. (1995). What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. Social Studies of Science, 25, 35-55. doi:10.1177/030631295025001003
39. Symons, D. K. (2011). The h-index, graduate student applicants, and comparing rankings: A critique of Carleton et al. (2010). Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 52, 52-56. doi:10.1037/a0022050
40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
41. University of Alberta. (2000). University performance indicators. Edmonton, Canada: Author.
42. van Anders, S. M. (2004). Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 51, 511-521. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9
43. Wallace, J. E. (2008). Parenthood and productivity: A study of demands, resources and family-friendly firms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 110-122. doi:10.10167j.jvb.2007.11.002
44. Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449, 403. doi:10.1038/449403b (Pubitemid 47509530)