SEISMOCARE: An efficient GIS tool for scenario-type investigations of seismic risk of existing cities

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 73-84

  Anagnostopoulos, Stavros ^a   Providakis, Costas ^b   Salvaneschi, Paolo ^c   Athanasopoulos, George ^a   Bonacina, Giuseppe ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

^d ISMES Istituto Sperimentale Modelli e Strutture   (Italy)

Author keywords

Building inventory; Earthquake loss estimation; Earthquake scenario; GIS; Local soil effects; Seismic hazard analysis; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; ESTIMATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION; EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO; SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;

SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GIS; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 35848929884     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bendimerad F. Loss estimation: a powerful tool for risk assessment and mitigation. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 21 (2001) 467-472
2. McCormack T., and Rad F. An earthquake loss estimation methodology for buildings based on ATC-13 and ATC-21. Earthquake Spectra 13 4 (1977) 605-621
3. Barbat A.H., Moya F.Y., and Canas J.A. Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones. Earthquake Spectra 12 3 (1996) 371-394
4. Jimenez M.J., Garcia-Fernandez M., Zonno M., and Cella F. Soil response analysis in Barcelona, Spain. Part II: Analytical evaluation versus empirical estimates. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 19 (2000) 289-301
5. Fah D., Ruttener E., Noack T., and Kruspan P. Microzonation of the city of Basel. J Seismol 1 (1997) 87-102
6. Noack T., Kruspan T., Fah D., and Ruttener E. Seismic microzonation of the city of Basel (Switzerland) based on geological and geotechnical data and numerical simulations. Eclogea Geol Helv 90 (1997) 433-448
7. Fah D., Kind F., Lang K., and Giardini D. Earthquake scenarios for the city of Bassel. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 21 (2001) 405-413
8. UPES. Microzonation sismica de Santa Fe de Bogota. Convenio Interadministrativo 01-93. Ingeominas e Universidad de los Andes, 1997.
9. Faccioli E, Guest editor. The Catania project: studies for an earthquake damage scenario. J Seismol 1999;3(3) [special issue].
10. Erdik M. Developing a comprehensive earthquake disaster master plan for Istanbul. In: Tucker B. (Ed). Issues in urban earthquake risk (1993), Klwver Academic, The Netherlands 125-166
11. Esteva L. An overview of seismic hazard, seismic risk and earthquake engineering in Mexico City. In: Proceedings of the first international earthquake and megacities workshop, 1-4 September 1997. p. 385-92
12. Bard P-Y, Bour M, Duvai AM, Codefroy P, Martin Ch, Meneroud JP, et al. Seismic zonation methodology for the City of Nice. Progress report. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on seismic zonation, Nice, France, 1995. p. 1749-84.
13. Fernandez J, Valverde H, Yepes H, Tucker P, Bustamente G, Chatelain J-L, et al. The Quito, Ecuador, earthquake risk management project: an overview. Palo Alto, CA: Geohazards International; 1994.
14. Borcherdt RD. Spatial ground motion amplification analyses. In: Proceedings of the Geoinstitute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1997.
15. McGuire RK. Seismic hazard and risk analysis. ESRI, 2004.
16. Gutenberg B., and Richter C.F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Dyn Earthquake Eng 21 (1994) 405-413
17. Fassoulas Ch, Margaris B, Papaioannou Ch, Papazachos B, Papazachos C, Theodoulidis N. Seismic hazard assessment and seismic scenarios for the City of Chania-Crete. Technical report. SEISMOCARE Project, ITSAK, Thessaloniki, 1999.
18. Papazachos B.C. Seismicity of the Aegean and surrounding area. Tectonophysics 178 (1996) 287-301
19. Theodoulidis N, Papazachos B. Strong motion for intermediate depth subduction earthquakes and its comparison with that of shallow earthquakes in Greece. In: Proceedings of the XXII general association of ESC II, 1990. p. 857-64.
20. Theodoulidis N., and Papazachos B. Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece. II: Horizontal pseudovelocities. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 13 (1994) 317-343
21. Athanasopoulos G, Pelekis, P. Site effects on the seismic ground response of the City of Chania. Technical report. SEISMOCARE Project, University of Patras, 2000.
22. GNDT-CERN. Istruzioni per la compilazione della scheda di rilevamento esposizione e vulnerabilita sismica degli Edifici, 1986.
23. Gavarini C, Nistico N. Buildings vulnerability and damage models. Technical report. SEISMOCARE Project, University of Roma, Rome, 2000.
24. Woo G, Paget B. Loss estimations for the City of Chania. Technical report. SEISMOCARE Project, EQE International, London, 2000.
25. Anagnostopoulos SA, Whitman RS. On human loss prediction in buildings during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 6th world conference in earthquake engineering, New Delhi, 1977. p. 2-323.