The effects of social network ties on the public's satisfaction with forest management in British Columbia, canada

Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 147-179

  Taylor, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870762952     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894985.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Beckley, T., J. Parkins and R. Stedman (2002). Indicators of forest-dependent community sustainability: The evolution of research. Forestry Chronicle, 78(5), 626-636.
2. Blackshaw, T. and J. Long (1998). A critical examination of the advantages of investigating community and leisure from a social network perspective. Leisure Studies, 17(4), 233-248.
3. Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53,181-190.
4. Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92,1287-1335.
5. Canadian Standards Association (2002). CAN/CSA-Z809-02. Sustainable Forest Management: Requirements and Guidance. A National Standard of Canada (approved May 2003), 2nd Edition. Mississauga, ON: Canadian Standards Association.
6. Carroll, W. K. (2004). Corporate Power in a Globalizing World: A Study in Elite Social Organization. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
7. Cashore, B., G. Hoberg, M. Howlett, J. Rayner and J. Wilson. (2001). In Search of Sustainability: British Columbia Forest Policy in the 1990s. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
8. Coleman, J. S., E. Katz and H. Menzel (1966). Medical Innovation. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
9. Cormier, J.J. andD. B. Tindall (2005). Wood frames: Framing the forests in British Columbia. Sociological Focus, 38(1), 1-24.
10. Cormier, J., D. B. Tindall and M. Diani. (2007). Network social capital as an out-come of social movement mobilization. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York.
11. Diani, M. (1995). Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12. Diani, M. (1997). Social movements and social capital. Mobilization, 2,129-147.
13. Diani, M. and D. McAdam (Eds.) (2003). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd Edition. Toronto, ON: John Wiley and Sons.
15. Erickson, B.H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-121.
16. Erickson, B.H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217-252.
17. Forest Stewardship Council Canada Working Group (2004). National Boreal Standard. Toronto, ON: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Canada Working Group.
18. Frame, T. M., T. Gunton and J. C. Day (2004). The role of collaboration in environmental management: An evaluation of land and resource planning in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(1), 59-82.
19. Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Gartrell, C. D. (1987). Network approaches to social evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 49-66.
21. Halseth, G. and A. Booth (2003). What works well; what needs improvement: Lessons in public consultation from British Columbia's resource planning processes. Local Environment, 8(4), 437-455.
22. Harshaw, H. W. (2008a). Outdoor recreation participation in BC forest-dependent communities. Forest Chronicle, 84(2), 210-220.
23. Harshaw, H. W. (2008b). British Columbia Sustainable Forest Management Public Opinion Survey 2006/2007: Synthesis of Results from Nine Communities. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning.
24. Harshaw, H.W., S. R.J. Sheppard and P. Jeakins (2009). Public attitudes toward sustainable forest management: Opinions from forest-dependent communities in British Columbia. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 10(2), 81-103.
25. Harshaw, H. W. and D. B. Tindall (2005). Social structure, identities, and values: A network approach to understanding people's relationships to forests. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 426-449.
26. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
27. Hemingway, J. L. (1999). Leisure, social capital, and democratic citizenship. Journal ofLeisure Research, 31(2), 150-165.
28. Horne, P., P. C. Boxall and W. L. Adamowicz (2005). Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: A spatially explicit choice experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1-2), 189-199.
29. Hubacek, K., C. Prell, M. Reed et al. (2006). Using stakeholder and social network analysis to support participatory processes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 2, 249-252.
30. Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Klenk, N. L., G. M. Hickey, J. I. MacLellan, R. Gonzales andJ. Cardille (2009). Social network analysis: A useful tool for visualizing and evaluating forestry research. International Forestry Review, 11(1), 134-140.
32. Knoke, D. (1990). Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lin, N., Y.-C. Fu and R.-M. Hsung (2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook and R. R. Burt (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 57-81.
34. Manning, R. E. (1999). Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction, 2nd Edition. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
35. Mische, A. (2008). Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Needham, M. D. and R. Rollins (2009). Social science, conservation, and protected areas theory. In P. Dearden and R. Rollins (Eds.), Parks and Protected Areas in Canada: Planning and Management, 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 135-167.
37. Opp, K. (1986). Soft incentives and collective action: Participation in the anti-nuclear movement. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 87-112.
38. Prell, C., K. Hubacek and M. Reed (2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 501-518.
39. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28, 664-683.
41. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York, NY: Free Press.
42. Salant, P. andD. A. Dillman (1994). How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
43. Sargent-Michaud, J. and K. J. Boyle (2002). Public perceptions of wildlife manage-ment in Maine. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7,163-178.
44. Shaw, K. (2002). Encountering Clayoquot. In W. Magnusson and K. Shaw (Eds.), A Political Space: Reading the Global through Clayoquot Sound. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 25-66.
45. Sheppard, S. R. J., M. J. Meitner, H. W. Harshaw, N. Wilson and C. Pearce (2006). Extension Note 3-Public processes in sustainable forest management for the Arrow Forest District. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 7(1), 57-67.
46. Stokowski, P.A. (1990). Extending the social groups model: Social network analysis in recreation research. Leisure Sciences, 12, 251-263.
47. Stokowski, P.A. and R.G. Lee (1991). The influence of social network ties on recreation and leisure: An exploratory study. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 95-113.
48. Suls, J. and R. Miller (1977). Social Comparison Processes. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
49. Tindall, D. B. (2001). Social science and forestry curricula: Some survey results. Forestry Chronicle, 77, 121-126.
50. Tindall, D. B. (2002). Social networks, identification, and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia wilderness preservation movement. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 39, 413-452.
51. Tindall, D. B. (2004). Social movement participation over time: An ego-network approach to micro-mobilization. Sociological Focus, 37,163-184.
52. Tindall, D. B. and N. Begoray (1993). Old growth defenders: The battle for the Carmanah Valley. In S. Lerner (Ed.), Environmental Stewardship: Studies in Active Earthkeeping. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Geography Series, pp. 269-322.
53. Tindall, D. B., J. L. Robinson and M. Diani (2010). The concept of social movement revisited: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the Sunbelt Social Network Conference in Riva del Garda, Italy, July 3.
54. Valente, T. W. (1995). Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
55. Vining, J. and E. Tyler (1999). Values, emotions and desired outcomes reflected in public responses to forest management plans. Human Ecology Review, 6,21-34.
56. Wellman, B. (1979). The community question. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1201-1231.
57. Whisman, S. and S. Hollenhorst (1998). A path model of whitewater boating satisfaction on the Cheat River of West Virginia. Environmental Management, 22(1), 109-117.
58. Williams, P. W., R. W. Penrose and S. Hawkes (1998). Shared decision-making in tourism land use planning. Annals of Tourism Research, 25, 860-889.
59. Wilson, J. (1998). Talk and Log: Wilderness Politics in British Columbia, 1965-96. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.