Academic involvement with the LMS: An exploratory study

ASCILITE 2010 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 487-496

  Clark, Ken ^a   Beer, Colin ^a   Jones, David ^b  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CQUniversity ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Academic analytics; Engagement; LMS; LMS features; Staff interaction

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ANALYTICS; ENGAGEMENT; LMS; LMS FEATURES; STAFF INTERACTION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84870737288     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ainley, M. (2004). What do we know about student motivation and engagement? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, November 29-December 2, 2004. http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/ain04760.pdf
2. Beer, C., Jones, D. & Clark, K. (2009). The indicators project identifying effective learning: Adoption, activity, grades and external factors. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/beer.pdf.
3. Chen, P.-S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance [Electronic Version]. Journal of online education, 4. http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol4_issue3/Learning_at_a_Distance-__Engaged_or_Not_.pdf
4. Dawson, S. & McWilliam, E. (2008). Investigating the application of IT generated data as an indicator of learning and teaching performance. A report produced for the Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://olt.ubc.ca/learning_tools/research_1/research/
5. Dyson, M. & Campello, S. (2003). Evaluating Virtual Learning Environments: what are we measuring? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1(1): 11-20.
6. Fresen, J. (2007). A taxonomy of factors to promote quality web-supported learning. International Journal on E-Learning 6(3): 351-362.
7. Hollander, E., Saltmarsh, J. & Zlotkowski, E. (2002). Indicators of Engagement, Campus Compact. In M. Kennedy, Lou Simon, K. Kiley-Brabeck, Richard Learner (eds) Promoting Civil Society Through Service Learning. Massachusetts: Kluwer. pp. 31-50.
8. Heathcote, E. & Dawson, S. (2005). Data Mining for Evaluation, Benchmarking, and Reflective Practice in a LMS. In Proceedings E-Learn 2005: World conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare & higher education. Vancouver, Canada.
9. Kearsley, G. & Schneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement Theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Naval Seas System Command, http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
10. Kember, D, & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5): 469-490.
11. Krause, Kerri-Lee. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/Stud_eng.pdf
12. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change 35(2): 24-32.
13. Lave, J. & Wënger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, cited in Dyson, M. and Campello, S. (2003). Evaluating Virtual Learning Environments: what are we measuring? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1(1): 11-20
14. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Radloff, A. (2008) Engaging staff in quality learning and teaching: What's a Pro Vice Chancellor to do? In Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference, Rotorua, 1-4 July 2008: pp 285-296.
16. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3): 299-355.