Blended reality: Issues and potentials in combining virtual worlds and face-to-face classes

ASCILITE 2010 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 129-140

  Bower, Matt ^a   Cram, Andrew ^a   Groom, Dean ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Augmented virtuality; Blended reality; Learning and teaching spaces; Learning design; Mixed reality; Pedagogy; Technology; Virtual worlds

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED VIRTUALITY; BLENDED REALITY; LEARNING AND TEACHING SPACES; LEARNING DESIGNS; MIXED REALITY; PEDAGOGY; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS; AUGMENTED REALITY; BLENDING; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84870726389     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds. Science, 317(5837), 472-476.
2. Castronova, E. (2005). Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
4. Greenhow, C., & Belbas, B. (2007). Using activity-oriented design methods to study collaborative knowledge-building in e-learning courses within higher education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 363-391.
5. Hayes, G. (2008). The Dawn of Mixed Reality and it's Participatory Audience http://www.personalizemedia.com/the-dawn-of-mixed-reality-and-its-participatory-audience/
6. Hoshi, K., Pesola, U.-M., Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. (2009). Tools, Perspectives and Avatars in Blended Reality Space. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 144, 91-95.
7. Huynh, D. F., Xu, Y., & Wang, S. (2006). Exploring user experience in blended reality: moving interactions out of the screen. In CHI, Montréal, Canada, (pp. 893-898): ACM.
8. Institute for the Future (2009). Blended Reality: Superstructing Reality, Superstructing Selves http://www.iftf.org/node/2598
9. Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(2), 317-329.
10. Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual World Teaching, Experiential Learning, and Assessment: An Interdisciplinary Communication Course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(1), 169-182.
11. Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 61-79.
12. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, (pp. 282-292): SPIE.
13. Moore, A. (2010). It's not online or offline, it's blended reality Retrieved 5 July, 2010
14. Regenbrecht, H., Lum, T., Kohler, P., Ott, C., Wagner, M., Wilke, W., et al. (2004). Using augmented virtuality for remote collaboration. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments archive, 13(3), 338-354.
15. Smarr, L., & Gruber, H. E. (2008). Excursions into blended reality http://www.slideshare.net/Calit2LS/excursions-into-blended-reality
16. Swan, M. (2007). Virtual Worlds and Blended Reality http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/people-blog/2007/virtual-worlds-and-blended-reality/
17. Total Immersion (2004). D'Fusion Technology R http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3857855347623051125#
18. Wood, T. (2008). Blended Reality: A look at bringing Second Life into Real Life http://on10.net/blogs/tina/Blended-Reality-A-look-at-bringing-Second-Life-into-Real-Life/