An objective and automated method for assessing surgical skill in endoscopic sinus surgery using eye-tracking and tool-motion data

International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 507-515

  Ahmidi, Narges ^a,c   Ishii, Masaru ^b   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a,c   Gallia, Gary L ^d   Hager, Gregory D ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cadaver experiment; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Eye tracking; Objective skill assessment; Surgical skill evaluation; Tool tracking

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DATA ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKILL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGEON; SURGICAL SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ALGORITHMS; CADAVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ENDOSCOPY; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PARANASAL SINUSES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84870716469     PISSN: 20426976     EISSN: 20426984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21053     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD. A review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:356-366.
2. DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2005 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2007;(385):1-19.
3. Zhan C, Miller M. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290:1868-1874.
4. Barden CB, Specht MC, McCarter MD, Daly JM, Fahey TJ. Effects of limited work hours on surgical training. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:244-245.
5. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. Br Med Assoc. 2003;327:1032-1037.
6. Kennedy DW. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111:643-649.
7. Padoy N, Mateus D, Weinland D, Berger MO, Navab N. Workflow monitoring based on 3D motion features. ICCV Workshop on Video-oriented Object and Event Classification, Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
8. Lin HC, Shafran I, Yuh D, Hager GD. Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11:220-230.
9. Reiley C, Hager GD. Task versus subtask surgical skill evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgery. In: Yang GZ, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, Noble A, Taylor C, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5761. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009:435-442.
10. Varadarajan B, Reiley C, Lin HC, Khudanpur S, Hager GD. Data-derived models for segmentation with application to surgical assessment and training. In: Yang GZ, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, Noble A, Taylor C, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5761. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009:426-434.
11. Richstone L, Schwartz MJ, Seideman C, Cadeddu J, Marshall S, Kavoussi LR. Eye metric as an objective assessment of surgical skill. Ann Surg. 2010;252:177-182.
12. Munz Y, Almoudaris A, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle A, Darzi A. Curriculum based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg. 2007;193:774-783.
13. Ahmidi N, U-Thainual P, Vikal S, Mousavi P, Iordachita I, Fichtinger G. A System for Performance Analysis of Surgeon Dexterity in Percutaneous Needle-based Interventions. Toronto, ON: Imaging Network Ontario, University of Toronto; 2008.
14. Ahmidi N, Hager GD, Ishii L, Fichtinger G, Gallia GL, Ishii M. Surgical task and skill classification from eye tracking and tool motion in minimally invasive surgery. In: Jiang T, Navab N, Pluim J, Viergever M, ed. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6363. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2010:295-302.
15. Leong JJ, Nicolaou M, Atallah L, Mylonas GP, Darzi AW, Yang GZ. HMM assessment of quality of movement trajectory in laparoscopic surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12:335-346.
16. Rosen J, Brown JD, Chang L, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete HMM model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:399-413.
17. Grinstead CM, Snell JL, Introduction to Probability. 2nd rev ed. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 1997.
18. Hartigan JA. Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley; 1975.
19. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65-70.
20. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.