Sister chromatids segregate at mitosis without mother-daughter bias in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics

Volumn 192, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1553-1557

  Keyes, Brice E ^a   Sykes, Kenneth D ^b,c   Remington, Courtney E ^b   Burke, Daniel J ^b  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA STRAND; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID;

CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; MITOSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84870681017     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.145680     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Armakolas, A., and A. J. Klar, 2006. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 311: 1146-1149
2. Armakolas, A., and A. J. Klar, 2007. Left-right dynein motor implicated in selective chromatid segregation in mouse cells. Science 315: 100-101
3. Armakolas, A., M. Koutsilieris, and A. J. Klar, 2010. Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22: 81-87
4. Booth, C., G. Brady, and C. S. Potten, 2002. Crowd control in the crypt. Nat. Med. 8: 1360-1361
5. Cairns, J., 1975. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255: 197-200
6. Chua, P., and S. Jinks-Robertson, 1991. Segregation of recombinant chromatids following mitotic crossing over in yeast. Genetics 129: 359-369
7. Conboy, M. J., A. O. Karasov, and T. A. Rando, 2007. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 5: e102
8. Escobar, M., P. Nicolas, F. Sangar, S. Laurent-Chabalier, P. Clair et al., 2011. Intestinal epithelial stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetric chromosome segregation. Nat. Commun. 2: 258
9. Falconer, E., E. A. Chavez, A. Henderson, S. S. Poon, S. McKinney et al., 2010. Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences. Nature 463: 93-97
10. Fei, J. F., and W. B. Huttner, 2009. Nonselective sister chromatid segregation in mouse embryonic neocortical precursor cells. Cereb. Cortex 19(Suppl. 1): i49-i54
11. Karpowicz, P., C. Morshead, A. Kam, E. Jervis, J. Ramunas et al., 2005. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 170: 721-732
12. Klar, A. J., 1987. Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast. Nature 326: 466-470
13. Klar, A. J., 2007. Lessons learned from studies of fission yeast mating-type switching and silencing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41: 213-236
14. Lansdorp, P. M., 2007. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell 129: 1244-1247
15. Merok, J. R., J. A. Lansita, J. R. Tunstead, and J. L. Sherley, 2002. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics. Cancer Res. 62: 6791-6795
16. Neff, M. W., and D. J. Burke, 1991. Random segregation of chromatids at mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 127: 463-473
17. Park, P. U., M. McVey, and L. Guarente, 2002. Separation of mother and daughter cells. Methods Enzymol. 351: 468-477
18. Potten, C. S., G. Owen, and D. Booth, 2002. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J. Cell Sci. 115: 2381-2388
19. Rando, T. A., 2007. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell 129: 1239-1243
20. Schepers, A. G., R. Vries, M. van den Born, M. van de Wetering, and H. Clevers, 2011. Lgr5 intestinal stem cells have high telomerase activity and randomly segregate their chromosomes. EMBO J. 30: 1104-1109
21. Tajbakhsh, S., 2008. Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20: 716-722
22. Thorpe, P. H., J. Bruno, and R. Rothstein, 2009. Kinetochore asymmetry defines a single yeast lineage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 6673-6678
23. Viggiani, C. J., and O. M. Aparicio, 2006. New vectors for simplified construction of BrdU-incorporating strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 23: 1045-1051
24. Walters, K., 2009. Colonic stem cell data are consistent with the immortal model of stem cell division under non-random strand segregation. Cell Prolif. 42: 339-347
25. Yadlapalli, S., J. Cheng, and Y. M. Yamashita, 2011. Drosophila male germline stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands. J. Cell Sci. 124: 933-939
26. Yamada-Inagawa, T., A. J. Klar, and J. Z. Dalgaard, 2007. Schizosaccharomyces pombe switches mating type by the synthesis-dependent strand-annealing mechanism. Genetics 177: 255-265