Carotid resistive index in treated hypertensive patients: Relationship with target organ damage

Blood Pressure

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 360-366

  Morillas, Pedro ^a   Quiles, Juan ^a   Mateo, Irene ^a   Bertomeu González, Vicente ^a   Castillo, Jesus ^a   De Andrade, Helder ^a   Roldán, Julián ^a   Miralles, Beatriz ^a   Masiá, María Dolores ^a   Carrillo, Pilar ^a   Bertomeu Martínez, Vicente ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE SAN JUAN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ankle brachial index; Carotid wall thickness; Left ventricular mass; Microalbuminuria; Target organ damage

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; AGE; ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY; ARTERIAL WALL THICKNESS; ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID RESISTIVE INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; URINARY EXCRETION;

ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VASCULAR STIFFNESS;

EID: 84870677068     PISSN: 08037051     EISSN: 16511999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08037051.2012.694181     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Burnier M, Caulfield MJ, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: A European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens.2009;27: 2121-2158.
2. Tokmakç i M, Erdoǧan N. Investigation of the arterial stiffness on renal artery Doppler sonograms. J Med Syst. 2009;33: 101-106.
3. Pourcelot L. Applications cliniques de l 'e xamen Doppler transcutan. In: Peronneau P, ed. Velocimetrie ultrasonore Doppler. Paris: INSERM; 1975. p. 213-240.
4. Pontremoli R, Viazzi F, Martinoli C, Ravera M, Nicolella C, Berruti V, et al. Increased renal resistive index in patients with essential hypertension: A marker of target organ damage. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14: 360-365.
5. Florczak E, Januszewicz M, Januszewicz A, Prejbisz A, Kaczmarska M, Michałowska I, et al. Relationship between renal resistive index and early target organ damage in patients with nevertreated essential hypertension. Blood Press. 2009;18: 55-61.
6. Raff U, Schmidt BM, Schwab J, Schwarz TK, Achenbach S, Bä r I, et al. Renal resistive index in addition to low-grade albuminuria complements screening for target organ damage in therapyresistant hypertension. J Hypertens. 2010;28: 608-614.
7. Tedesco MA, Natale F, Mocerino R, Tassinario G, Calabrò R. Renal resistive index and cardiovascular organ damage in a large population of hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21: 291-296.
8. Frauchiger B, Schmid HP, Roedel C, Moosmann P, Staub D. Comparison of carotid arterial resistive indices with intimamedia thickness as sonographic markers of atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2001;32: 836-841.
9. Nakatou T, Nakata K, Nakamura A, Itoshima T. Carotid hemodynamic parameters as risk factors for cerebral infarction in Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2004;21 223-229.
10. Farhoudi M, Mehrvar K, Aslanabadi N, Ghabili N, Baghmishe NR, Ilkhchoei F. Doppler study of cerebral arteries in hypercholesterolemia. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7: 203-207.
11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography ' s guidelines and standard committee and the camber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18: 1440-1463.
12. Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML, Baumgartner I, Cl é ment D, Collet JP, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011; doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr211.
13. Ishimura E, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Okuno Y, Kogawa K, Fukumoto S, et al. Intrarenal hemodynamic abnormalities in diabetic nephropathy measured by duplex Doppler sonography. Kidney Int. 1997;51: 1920-1927.
14. Frauchiger B, Nussbaumer P, Hugentobler M, Staub D. Duplex sonographic registration of age and diabetes-related loss of renal vasodilatory response to nitroglycerine. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15: 827-832.
15. Barutcu I, Esen AM, Degirmenci B, Acar M, Kaya D, Turkmen M, et al. Acute cigarette smoking-induced hemodynamic alterations in the common carotid artery - A transcranial Doppler study. Circ J. 2004;68: 1127-1131.
16. McArthur C, Geddes CC, Baxter GM Early measurement of pulsatility and resistive indexes: Correlation with long-term renal transplant function. Radiology. 2011;259: 278-285.
17. Krumme B. Renal Doppler sonography - update in clinical nephrology. Nephron Clin Pract. 2006;103: c24 - c28.
18. Liu KH, Chu WW, Kong AP, Kong WL, So WY, Tong PC, et al. Associations of intra-renal arterial resistance index with chronic kidney disease and carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92: e37 - e40.
19. Kawai T, Kamide K, Onishi M, Yamamoto-Hanasaki H, Baba Y, Hongyo K, et al. Usefulness of the resistive index in renal Doppler ultrasonography as an indicator of vascular damage in patients with risks of atherosclerosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26: 3256-3262.
20. Petersen LJ, Petersen JR, Ladefoged SD, Mehlsen J, Jensen HA. The pulsatility index and the resistive index in renal arteries in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10: 2060e4.
21. Okura T, Watanabe S, Miyoshi K, Fukuoka T, Higaki J. Intrarenal and carotid hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17: 240-244.
22. Sezer S, Karakan S, Ço lak T, Haberal M. Nocturnal nondipping hypertension is related to dyslipidemia and increased renal resistivity index in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2011;43: 530-532.
23. Aasli R. Cerebral hemodynamics, in transcranial Doppler. Newel DW, Aaslid R, eds. New York: Raven Press Ltd; 1992. p. 49-55.
24. Bai CH, Chen JR, Chiu HC, Pan WH. Lower blood flow velocity, higher resistance index, and larger diameter of extracranial carotid arteries are associated with ischemic stroke independently of carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35: 322-330.
25. Chuang SY, Bai CH, Chen JR, Yeh WT, Chen HJ, Chiu HC, et al. Common carotid end-diastolic velocity and intimamedia thickness jointly predict ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke. 2011;42: 1338-1344.
26. Lee MY, Wu CM, Chu CS, Lee KT, Sheu SH, Lai WT. Association of carotid hemodynamics with risk of coronary heart disease in a Taiwanese population with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21: 696-700.
27. Manabe S, Okura T, Watanabe S, Higaki J. Association between carotid haemodynamics and inflammation in patients with essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19: 787-791.
28. Staub D, Meyerhans A, Bundi B, Schmid HP, Frauchiger B. Prediction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: Comparison of the internal carotid artery resistive index with the common carotid artery intima-media thickness. Stroke. 2006;37: 800-805.
29. Uthoff H, Staub D, Meyerhans A, Hochuli M, Bundi B, Schmid HP, et al. Intima-media thickness and carotid resistive index: Progression over 6 years and predictive value for cardiovascular events. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29: 604-610.