Investigating metaphorical language in sentiment analysis: A sense-to-sentiment perspective

ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Rentoumi, Vassiliki ^a,b   Vouros, George A ^c   Karkaletsis, Vangelis ^a   Moser, Amalia ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Figurative language; Metaphorical expressions; Sentiment analysis; Sentiment classification of sentences; Sentiment classification of word senses; Word Sense Disambiguation

Indexed keywords

FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE; METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIONS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; WORD SENSE; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84870675926     PISSN: 15504875     EISSN: 15504883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2382434.2382436     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ANDREEVSKAIA, A. AND BERGLER, S. 2007. Clac and clac-nb: Knowledge-based and corpus-based approaches to sentiment tagging. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval). 119-120.
2. ANDREEVSKAIA, A. AND BERGLER, S. 2008. When specialists and generalists work together: Overcoming domain dependence in sentiment tagging. In Proceedings of ACL HLT. 290-298.
3. ATTARDI, G. AND SIMI, M. 2007. Blog mining through opinionated words. In Proceedings of the 15th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC).
4. BALAHUR, A., STEINBERGER, R., KABADJOV, M., ZAVARELLA, V., VAN der GOOT, E., HALKIA, M., POULIQUEN, B., AND BELYAEVA, J. 2010. Sentiment analysis in the news. In Proceedings of LREC. Vol. 10.
5. CHOI, Y., BRECK, E., AND CARDIE, C. 2006. Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 431-439.
6. CLORE, G. AND ORTONY, A. 1988. The semantics of the affective lexicon. In Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation. V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, and N. H. Frijda Eds., 367-397.
7. CLORE, G., ORTONY, A., AND FOSS, M. 1987. The psychological foundations of the affective lexicon. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 53, 4, 751-766.
8. ESULI, A. AND SEBASTIANI, F. 2006. Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of LREC. Vol. 6. 417-422.
9. FAINSILBER, L. AND ORTONY, A. 1987. Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor Symbol 2, 4, 239-250.
10. FAUCONNIER, G. AND TURNER, M. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. R. Gibbs Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 53-66.
11. GENTNER, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cog. Sci. 7, 2, 155-170.
12. GIANNAKOPOULOS, G., KARKALETSIS, V., VOUROS, G., AND STAMATOPOULOS, P. 2008. Summarization system evaluation revisited: N-gram graphs. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 5, 3.
13. GIANNAKOPOULOS, G., VOUROS, G., AND KARKALETSIS, V. 2010. Mudos-ng: Multi-document summaries using n-gram graphs. Tech. rep. CoRR abs/1012.2042.
14. GIBBS, R. AND GERRIG, R. 1989. How context makes metaphor comprehension seem special'. Metaphor Symbol 4, 3, 145-158.
15. GIL-GARĆIA, R., BAD́IA-CONTELLES, J., AND PONS-PORRATA, A. 2003. Extended star clustering algorithm. In Progress in Pattern Recognition, Speech and Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Compuer Science, Vol. 2905, 480-487. (Pubitemid 137629435)
16. GROUP, P. 2007. Mip: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor Symbol 22, 1, 1-39.
17. GUNAWARDANA, A., MAHAJAN, M., ACERO, A., AND PLATT, J. 2005. Hidden conditional random fields for phone classification. In Proceedings of 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.
18. HU, M. AND LIU, B. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 168-177. (Pubitemid 40114926)
19. IKEDA, D., TAKAMURA, H., RATINOV, L., AND OKUMURA, M. 2008. Learning to shift the polarity of words for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP).
20. JACOBSON, R. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language. T. A. Sebeok Ed., Wiley, NY.
21. KIM, S. AND HOVY, E. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of COLING 4, 1367-1373.
22. LAFFERTY, J., MCCALLUM, A., AND PEREIRA, F. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Machine Learning International Workshop. 282-289.
23. LAKOFF, G. AND JOHNSON, M. 2001. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
24. LEACOCK, C., MILLER, G., AND CHODOROW, M. 1998. Using corpus statistics and Wordnet relations for sense identification. Comput. Ling. 24, 1, 147-165.
25. MAO, Y. AND LEBANON, G. 2007. Isotonic conditional random fields and local sentiment flow. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 19, 961.
26. MART́IN-WANTON, T., PONS-PORRATA, A., MONTOYO-GUIJARRO, A., AND BALAHUR, A. 2009. Opinion Polarity Detection.
27. MART́IN-WANTON, T., BALAHUR-DOBRESCU, A., MONTOYO-GUIJARRO, A., AND PONS-PORRATA, A. 2010. Word sense disambiguation in opinion mining: Pros and cons. Natural Lang. Process. Appl. (Special issue), 119.
28. MCDONALD, R., HANNAN, K., NEYLON, T., WELLS, M., AND REYNAR, J. 2007. Structured models for fineto-coarse sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Association For Computational Linguistics. Vol. 45, 432.
29. MOTSIOU, V. 1994. Stoicheia Lexikologias: Eisagoge Ste Neoellenike Lexikologia. Ekdoseis Nephele.
30. MÜ LLER, C. 2008. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. University of Chicago Press.
31. PALMER, M., DANG, H., AND FELLBAUM, C. 2007. Making fine-grained and coarse-grained sense distinctions, both manually and automatically. Natural Lang. Eng. 13, 2, 137-163. (Pubitemid 47090609)
32. PANG, B. AND LEE, L. 2005. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 115-124.
33. PEDERSEN, T. AND KOLHATKAR, V. 2009. WordNet:: Sense Relate:: All Words: A broad coverage word sense tagger that maximizes semantic relatedness. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Companion Volume: Demonstration Session). 17-20.
34. PEDERSEN, T., BANERJEE, S., AND PATWARDHAN, S. 2005. Maximizing semantic relatedness to perform word sense disambiguation. Rep. UMSI 25, Supercomputing Institute Research.
35. POLANYI, L. AND ZAENEN, A. 2004. Contextual valence shifters. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, 1-9.
36. QUATTONI, A., COLLINS, M., AND DARRELL, T. 2004. Conditional random fields for object recognition. In Proceedings of NIPS.
37. RENTOUMI, V., KARKALETSIS, V., VOUROS, G., AND MOZER, A. 2008. Sentiment analysis exploring metaphorical and idiomatic senses: A word sense disambiguation approach. In Proccedings of the International Workshop on Computational Aspects of Affectual and Emotional Interaction (CAFFEi).
38. RENTOUMI, V., GIANNAKOPOULOS, G., KARKALETSIS, V., AND VOUROS, G. 2009. Sentiment analysis of figurative language using a word sense disambiguation approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP). The Association for Computational Linguistics.
39. RILOFF, E. AND WIEBE, J. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 105-112.
40. RUMBELL, T., BARNDEN, J., LEE, M., AND WALLINGTON, A. 2008. Affect in metaphor: Developments with WordNet. In Proceedings of the AISB Convention on Communication, Interaction and Social Intelligence. Vol. 1, 21.
41. SADAMITSU, K., SEKINE, S., AND YAMAMOTO, M. 2008. Sentiment analysis based on probabilistic models using inter-sentence information. In Proceedings of the 6th International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).
42. STRAPPARAVA, C. AND MIHALCEA, R. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 14: Affective Text. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval). 70-74.
43. VEALE, T. 2004. A Non-Distribution Approach to Polysemy Detection in Wordnet.
44. WALLINGTON, A., AGERRI, R., BARNDEN, J., LEE, M., AND RUMBELL, T. 2008. Affect transfer by metaphor for an intelligent conversational agent. In Proceedings of the LREC Workshop on Sentiment Analysis: Emotion, Metaphor, Ontology and Terminology (EMOT). 102-107.
45. WIEBE, J., WILSON, T., AND CARDIE, C. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Lang. Resource Eval. 39, 2, 165-210. (Pubitemid 43320361)
46. WILSON, T., WIEBE, J., AND HOFFMANN, P. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 354.
47. YU, H. AND HATZIVASSILOGLOU, V. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of EMNLP 3. 129-136.
48. ZHANG, L. 2009. Exploration of affect sensing from speech and metaphorical text. In Learning by Playing. Game-Based Education System Design and Development, 251-262.