Co-constructing a sustainable built environment in the Netherlands-Dynamics and opportunities in an environmental sectoral innovation system

Energy Policy

Volumn 52, Issue , 2013, Pages 628-638

  Faber, Albert ^a,b   Hoppe, Thomas ^c  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Built environment; Energy technologies; System of innovation

Indexed keywords

BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CONSTRUCTION SECTORS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; GREEN ENERGY; HOUSING SECTORS; HOUSING STOCK; INNOVATION SYSTEM; KEY DIMENSIONS; MARKET DEMAND; NETHERLANDS; OVERALL ENERGY EFFICIENCY; QUALITATIVE DATA; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HOUSING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

INNOVATION;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84870662825     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Anderson S.T., Newell R.G. Information programs for technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26:27-50.
2. Arentsen M.J. Environmental governance in a multi-level institutional setting. Energy & Environment 2008, 19(6):779-786.
3. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 1989, 99:116-131.
4. Balthasar A. Energie 2000; Programmwirkungen und Folgerungen aus der Evaluation 2000, Verlag Ruegger, Zurich.
5. Beerepoot, M. (2007). Energy Policy Instruments and Technical Change in the Residential Building Sector. Ph.D. Thesis. TU Delft, Delft.
6. Beerepoot M., Beerepoot N. Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4812-4825.
7. Berkhout F., Smith A., Stirling A. Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability 2004, 48-75. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, K. Green (Eds.).
8. Berkhout P.H.G., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., Muskens J.C. The ex post impact of an energy tax on household energy demand. Energy Economics 2004, 26(3):297-317.
9. Boonekamp, P.G.M. (2005). Improved Methods to Evaluate Realised Energy Savings. Ph.D. Thesis. Utrecht University, Utrecht.
10. Boonekamp P.G.M. Price elasticities, policy measures and actual developments in household energy consumption-a bottom up analysis for the Netherlands. Energy Economics 2007, 29(2):133-157.
11. Bressers H., Bruijn T.de, Lulofs K. Environmental negotiated agreements in the Netherlands. Environmental Politics 2009, 18(1):58-77.
12. Brounen D., Kok N., Menne J. Energy performance certification in the housing market; implementation and valuation in the European Union. Erasmus Real Estate Centre, Rotterdam 2009.
13. CBS (2009a). CBS Statline. http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb/.
14. CBS Duurzame Energie in Nederland 2008 2009, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Den Haag/, Heerlen.
15. Coenen, L. (2006). Faraway, So Close! The Changing Geographies of Regional Innovation. Ph.D.-Thesis. Lund University, Lund.
16. Dalle J.-M. Heterogeneity vs. externalities in technological competition: a tale of possible technological landscapes. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1997, 7:395-413.
17. David P.A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 1985, 75(2):332-337.
18. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 1982, 11:147-162.
19. Ecofys Evaluatie van het klimaatbeleid in de gebouwde omgeving 1995-2002 2004, Ecofys, Utrecht.
20. Edquist C. Systems of innovation, perspectives and challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005, 181-208. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.).
21. EIB Bouw in Beeld 2007 2008, EIB, Amsterdam.
22. Eichholtz P., Kok N., Quigley J.M. Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review 2010, 100(5):2492-2509.
23. Elle M., Van Hoorn T., Moss T., Slob A., Vermeulen W., Van der Waals J.F.M. Rethinking local housing policies and energy planning: the importance of contextual dynamics. Built Environment 2002, 28(1):46-56.
24. Faber A., Frenken K. Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2009, 76(4):462-470.
25. Fisher A.C., Rothkopf M.H. Market failure and energy policy: a rationale for selective conservation. Energy Policy 1989, 17:397-406.
26. Freeman C. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 1996, 53:27-39.
27. Gann D.M., Salter A.J. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy 2000, 29:955-972.
28. Geels F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems, insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 2004, 33:897-920.
29. Gillingham K., Newell R.G., Palmer K. Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2009, 1:597-620.
30. Hekkert M.P., Suurs R.A.A., Negro S.O., Kuhlmann S., Smits R.E.H.M. Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2007, 74:413-432.
31. Henryson J., Håkansson T., Pyrko J. Energy efficiency in buildings through information-Swedish perspective. Energy Policy 2000, 28(3):169-180.
32. Hoppe, T. (2009). CO2 reductie in de bestaande woningbouw, een beleidswetenschappelijk onderzoek naar ambitie en realisatie. Ph.D. Thesis. Twente University, Enschede.
33. Hoppe T., Lulofs K. The impact of multi-level governance on energy performance in the current Dutch housing stock. Energy & Environment 2008, 19(6):819-830.
34. Hoppe T., Bressers J.T.A., Lulofs K. Energy conservation in Dutch housing renovation projects. The Social and Behavioural Aspects of Climate Change; Linking Vulnerability, Adaptation and Mitigation 2010, Greenleaf, Sheffield, 68-95. P. Martens, C. Ting Chang (Eds.).
35. Hoppe T., Bressers J, Th.A., Lulofs K.R.D. The practice of innovative energy systems diffusion in neighborhood renovation projects; a comparison of 11 cases in the Netherlands. Green Growth: Strategies and Scenarios for Managing the Transition to Sustainable Capitalism 2012, 265-286. Springer Publishers, Dordecht. D. Vazquez-Brust, J. Sarkis (Eds.).
36. IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2010. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050 2010, OECD/IEA, Paris.
37. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The energy efficiency gap: what does it mean?. Energy Policy 1994, 22:804-810.
38. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation policy. Resource and Energy Economics 1994, 16:91-122.
39. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29:S43-S63.
40. Joossen, S., Harmelink, M., Blok, K. (2004). Evaluatie van het klimaatbeleid in de gebouwde omgeving. Ecofys (report EEP03007), Utrecht.
41. Jordan A., Wurzel R.K.W., Zito A. The rise of 'new' policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government?. Political Studies 2005, 53:477-496.
42. Kemp R., Schot J., Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Niche Management 1998, 10(2):175-195.
43. Lundvall B.A. National Systems of Innovation-Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning 1992, Pinter publishers, London.
44. Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 2002, 21:247-264.
45. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK). F. Malerba (Ed.).
46. Malerba F. Sectoral systems, how and why innovation differs across sectors. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005, 380-406. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson. (Eds.).
47. Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S.G. Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: the role of experimental users and diverse preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2007, 17(4):371-399.
48. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and firm behavior. Industrial and Corporate Change 1993, 2:45-74.
49. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 1997, 6:83-117.
50. Marsili O. The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: TechnologicalChange and Industrial Dynamics 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
51. Ministry of Internal Affairs Cijfers over Wonen, Wijken en Integratie 2010 2010, Department of Infrastructure and the Environment, Den Haag.
52. MNC (2010). Milieu- en Natuurcompendium. http://www.milieuennatuurcompendium.nl/.
53. Nässén J., Holmberg J. Energy efficiency-a forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector?. Energy Policy 2005, 33(8):1037-1051.
54. Nelson R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (MA) and London 1982, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
55. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems-a Comparative Analysis 1993, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
56. Noailly, J. (2010). Improving the Energy Efficiency of Buildings. The Impact of Environmental Policy on Technological Innovation. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB discussion paper no. 137), The Hague.
57. Oltra V., Saint-Jean M. Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2009, 76(4):567-583.
58. Ornetzeder M., Rohracher H. User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy 2006, 34:138-150.
59. Pries F., Dorée A. A century of innovation in the Dutch construction industry. Construction Management and Economics 2005, 23:561-564.
60. Provalis Research (2009). QDA Miner. Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Version 3.2. Provalis, Montreal.
61. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 1962, Free Press, New York.
62. Rohracher H. Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: a socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2001, 13(1):137-150.
63. Saviotti P.-P. On the co-evolution of technologies and institutions. Towards Environmental Innovation Systems 2005, 9-31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. M. Weber, J. Hemmelskamp (Eds.).
64. Schot J., Geels F.W. Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change. A critical survey of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2007, 17(5):605-622.
65. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA).
66. Shove E. Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy 1998, 26(15):1105-1112.
67. Smekens, K.E.L., Kroon, P., and Plomp, A.J. (2011). Actualisatie optiedocument 2010, RR2010-SV en NREAP. ECN (rapportnr. ECN-E-11-023), Petten.
68. Smith A. Alternative technology niches and sustainable development. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice 2004, 6(2):220-235.
69. Stern P.C. Blind spots in policy analysis: what economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1986, 5(2):200-227.
70. Tisdell C., Seidl I. Niches and economic competition: implications for economic efficiency, growth and diversity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2004, 15:119-135.
71. Unruh G.C. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 2000, 28(12):817-830.
72. Van Bueren E., Priemus H. Institutional barriers to sustainable construction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2002, 29:75-86.
73. Van Bueren, E. (2009). Greening Governance. An Evolutionary Approach to Policy Making for a Sustainable Built Environment. Ph.D. Thesis. TU Delft, Delft.
74. Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Stagl S. Co-evolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2003, 13:289-317.
75. Van der Waals J.F.M., Vermeulen W.J.V., Glasbergen P. Carbon dioxide reduction in housing: experiences in urban renewal projects in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2003, 21:411-427.
76. Windrum P., Ciarli T., Birchenhall C. Environmental impact, quality, and price: consumer trade-offs and the development of environmentally friendly technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008, 76:4.
77. Winter S.G. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1984, 5(3-4):287-320.
78. Witt U. Economic growth-what happens on the demand side?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2001, 11(1):1-5.
79. Witt U. The dynamics of consumer behavior and the transition to sustainable consumption patterns. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2011, 1:109-114.