A situational assessment method tor software product management

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Bekkers, Willem ^a   Spruit, Marco ^a   Van De Weerd, Inge ^a   Van Vliet, Rob ^b   Mahieu, Alain ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Centric   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Maturity model; Requirements management; Situational factor; Software product management

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; MATURITY MODEL; REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT; SITUATIONAL FACTORS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84870627444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Abramovici, M., & Soeg, O. (2002). Status and Development Trends of Product Lifecycle Management Systems. Germany: Ruhr-University Bodmin. Chair of IT in Mechanical Engineering (ITM).
2. Appel, W., 2000. Architecture Capability Assessment. In Enteiprise Planning & Architecture Strategies, vol.4, nr.7, METAGroup.
3. Bekkers, W. (2008). Situational Process Improvement in Software Product Management. Utrecht. The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht.
4. Bekkers, W., Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., Mahieu, A. (2008). The Influence of Situational Factors in Software Product Management: Ail Empirical Study.Proceedings of the-ir" International Workshop on Product Management, BmQzXom, Spain. 41-48.
5. Brodman, J. G., & Johnson, D. L. (1994). What Small Businesses and Small Organizations Say About the CMM. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering (pp. 331 - 340). Los Alamitos. CA. USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
6. Clements, P., & Northrop, L. (2001). Software Product Lines: Patterns and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.
7. CMMI Product Team. (2002). Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-012. Pittsburgh. PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
8. Cusamo. (2004). The Business of Software. New York: Free Press.
9. Dahlstedt, A., & Persson, A. (2003). Requirements Interdependencies - Moulding the State of Research into a Research Agenda. Ninth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2003), held in conjunction with CAiSE 2003, (pp. 71- 80). Austria.
10. Ebert, C. (2007). The Impacts of Software Product Management. Journal of Systems and Software, 6 (80). 850-861.
11. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28. 75-105.
12. ISO IEC-15504. (1998). Information Technology - Software Process Assessment. Technical Report - Type 2.
13. Koomen, T., & Baarda, R. (2005). TMap Test Topics. Nederland: Tutein Nolthenius.
14. Kuilboer, J. P., & AshrafL N. (2000). Software process and product improvement: An empirical assessment. Information and Software Technology, 27-34.
15. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Clnissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software (Version 1.1) (SEI/CMU-93-TR-24, ADA263403). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Camesie Mellon University.
16. Reifer, D. J. (2000). The CMMI: it's formidable. Journal of Systems ami Software, 97-98.
17. Steenbergen, M., & Briiikkemper, S. (2007). Ail instrument for the Development of the Enterprise Architecture Practice. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, (pp. 14-22).
18. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, B. (2007. August 4). Design Research in Information Systems. Retrieved December 7. 2007. from AISWorld Net: http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/diisISworld.htm.
19. Weerd, I. v., Briiikkemper, S., & Versendaal, J. (2007). Concepts for Incremental Method Evolution: Empirical Exploration and validation in Requirements Management. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 469-484). Berlin Heidelberg: Verlag.
20. Weerd, I. v., Briiikkemper, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Versendaal, J., & Bijlsma, L. (2006). Towards a Reference Framework for Software Product Mangement. Proc. of the the Nth Int. Requirements Engineering Conference. (pp. 312-315). Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
21. Westbrock, T., 2004. Architecture Process Maturity Revisited and Revised. METAgroup Delta 2902.
22. Zahran. S. (1997). Software Process Improvement: Practical Guidelines for Business Succes. Reading, NLA: Addison-Wesley.