The influence of situational factors in software product management: An empirical study

2008 2nd International Workshop on Software Product Management, ISWPM'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 41-48

  Bekkersa, Willem ^a   Van De Weerda, Inge ^a   Brinkkempera, Sjaak ^a   Mahieub, Alain ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Centric   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MEDIUM-SIZED COMPANIES; METHOD FRAGMENTS; PROCESS MAINTENANCES; SITUATIONAL CONTEXT; SITUATIONAL FACTORS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE PRODUCT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 64849102414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IWSPM.2008.8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bosch, J. (2002). Maturity and Evolution in Software Product Lines: Approaches, Artefacts and Organization. In Software Product Lines (pp. 247-262). Groningen, The Netherlands: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
2. Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology , 38 (4), 275-280.
3. Brodman, J. G., & Johnson, D. L. (1994). What Small Businesses and Small Organizations Say About the CMM. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering (pp. 331 - 340). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
4. Clark, B. K. (2000). Quantifying the Effects of Process Improvement on Effort. IEEE software , 17 (6), 65-70.
5. CMMI Product Team. (2002). Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), Version 1.1, CMU/SEI- 2002-TR-012. Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
6. Condon, D. (2002). Software Product Management - Managing Software Development from Idea to Product to Marketing to Sales. Boston: Aspatore Books.
7. Cusamo. (2004). The Business of Software. New York: Free Press.
8. Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. El Emam, K., & Madhavji, N. H. (1996). Does organizational maturity improve quality. IEEE software , 13 (5), 109-110.
10. Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2000). Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development. Management Science , 4 (46), 451-466.
11. Internet Center for Management and Business Administration, Inc. (sd). Strategic Management. Retrieved 2 14, 2008, van NetMBA Business Knowledge Center: http://www.netmba.com/
12. ISO/IEC-15504. (1998). Information Technology - Software Process Assessment. Technical Report - Type 2.
13. Jacobs, D. (2007). Requirements Engineering So Things Don't Get Ugly. 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 159-160). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
14. Jansen, S. R. (2007). Customer Configuration Updating in a Software Supply Network. Utrecht: Utrecht university.
15. Kuilboer, J. P., & Ashrafi, N. (2000). Software process and product improvement: An empirical assessment. Information and Software Technology , 27-34.
16. Likert, R. (1933). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology (140), 1-55.
17. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software (Version 1.1) (SEI/CMU-93-TR-24, ADA263403). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
18. Purao, S. (2002). Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare. Atlanta: GSU Department of CIS Working Paper.
19. Reifer, D. J. (2000). The CMMI: it's formidable. Journal of Systems and Software , 97-98.
20. Schackmann, H., & Lichter, H. (2006). A Cost-Based Approach to Software Product Line Management. International Workshop on Software Product Management (pp. 13-18). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
21. Vähäniitty, J., Lassenius, C., & Rautiainen, K. (2002). An Approach to Product Roadmapping in Small Software Product Businesses. Quality Connection - 7th European Conference on Software Quality - Conference Notes, (pp. 12-13). Helsinki, Finland.
22. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, B. (2007, August 4). Design Research in Information Systems. Opgeroepen op December 7, 2007, van AISWorld Net: http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm
23. Van Gurp, J., Bosch, J., & Svahnberg, M. (2001). On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines. Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (pp. 45-55). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
24. Weerd van de, I. (2007, 12 20). Reference framework for software product management. Opgeroepen op 2 14, 2008, van IT- and Software Product Management: http://www.softwareproductmanagement.org/
25. Weerd, I. v., Brinkkemper, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Versendaal, J., & Bijlsma, L. (2006). On the Creation of a Reference Framework for Software Product Management: Validation and Tool Support. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Product Management, (pp. 3-12). Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
26. Weerd, I. v., Souer, J., Versendaal, J., & Brinkkemper, S. (2005). Situational Requirements Engineering of Web Content Management Implementations. International Workshop on Situational Requirements Engineering Processes: Methods, Techniques and Tools to Support Situation-Specific Requirements Engineering Processes (pp. 13-30). Paris: University of Limerick.
27. Weerd, I. v., Versendaal, J., & Brinkkemper, S. (2006). A product software knowledge infrastructure for situational capability maturation: Vision and case studies in product management. Twelfth Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, (pp. 97-112). Luxembourgh.
28. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 3rd). Beverly Hills, California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
29. Zahran, S. (1998). Software Process Improvement: Practical Guidelines for Business Succes. Readeing, MA: Addison-Wesley.