Moses - Method for selecting senior mobile phones: Supporting design & choice for the elderly

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 277-285

  Van Dyk, Tobie ^a   Renaud, Karen ^b   Van Biljon, Judy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Checklist; Elderly; Mobile phone choice; Usability

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; ELDERLY; INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS; INTERFACE DESIGNERS; MOBILE AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; MOBILE-PHONE USERS; OLDER ADULTS; OPTIMAL SETS; SUPPORTING DESIGN; USABILITY;

DESIGN; MOBILE DEVICES; MOBILE PHONES; TELEPHONE SETS;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES;

EID: 84870621934     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Abascal, J., & Civit, A. 2001. Universal access to mobile telephony as a way to enhance the autonomy of elderly people. Paper presented at the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, New York.
2. Adams, A. S., Soumerai, S. B., Lomas, J., & RossDegnan, D. 1999. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int Journal of Quality in Health Care, 11(3), 187-192. (Pubitemid 29302446)
3. Buchan, B. J., Dennis, M. L., Tims, F. M., & Diamond, G. S. 2002. Cannabis use: consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing. Addiction. Special Issue: Treatment of Marijuana Disorders., 97, 98-108. (Pubitemid 36009096)
4. Conci, M., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. 2009. Useful, Social and Enjoyable: Mobile Phone Adoption by Older People Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5726/2009, pp. 63-76).
5. Darroch, I., Goodman, J., Brewster, S. A., & Gray, P. D. 2005. The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction - Interact 2005, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
6. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. 1993. Human-Computer Interaction: Prentice Hall.
7. Förster, F., Moser, C., & Tscheligi, M. 2012. A Toolset to Inspire an Experience-Centered Design of Mobile Phones for Older Users., from http://di.ncl.ac.uk/uxmessage/files/2012/05/6-Foerste r.pdf
8. Gawande, A. 2009. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right: Metropolitan Books.
9. Gelderblom, J. H., Van Dyk, T. J., & Van Biljon, J. A. 2010. Mobile phone adoption: Do existing models adequately capture the actual usage of older adults? In P. Kotze, A. Gerber, A. Van der Merwe & N. Bidwell (Eds.), Fountains of Computing Research, Proceedings of SAICSTT 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists. Bela Bela, South Africa, October 2010. (pp. 67-74): ACM International Conference Proceedings Series.
10. George, J. F. 2002. Influences on the intent to make Internet purchases. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy., 12(2), 165-180.
11. Hagen, P., Robertson, T., Kan, M., & Sadler, K. 2005. Emerging research methods for understanding mobile technology use. Paper presented at the OZCHI 2005.
12. Heo, J., & Ham, D. 2009. A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors. Interacting with Computers, 21, 263-275.
13. Hoober, S., & Berkman, E. 2012. Designing Mobile Interfaces. Sebastapol: O'Reilly Media.
14. Ji, Y. G., Park, J. H., Lee, C., & Yun, M. H. 2006. A Usability Checklist for the Usability Evaluation of Mobile Phone User Interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(3), 207-231. (Pubitemid 44077174)
15. Jones, M., & Marsden, G. 2006. Mobile Interaction Design. England: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Junger-Tas, J., & Marshall, I. H. 1999. The SelfReport Methodology. Crime Research Crime and Justice., 25, 291-367.
17. Kallio, T., & Kekalainen, A. 2004. Improving the effectiveness of mobile application design: User-pairs testing by non-professionals. Lectures Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3160, pp. 315-319).
18. Keevil, B. 1998. Measuring the usability index of your Web site. Paper presented at the SIGDOC 98, New York.
19. Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. 2003. A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods. Paper presented at the Mobile HCI 2003, Heidelberg.
20. Kumiawan, S. 2006. An exploratory study of how older women use mobile phones. Paper presented at the UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, New York.
21. Kumiawan, S., & Zaphiris, P. 2005. ResearchDerived Web Design Guidelines for Older People. Paper presented at the ASSETS'05, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
22. Maguire, M., & Osman, Z. 2003. Designing for older inexperienced mobile phone users. Paper presented at the HCI International 2003, New Jersey.
23. O'Connell, T. A. 2007. The Why and How of Seniorfocused Design. In J. Lazar (Ed.), Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Phillips, L., & Sternthal, B. 1977. Age differences in information processing: a perspective on the aged consumer. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(2), 444-457.
25. Reid, R., & Brown, S. 1996. I hate shopping! An introspective perspective. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management., 24(4), 4-16.
26. Renaud, K., & van Biljon, J. 2008. Predicting Technology Acceptance by the Elderly: A qualitative study. Paper presented at the SAICSIT 2008, George, South Africa.
27. Research, P. 2012. Assessing the Representativeness of Public Opinion Surveys., from http://www.peoplepress.org/2012/05/15/assessing- therepresentativeness-of-public-opinionsurveys/?src=prc-newsletter
28. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. 1993. Subjective Well-Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self-Report and Non-Self-Report Measures. Journal of Personality., 61(3), 317-342.
29. Savage, S. L., & Danzinger, J. 2009. The Flaw of Averages: Why We Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty.: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Siek, K. A. 2008. Mobile Design for Older Adults. In J. Lumsden (Ed.), Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology (Vol. I): IGI Global.
31. van Biljon, J., & Renaud, K. 2008. A Qualitative Study of the Applicability of Technology Acceptance Models to Senior Mobile Phone Users. Paper presented at the Workshops ER2008 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Barcelona, Spain.
32. Van Biljon, J. A., Van Dyk, T. J., & Gelderblom, H. 2010. Mobile phone adoption: Optimising value for older adults in a developing country. In J. Steyn (Ed.), 4th International IDIA Development Informatics Conference. 2-4 November 2010. Cape Town, South Africa: IDIA, Monash University ISBN - 978-0-620-47590-7
33. Van den Berg, M., Botha, A., Krause, C., Tolmay, J. P., & van Zyl, P. 2008. Mobiled: A step backwards to look ahead. Paper presented at the Conference on Mobile Learning: From Text to Context, Shropshire, United Kingdom.
34. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. 1977. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research., 3(3), 250-257.
35. Yuan, Y., & Zhang, J. J. 2003. Towards and appropriate business model for m-commerce. Mobile communications, 1(1-2), 35-56.