A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 207-231

  Ji, Yong Gu ^a   Park, Jun Ho ^b   Lee, Cheol ^b   Yun, Myung Hwan ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; HEURISTIC EVALUATION; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; MOBILE-PHONE USERS; USABILITY EVALUATION; USABILITY PROBLEMS;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE DEVICES; MOBILE PHONES; USER INTERFACES;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 33746032222     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc2003_3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beck, E. T., Christiansen, M. K., Kjeldskov, J., Kolbe, N., & Stage, J. (2003). Experimental evaluation of techniques for usability testing of mobile systems in a laboratory setting. In S. Viller & P. Wyeth (Eds.), Proceedings of OZCHI 2003 Conference (pp. 106-115). Brisbane, Australia: CHISIG.
2. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In E. Soloway, D. Frye, & S. B. Sheppard (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 213-218). New York: ACM Press.
3. Constantine, L. L. (1994). Collaborative usability inspections for software. Proceedings of the Software Development'94. San Francisco: Miller Freeman.
4. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (1998). Human-computer interaction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Hartson, H. R., Andre, T. S., & Williges, R. C. (2001). Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 373-410.
6. Jeffries, R., & Desurvire, H. (1992). Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: Was there a contest? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 39-41.
7. Jokela, T. (2004). When good things happen to bad products: Where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? Interactions, 11, 28-35.
8. Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., & Karukka, M. (2003). The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: Analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 53-60). New York: ACM Press.
9. Kallio, T., & Kekalainen, A. (2004). Improving the effectiveness of mobile application design: User-pairs testing by non-professionals. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, 3160, 315-319.
10. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14, 39-48.
11. Kies, J. K., Williges, R. C., & Rosson, M. B. (1998). Coordinating computer-supported cooperative work: A review of research issues and strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 776-779.
12. Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003). A review of mobile HCI research methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2795, 317-335.
13. Klockar, T., Carr D. A., Hedman, A., Johansson, T., & Bengtsson, F. (2003). Usability of mobile phones. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommucation, 197-204.
14. Lauessen, S., & Younessi, H. (1998). Six styles for usability requirements. In P. Dubois, A. L. Opdahl, & K. Pohl (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations of Software Quality (pp. 1-12).
15. Law, E. L., & Hvannberg, E. T. (2002). Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test: A case study of UNIVERSAL brokerage platform. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 71-80). New York: ACM Press.
16. Law, E. L., & Hvannberg, E. T. (2004). Analysis of strategies for improving and estimating the effectiveness of heuristic evaluation. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 241-250). New York: ACM Press.
17. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristics evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25-62). New York: Wiley.
18. Paddison, C., & Englefield, P. (2003). Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 126-133). New York: ACM Press.
19. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design. New York: Wiley.
20. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing. New York: Wiley.
21. Scholtz, J. (2004). Usability evaluation. Retrieved October 13, 2005, from http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/IADpapers/2004/Usability%20Evaluation_revl.pdf
22. Simeral, E. J., & Branaghan, R. J. (1997). A comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods. Proceedings of Society for Technical Communication 44th Annual Conference (pp. 307-309).
23. Treu, S. (1994). User interface evaluation: A structured approach. New York: Plenum.