Non-linear petrov-galerkin methods for reduced order hyperbolic equations and discontinuous finite element methods

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 234, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 540-559

  Fang, F ^a   Pain, C C ^a   Navon, I M ^b   Elsheikh, A H ^a   Du, J ^a,c   Xiao, D ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Finite element; Petrov Galerkin; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Reduced order modelling; Shock wave

Indexed keywords

ADVECTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GALERKIN METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

FINITE ELEMENT; ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; PETROV-GALERKIN; PETROV-GALERKIN APPROACH; PETROV-GALERKIN METHODS; PROPER ORTHOGONAL; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; REDUCED ORDER MODELLING; REDUCED-ORDER MODEL; SHOCK-WAVES;

SHOCK WAVES;

EID: 84870571331     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. F. Fang, C.C. Pain, I.M. Navon, M.D. Piggott, G.J. Gorman, P. Allison, A.J.H. Goddard, Reduced order modelling of an adaptive mesh ocean model, Int. J.Numer. Methods Fluids 59 (8) (2009) 827-851.
2. I. Hoteit, A. Kohl, Efficiency of reduced-order, time-dependent adjoint data assimilation approaches, J. Oceanogr. 62 (4) (2006) 539-550.
3. P.T.M. Vermeulen, A.W. Heemink, Model-reduced variational data assimilation, Mon. Wea. Rev. 134 (2006) 2888-2899.
4. C. Robert, E. Blayo, J. Verron, J. Blum, F.X. Le Dimet, Reduced-order 4d-var: a preconditioner for the incremental 4d-var data assimilation method, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 (2006). pp. L18609-1-4.
5. A.C. Antoulas, Approximation of Large-scale Dynamical Systems, Book Series: Advances in Design and Control, DC 06, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2005.
6. M. Rewienski, J. White, A trajectory piecewise-linear approach to model order reduction and fast simulation of nonlinear circuits and micromachined devices, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 22 (2) (2003) 155-170.
7. K. Willcox, J. Peraire, Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA J. 40 (11) (2002) 2323-2330.
8. F. Bassi, S. Rebay, A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 131 (1997) 267-279.
9. M.Bergmann, C.H. Bruneau, A. Iollo, Enablers for robust POD models, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2) (2009) 516-538.
10. F. Fang, C.C. Pain, I.M. Navon, M.D. Piggott, G.J. Gorman, P. Allison, A.J.H. Goddard, A POD reduced order unstructured mesh ocean modelling method for moderate Reynolds number flows, Ocean Model. 28 (1-3) (2009) 127-136.
11. A.Iollo, S. Lanteri, J.A. Desideri, Stability properties of POD-Galerkin approximations for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 13 (2000) 377-396.
12. B.Galletti, C.H. Bruneau, L.Zannetti, A. Iollo, Low-order modelling of laminar flow regimes past a confined square cylinder, J. Fluid Mech. 503 (2004)161-170.
13. B. Kragel, Streamline Diffusion POD Models in Optimization, Dissertation, Fachbereich IV Universit ät Trier, 2005.
14. B.R. Noack, M. Schlegel, B. Ahlborn, G. Mutschke, M. Morzyński, P. Comte, G. Tadmor, A finite-time thermodynamics of unsteady flows, J. Non-equilib. Thermodyn. 33 (2) (2009) 103-148.
15. N.C. Nguyen, J. Peraire, An efficient reduced-order modeling approach for non-linear parametrized partial differential equations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 76 (2008) 27-55.
16. K. Carlberg, C. Bou-Mosleh, C. Farhat, Efficient non-linear model reduction via a least-squares Petrov-Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 86 (2011) 155-181.
17. P. Bochev, M. Gunzburger, Least Squares Finite Element Methods, Springer, Berlin, 2009.
18. Chris Homescu, I.M. Navon, Optimal control of flow with discontinuities, J. Comput. Phys. 187 (2003) 660-682.
19. A.G. Buchan, S.R. Merton, C.C. Pain, R.P. Smedley-Stevenson, Riemann boundary conditions for the Boltzmann transport equation using arbitrary angular approximations, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 1186-1195.
20. J. Donea, A. Huerta, Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2003.
21. G.A. Sod, Survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 27 (1978) 1-31.
22. A. Iollo, Remarks on the Approximation of the Euler Equations by a Low Order Model, INRIA, Report of research, RR-3329, 1997.
23. B.R. Noack, R. Papas, P. Monkewitz, The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 523 (2005) 339-366.
24. B.R. Noack, K. Afanasiev, M. Morzyński, G. Tadmor, F. Thiele, A hierarchy of low-dimensional models of the transient and post-transient cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 497 (2003) 335-363.
25. B.R. Noack, M. Schlegel, M. Morzyński, G. Tadmor, System reduction strategy for Galerkin models of fluid flows, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 63 (2)(2010) 231-248.
26. Z. Wang, I. Akhtar, J. Borggaard, T. Iliescu, Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: a numerical comparison, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 237-240 (2012) 10-26.
27. E.F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, A Practical Introduction, third ed., Springer, Berlin, 2009.
28. C.C. Pain, M.D. Eaton, R.P. Smedley-Stevenson, A.J.H. Goddard, M.D. Piggott, C.R.E. de Oliveira, Streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin methods for the steady-state Boltzmann transport equation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2006) 4448-4472.