Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: A numerical comparison

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 237-240, Issue , 2012, Pages 10-26

  Wang, Zhu ^a   Akhtar, Imran ^b   Borggaard, Jeff ^a   Iliescu, Traian ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Dynamic subgrid scale model; Large eddy simulation; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Reduced order modeling; Turbulence; Variational multiscale model

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC SUBGRID-SCALE MODEL; KINETIC ENERGY SPECTRA; MEAN VELOCITIES; MIXING LENGTH; NUMERICAL COMPARISON; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITIONS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; REDUCED-ORDER MODELING; REYNOLDS STRESS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE VALUES; SUBGRID SCALE; TIME EVOLUTIONS; VARIATIONAL MULTISCALE; VELOCITY FLUCTUATIONS;

CIRCULAR CYLINDERS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84861554455     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ito K., Ravindran S.S. A reduced-order method for simulation and control of fluid flows. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 143:403-425.
2. Graham W.R., Peraire J., Tang K.Y. Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models. Part II - model-based control. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1999, 44:973-990.
3. Cohen K., Siegel S., McLaughlin T., Gillies E. Feedback control of a cylinder wake low-dimensional model. AIAA J. 2003, 41:1389-1391.
4. Bergmann M., Cordier L., Brancher J. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17:097101.
5. O. Lehmann, M. Luchtenburg, B.R. Noack, R. King, M. Morzyński, G. Tadmor, Wake stabilization using POD Galerkin models with interpolated modes, in: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2005.
6. J. Hoepffner, E. Akervik, U. Ehrenstein, D.S. Henningson, Control of cavity-driven separated boundary layer, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Active Flow Control, Berlin, 2006.
7. Bagheri S., Brandt L., Henningson D. Input-output analysis model reduction and control of the flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 620:263-298.
8. Barbagallo A., Sipp D., Schmid P. Closed-loop control of an open cavity flow using reduced-order models. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 641:1-50.
9. Ahuja S., Rowley C.W. Feedback control of unstable steady states of flow past a flat plate using reduced-order estimators. J. Fluid Mech. 2010, 645:447-478.
10. Akhtar I., Nayfeh A.H. Model based control of laminar wake using fluidic actuation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2010, 5:041015.
11. Luo Z., Zhu J., Wang R., Navon I.M. Proper orthogonal decomposition approach and error estimation of mixed finite element methods for the tropical Pacific Ocean reduced gravity model. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2007, 196:4184-4195.
12. Daescu D.N., Navon I.M. A dual-weighted approach to order reduction in 4DVAR data assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev. 2008, 136:1026-1041.
13. Fang F., Pain C.C., Navon I.M., Piggott M.D., Gorman G.J., Farrell P.E., Allison P.A., Goddard A.J.H. A POD reduced-order 4D-Var adaptive mesh ocean modelling approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2009, 60:709-732.
14. Holmes P., Lumley J.L., Berkooz G. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry 1996, Cambridge.
15. Sirovich L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Parts I-III. Quart. Appl. Math. 1987, 45:561-590.
16. Aubry N., Holmes P., Lumley J.L., Stone E. The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1988, 192:115-173.
17. Podvin B., Lumley J. A low-dimensional approach for the minimal flow unit. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 362:121-155.
18. Podvin B. On the adequacy of the ten-dimensional model for the wall layer. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13:210-224.
19. Galletti B., Bruneau C.H., Zannetti L., Iollo A. Low-order modelling of laminar flow regimes past a confined square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 503:161-170.
20. Couplet M., Basdevant C., Sagaut P. Calibrated reduced-order POD-Galerkin system for fluid flow modelling. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 207:192-220.
21. Buffoni M., Camarri S., Iollo A., Salvetti M.V. Low-dimensional modelling of a confined three-dimensional wake flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 569:141-150.
22. Iollo A., Dervieux A., Désidéri J.A., Lanteri S. Two stable POD-based approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Comput. Visual. Science 2000, 3:61-66.
23. Iollo A., Lanteri S., Désidéri J.A. Stability properties of POD-Galerkin approximations for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2000, 13:377-396.
24. Fang F., Pain C.C., Navon I.M., Gorman G.J., Piggott M.D., Allison P.A., Farrell P.E., Goddard A.J.H. A POD reduced order unstructured mesh ocean modelling method for moderate Reynolds number flows. Ocean Model. 2009, 28:127-136.
25. Z. Wang, Reduced-order modeling of complex engineering and geophysical flows: analysis and computations, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Tech, 2012.
26. Bergmann M., Bruneau C.H., Iollo A. Enablers for robust POD models. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:516-538.
27. Noack B.R., Schlegel M., Ahlborn B., Mutschke G., Morzynski M., Comte P., Tadmor G. A finite-time thermodynamics of unsteady fluid flows. J. Non-Equil. Thermodyn. 2008, 33:103-148.
28. Noack B.R., Schlegel M., Morzyński M., Tadmor G. System reduction strategy for Galerkin models of fluid flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2010, 63:231-248.
29. Noack B.R., Morzynski M., Tadmor G. Reduced-Order Modelling for Flow Control 2011, vol. 528. Springer Verlag.
30. Rempfer D., Fasel H.F. Dynamics of three-dimensional coherent structures in a flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1994, 275:257-283.
31. Rempfer D. Investigations of boundary layer transition via Galerkin projections on empirical eigenfunctions. Phys. Fluids 1996, 8:175.
32. Cazemier W., Verstappen R., Veldman A. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows. Phys. Fluids 1998, 10:1685.
33. Ma X., Karniadakis G.E. A low-dimensional model for simulating three-dimensional cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2002, 458:181-190.
34. Sirisup S., Karniadakis G.E. A spectral viscosity method for correcting the long-term behavior of POD models. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 194:92-116.
35. B.R. Noack, P. Papas, P.A. Monkewitz, Low-dimensional Galerkin model of a laminar shear-layer, Technical Report 2002-01, école Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2002.
36. Noack B.R., Afanasiev K., Morzynski M., Tadmor G., Thiele F. A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 497:335-363.
37. Noack B.R., Papas P., Monkewitz P.A. The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 523:339-365.
38. S. Ullmann, J. Lang, A POD-Galerkin reduced model with updated coefficients for Smagorinsky LES, in: J.C.F. Pereira, A. Sequeira (Eds.), V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, Portugal.
39. Hay A., Borggaard J., Pelletier D. Local improvements to reduced-order models using sensitivity analysis of the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 629:41-72.
40. Hay A., Borggaard J., Akhtar I., Pelletier D. Reduced-order models for parameter dependent geometries based on shape sensitivity analysis. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229:1327-1352.
41. Carlberg K., Bou-Mosleh C., Farhat C. Efficient non-linear model reduction via a least-squares Petrov-Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2011, 86:155-181.
42. Sagaut P. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Scientific Computation 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. third edition.
43. Couplet M., Sagaut P., Basdevant C. Intermodal energy transfers in a proper orthogonal decomposition - Galerkin representation of a turbulent separated flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 491:275-284.
44. Barrault M., Maday Y., Nguyen N.C., Patera A.T. An 'empirical interpolation' method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 2004, 339:667-672.
45. Chaturantabut S., Sorensen D.C., Steven J.C. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2010, 32:2737-2764.
46. Chaturantabut S., Sorensen D.C. A state space error estimate for POD-DEIM nonlinear model reduction. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2012, 50:46-63.
47. Willcox K. Unsteady flow sensing and estimation via the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition. Comput. Fluids 2006, 35:208-226.
48. Galbally D., Fidkowski K., Willcox K., Ghattas O. Non-linear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large-scale inverse problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2010, 81:1581-1608.
49. Dickinson B.T., Singler J.R. Nonlinear model reduction using group proper orthogonal decomposition. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 2010, 7:356-372.
50. Wang Z., Akhtar I., Borggaard J., Iliescu T. Two-level discretizations of nonlinear closure models for proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Comput. Phys. 2011, 230:126-146.
51. Smagorinsky J.S. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon. Weather Rev. 1963, 91:99-164.
52. Germano M., Piomelli U., Moin P., Cabot W. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 1991, 3:1760-1765.
53. Meneveau C., Lund T., Cabot W. A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1996, 319:353-385.
54. Porté-Agel F., Meneveau C., Parlange M.B. A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2000, 415:261-284.
55. Hughes T.J.R., Mazzei L., Jansen K.E. Large eddy simulation and the variational multiscale method. Comput. Vis. Sci. 2000, 3:47-59.
56. Akhtar I., Nayfeh A.H., Ribbens C.J. On the stability and extension of reduced-order Galerkin models in incompressible flows. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2009, 23:213-237.
57. J. Borggaard, A. Duggleby, A. Hay, T. Iliescu, Z. Wang, Reduced-order modeling of turbulent flows, in: Proceedings of MTNS 2008.
58. Podvin B. A proper-orthogonal-decomposition-based model for the wall layer of a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:015111.
59. Hughes T.J.R., Mazzei L., Oberai A., Wray A. The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation: decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13:505-512.
60. Hughes T.J.R., Oberai A., Mazzei L. Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13:1784-1799.
61. Bazilevs Y., Calo V.M., Cottrell J.A., Hughes T.J.R., Reali A., Scovazzi G. Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2007, 197:173-201.
62. Layton W.J. A connection between subgrid scale eddy viscosity and mixed methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 2002, 133:147-157.
63. Guermond J.-L. Stabilization of Galerkin approximations of transport equations by subgrid modeling, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 1999, 33:1293-1316.
64. John V., Kaya S. A finite element variational multiscale method for the Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2005, 26:1485.
65. John V., Kindl A. A variational multiscale method for turbulent flow simulation with adaptive large scale space. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229:301-312.
66. T. Iliescu, Z. Wang, Variational multiscale proper orthogonal decomposition: convection-dominated convection-diffusion-reaction equations, Math. Comput., in press.
67. Vasilyev O., Goldstein D. Local spectrum of commutation error in large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16:470-473.
68. Vasilyev O., Lund T., Moin P. A general class of commutative filters for LES in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 146:82-104.
69. Berselli L.C., Iliescu T., Layton W.J. Mathematics of large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Scientific Computation 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
70. I. Akhtar, Parallel simulations, reduced-order modeling and feedback control of vortex shedding using fluidic actuators, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Tech, 2008.
71. Morinishi Y., Vasilyev O. Vector level identity for dynamic subgrid scale modeling in large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 2002, 14:3616.
72. Zang Y., Street R., Koseff J. A non-staggered grid, fractional step method for time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 114:18-33.
73. Leonard B.P. A stable and accurate convective modeling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1979, 19:59-98.
74. Chorin A.J. A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 135:118-125.
75. Kim J., Moin P. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes. J. Comput. Phys. 1985, 59:308-323.
76. Orszag S.A., Kells L.C. Transition to turbulence in plane Poiseuille and plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1985, 96:159-205.
77. Street C.L., Hussaini M.Y. A numerical solution of the appearance of chaos in finite length Taylor-Couette flow. Appl. Numer. Math. 1991, 6:123-139.
78. Norberg C. An experimental investigation of the flow around a circular cylinder: influence of aspect ratio. J. Fluid Mech. 1994, 258:287-316.
79. Evangelinos C., Karniadakis G.E. Dynamics and flow structures in the turbulent wake of rigid and flexible cylinders subject to vortex-induced vibrations. J. Fluid Mech. 1999, 400:91-124.