Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English of advanced German learners

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 44, Issue , 2011, Pages 79-100

  Götz, Sandra ^a,b   Schilk, Marco ^a,b  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870514813     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.44.05sch     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
2. Brand, C. & Kämmerer, S. 2006. The Louvian International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, S. Braun, K. Kohn & J. Mukherjee (eds), 127-140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
3. De Cock, S. 2000. Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), C. Mair & M. Hundt (eds), 51-68. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
4. De Cock, S., Granger, S. & Petch-Tyson, S. 2006. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage - LINDSEI. (14 August 2009).
5. Esser, J. 2006. Presentation in Language: Rethinking Speech and Writing. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
6. Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. 2010. The Louvain Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-La-Neuve: Presses universities de Louvain.
7. Görlach, M. 1991. Englishes: Studies in Varieties of English 1984 - 1988. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Götz, S. 2007. Performanzphänomene in gesprochenem Lernerenglisch: Eine korpusbasierte Pilotstudie. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung 18(1): 67-84.
9. Gries, S.Th. & Mukherjee. J. 2010. Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of n-grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520-548.
10. Hasselgren, A. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 237-260.
11. Jucker, A.H., Smith, S.W. & Lüdge, T. 2003. Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737-1769.
12. Kachru, B.B. 1996. World Englishes: Agony and ecstasy. Journal of Aesthetic Education 30(2): 135-155.
13. Kachru, B.B. 1983. The Indianization of English: The English Language in India. New Delhi: OUP.
14. Mair, C. 2007. British English/American English grammar: Convergence in writing - divergence in speech. Anglia 125(1): 84-100.
15. McArthur, T. 2003. World English, Euro English, Nordic English? English Today 19(1): 54-58.
16. Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R.M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP.
17. Müller, S. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Nelson, G., Wallis, S. & Aarts, B. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English [Varieties of English around the World G29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Nesselhauf, N. 2009. Co-selection phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide 30(1): 1-26.
20. Nihalani, P, Tongue, R.K., Hosali, P. & Crowther, J. 2004. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation, 2nd edn. New Dehli: OUP.
21. Pawley, A. & Syder, F. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J. Richards & R. Schmidt (eds), 191-226. London: Longman.
22. Peters, A.M. 1983. The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
23. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
24. Schmitt, N., Grandage, S. & Adolphs, S. 2004. Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In Formulaic Sequences [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], N. Schmitt (ed.), 127-152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Scott, M. 1998. WordSmith Tools. Version 4.00. Oxford: OUP.
26. Sinclair, J.M. 1991. Corpus Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
27. Sridhar, K.K. & Sridhar, S.N. 1986. Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes 5(1): 3-14.
28. Weinert, R. 1995. The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Ap-plied Linguistics 16(2): 180-205.
29. Wiktorsson, M. 2001. Register differences between prefabs in native and EFL English. In The Department of English in Lund: Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 1, S. Manninen & C. Paradis (eds), 85-94. Lund: Lund University Press.
30. Williams, J. 1987. Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition. English World-Wide 8(2): 161-199.
31. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.