Identifying and collecting pertinent medical records for centralized abstraction in a multi-center randomized clinical trial: The model used by the American College of Radiology arm of the National Lung Screening Trial

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 36-44

  Gareen, Ilana F ^a   Sicks, JoRean D ^a   Jain, Amanda Adams ^a   Moline, Denise ^b   Coffman Kadish, Nancy ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Care Communications   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstracting; Clinical trials; Lung cancer; Medical records; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MEDICAL SOCIETY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

COMPUTER SECURITY; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL RECORDS; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; RADIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84870514249     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: 15592030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chen Z., Kooperberg C., Pettinger M.B., et al. Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials. Menopause 2004, 11:264-274.
2. Lubeck D.P., Hubert H.B. Self-report was a viable method for obtaining health care utilization data in community-dwelling seniors. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:286-290.
3. Ives D.G., Fitzpatrick A.L., Bild D.E., et al. Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol 1995, 5:278-285.
4. Bergmann M.M., Byers T., Freedman D.S., Mokdad A. Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults. Am J Epidemiol May 15 1998, 147(10):969-977.
5. Heckbert S.R., Kooperberg C., Safford M.M., et al. Comparison of self-report, hospital discharge codes, and adjudication of cardiovascular events in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 2004, 160:1152-1158.
6. Sarrazin M.S., Rosenthal G.E. Finding pure and simple truths with administrative data. JAMA Apr. 4 2012, 307(13):1433-1435.
7. Pignone M., Scott T.L., Schild L.A., Lewis C., Vázquez R., Glanz K. Yield of claims data and surveys for determining colon cancer screening among health plan members. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Mar. 2009, 18(3):726-731.
8. Schneeweiss S., Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol Apr. 2005, 58(4):323-337.
9. Katz J.N., Chang L.C., Sangha O., Fossel A.H., Bates D.W. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review?. Med Care Jan. 1996, 34(1):73-84.
10. Mukerji S.S., Duffy S.A., Fowler K.E., Khan M., Ronis D.L., Terrell J.E. Comorbidities in head and neck cancer: agreement between self-report and chart review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Apr. 2007, 136(4):536-542.
11. O'Malley K.J., Cook K.F., Price M.D., Wildes K.R., Hurdle J.F., Ashton C.M. Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res Oct. 2005, 40(5 Pt 2):1620-1639. [PubMed PMID: 6178999; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1361216].
12. Curb J.D., McTiernan A., Heckbert S.R., et al. WHI Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative. Ann Epidemiol 2003, 13:S122-S128.
13. Partin M.R., Burgess D.J., Halek K., Grill J., Vernon S.W., Fisher D.A., et al. Randomized trial showed requesting medical records with a survey produced a more representative sample than requesting separately. J Clin Epidemiol 2008 Oct, 61(10):1028-1035.
14. Ness R.B. Joint Policy Committee, Societies of Epidemiology. Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research. JAMA 2007, 298:2164-2170.
15. McWilliams R., Hoover-Fong J., Hamosh A., et al. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA 2003, 290:360-366.
16. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011, 365:395-409.
17. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle D.R., Adams A.M., Berg C.D., et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:1771-1779.
18. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle D.R., Berg C.D., Black W.C., et al. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011, 258:243-253.
19. O'Brien B., Nichaman L., Browne J.E., et al. Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project Team. Coordination and management of a large multicenter screening trial: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials 2000, 21:310S-328S.
20. Geiger A.M., Greene S.M., Pardee R.E., Hart G., Herrinton L.J., Macedo A.M., et al. A computerized system to facilitate medical record abstraction in cancer research (United States). Cancer Causes Control Jun. 2003, 14(5):469-476.