Evolving use case maps as a scenario and workflow description language

Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Requirements Engineering, WER 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 56-67

  Mussbacher, Gunter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; ASSESSMENT METHODS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS DESIGN; BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION LANGUAGE; BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION LANGUAGE FOR WEB SERVICES; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; COMMUNICATION PATTERN; DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; SCENARIO DESCRIPTION; UML 2.0; USE CASE MAPS; WORKFLOW LANGUAGE;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; WEB SERVICES;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84870465751     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Abdelaziz, T., Elammari, M., and Unland, R.: "Visualiz-ing a Multiagent-Based Medical Diagnosis System Using a Methodology Based on Use Case Maps". Multiagent System Technologies (editors Lindemann-v. Trzebiatowski, G., Denzinger, J., Timm, I.J., and Unland, R.). LNCS 3187, Springer, September 2004, pp 198-212. (Pubitemid 41049487)
2. Amyot, D. and Logrippo, L.: "Use Case Maps and LOTOS for the Prototyping and Validation of a Mobile Group Call System". Computer Communication. Vol. 23(12). July 2000, pp 1135-1157.
3. Amyot, D., Charfi, L., Gorse, N., Gray, T., Logrippo, L., Sincennes, J., Stepien, B., and Ware, T.: "Feature Descrip-tion and Feature Interaction Analysis with Use Case Maps and LOTOS". Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VI. Glasgow, Scotland, UK, May 2000, IOS Press, pp 274-289.
4. Amyot, D., Roy, J.-F., and Weiss. M.: "UCM-Driven Testing of Web Applications". SDL 2005: Model Driven (editors Prinz A., Reed R., and Reed J.). LNCS 3530, Springer, June 2005, pp 247-264. (Pubitemid 41422155)
5. Amyot, D., Weiss, M., and Logrippo L.: "UCM-Based Generation of Test Purposes". Computer Networks. Vol. 49(5), December 2005, pp 643-660.
6. Amyot, D.: "Introduction to the User Requirements Nota-tion: Learning by Example". Computer Networks. Vol. 42(3), 21 June 2003, pp 285-301.
7. Andrade, R.: "Applying Use Case Maps and Formal Methods to the Development of Wireless Mobile ATM Net-works". Lfm2000: Fifth NASA Langley Formal Methods Workshop. Williamsburg, VA, USA, June 2000, pp 151-162.
8. Billard, E.A.: "Operating system scenarios as Use Case Maps". ACM Workshop on Software and Performance. 2004, pp. 266-277.
9. Buhr, R.J.A. and Casselman, R.S.: Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. Prentice-Hall, 1996.
10. Buhr, R.J.A.: "Use Case Maps as Architectural Entities for Complex Systems". IEEE Transactions on Software En-gineering. Vol. 24(12). December 1998, pp 1131-1155. (Pubitemid 128741299)
11. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) website; accessed April 2007: http://www.bpmn.org.
12. Elammari, M. and Lalonde, W.: "An Agent-Oriented Methodology: High-Level View and Intermediate Models". 1st International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems (AOIS). Heidelberg, Germany, June 1999.
13. Gottschalk, K., Graham, S., Kreger, H., and Snell, J.: "Introduction to Web Services Architecture". IBM Systems Journal. Vol. 41(2), 2002, pp 170-177.
14. IBM WebSphere Software website; accessed April 2007: http://www.ibm.com/ websphere.
15. Roy, J.-F. Kealey, and Amyot, D.: "Towards Integrated Tool Support for the User Requirements Notation". SAM 2006: Language Profiles - Fifth Workshop on System Analy-sis and Modelling. Kaiserslautern, Germany. LNCS 4320, pp. 198-215, Springer (2006); accessed April 2007: http://www. softwareengineering.ca/jucmnav.
16. Kiepuszewski, B.: Expressiveness and Suitability of Languages for Control Flow Modelling in Workflows. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Aus-tralia, 2003.
17. Microsoft BizTalk Server website; accessed April 2007: http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/default.mspx.
18. Mussbacher, G., Amyot, D., and Weiss M.: "Visualizing Early Aspects with Use Case Maps". To appear in Transac-tions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development.
19. OMG. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. OMG Formal Specification, formal/05-07-04, July 2005; acc. April 2007: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc? formal/05-07-04.
20. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Infor-mation Standards (OASIS) Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL) Technical Committee (TC); accessed April 2007: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc- home.php?wg-abbrev=wsbpel.
21. Petriu, D.B. and Woodside, M.: "Software Performance Models from System Scenarios in Use Case Maps". Com-puter Performance Evaluation (editors Field T., Harrison P.G., Bradley J., and Harder U.). LNCS 2324, Springer, April 2002, pp 141-158.
22. Ruh, W.A., Maginnis, F.X., and Brown, W.J.: Enterprise Application Integration - A Wiley Tech Brief. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2001.
23. Schofield, J.: "The third era starts here". Guardian Unlimited Technology. May 29, 2003; accessed April 2007: http://technology.guardian.co.uk/ online/story/0, 3605, 965532, 00.html.
24. Siddiqui, K.H. and Woodside, C.M.: "Performance aware software development (PASD) using resource demand budgets". Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP). Rome, Italy, July 2002, pp 275-285.
25. Simple Object Access Protocol website; accessed April 2007: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap.
26. Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration web-site; accessed April 2007: http://www.uddi.org.
27. URN - Goal-oriented Requirement Language (GRL), ITU-T Draft Recommendation Z.151. Geneva, Switzerland, Sep. 2003; acc. April '07: http://www.UseCaseMaps.org/urn.
28. URN - Use Case Map Notation (UCM), ITU-T Draft Recommendation Z.152. Geneva, Switzerland, Sep. 2003; accessed April 2007: http://www.UseCaseMaps.org/ urn.
29. User Requirements Notation (URN) - Language Re-quirements and Framework, ITU-T Recommendation Z.150. Geneva, Switzerland, February 2003; acc. April 2007: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/publications/recs.html.
30. Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B. and Barros, A.P.: "Workflow Patterns". Distributed and Parallel Databases. Vol 14(3), July 2003, pages 5-51.
31. Web Services Description Language website; accessed April 2007: http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
32. Weiss, M. and Amyot, D.: "Business Process Modeling with URN". International Journal of E-Business Research. Vol. 1(3), July-September 2005, pp 63-90.
33. White, S.A.: "Process Modeling Notations and Work-flow Patterns". Workflow Handbook 2004 (editor: Fischer, L.). Future Strategies Inc., 2004, pp 265-294; acc. April '07: http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/ NotationsandWorkflowPatterns.pdf.
34. Wohed, P., Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M. and ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: "Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages: The Case of BPEL4WS". Proceedings 22nd Intl. Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER). Chicago IL, USA, October 13-16, 2003, pp. 200-215.
35. Wohed, P., Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., and Russell, N.: "Pattern-based Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams". BETA Working Paper Series. WP 129, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2004; accessed April 2007: http://is.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/ download/uml2patternsBETATR.pdf.
36. Workflow Patterns website; accessed April 2007: http://www. workflowpatterns.com.
37. YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language website; accessed April 2007: http://yawlfoundation.org/.