Insights into bone metabolism of avian embryos in ovo via 3D and 4D 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 688-698

  Würbach, Lydia ^a   Heidrich, Alexander ^a   Opfermann, Thomas ^a,c   Gebhardt, Peter ^a   Saluz, Hans Peter ^a,b  

^a HANS KNÖLL INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^c JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

18F fluoride; Avian embryo; Bone metabolism; In ovo; MicroPET

Indexed keywords

FLUORINE 18; TRACER;

ARTICLE; BONE METABOLISM; BONE STRUCTURE; CATHETERIZATION; CHICK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGG; EMBRYO; FOUR DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; NONHUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; CHICK EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INJECTIONS; OVUM; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOACTIVE TRACERS; RADIONUCLIDE ANGIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

ANIMALIA; AVES; RODENTIA; SPONDIAS PURPUREA;

EID: 84870436202     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0550-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Rashidi H, Sottile V (2009) The chick embryo: hatching a model for contemporary biomedical research. Bioessays 31(4):459-465
2. Darnell DK, Schoenwolf GC (1999) The chick embryo as a model system for analyzing mechanisms of development. Methods Mol Biol 135:25-29
3. Deryugina EI, Quigley JP (2008) Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model systems to study and visualize human tumor cell metastasis. Histochem Cell Biol 130(6):1119-1130
4. Glover JC, Boulland JL, Halasi G, Kasumacic N (2009) Chimeric animal models in human stem cell biology. ILAR J 51(1):62-73
5. Härtl A, Sauerbrei A, Stelzner A, Wutzler P (2004) Influenza infection of the embryonated hen's egg/an alternative model for in vivo evaluation of antiviral compounds. Arzneimittelforschung 54(2):130-134
6. Zhu L, van de Lavoir M-C, Albanese J, Beenhouwer DO, Cardarelli PM, Cuison S et al (2005) Production of human monoclonal antibody in eggs of chimeric chickens. Nat Biotechnol 23(9):1159-1169
7. Stern CD (2005) The chick: a great model system becomes even greater. Dev Cell 8(1):9-17
8. Cook ME (2000) Skeletal deformities and their causes: introduction. Poult Sci 79(7):982-984
9. Brugmann SA, Powder KE, Young NM, Goodnough LH, Hahn SM, James AW et al (2010) Comparative gene expression analysis of avian embryonic facial structures reveals new candidates for human craniofacial disorders. Hum Mol Genet 19(5):920-930
10. Balke M, Neumann A, Kersting C, Agelopoulos K, Gebert C, Gosheger G et al (2010) Morphologic characterization of osteosarcoma growth on the chick chorioallantoic membrane. BMC Res Notes 3:58
11. Kulesa PM, Bailey CM, Cooper C, Fraser SE (2010) In ovo live imaging of avian embryos. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. doi:10.1101/ pdb.prot5446
12. Bain MM (2007) Noninvasive monitoring of chick development in ovo using a 7 T MRI system from day 12 of incubation through to hatching. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(1):198-201
13. Li X, Liu J, Davey M, Duce S, Jaberi N, Liu G et al (2007) Micromagnetic resonance imaging of avian embryos. J Anat 211(6):798-809
14. Hogers B, van der Weerd L, Olofsen H, van der Graaf LM, DeRuiter MC, Gittenberger-de Groot AC et al (2008) Non-invasive tracking of avian development in vivo by MRI. NMR Biomed 22(4):365-373
15. Duce S, Morrison F, Welten M, Baggott G, Tickle C (2011) Micromagnetic resonance imaging study of live quail embryos during embryonic development. Magn Reson Imaging 29(1):132-139
16. Heidrich A, Würbach L, Opfermann T, Saluz HP (2011) Motionartifact-free in vivo imaging utilizing narcotized avian embryos in ovo. Mol Imaging Biol 13(2):208-214
17. Henning AL, Jiang MX, Yalcin HC, Butcher JT (2011) Quantitative three-dimensional imaging of live avian embryonic morphogenesis via micro-computed tomography. Dev Dyn 240(8):1949-1957
18. Webb DR (1987) Thermal tolerance of avian embryos: a review. Condor 89(4):874-898
19. Cook GJ, Lodge Ma, Blake GM, Marsden PK, Fogelman I (2000) Differences in skeletal kinetics between vertebral and humeral bone measured by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):763-769
20. Blake GM, Park-Holohan SJ, Cook GJ, Fogelman I (2001) Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. Semin Nucl Med 31(1):28-49
21. Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, Davis RT, Alavi A, Treves ST (2008) Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med 49(1):68-78
22. Derlin T, Wisotzki C, Richter U, Apostolova I, Bannas P, Weber C et al (2011) in vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: correlation with atherogenic risk factors. J Nucl Med 52(3):362-368
23. Vaquero JJ, Desco M, Pascau J, Santos A, Seidel J, Green MV (2001) PET, CT, and MR image registration of the rat brain and skull. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 48(4):1440-1445
24. Berger F, Lee Y-P, Loening A, Chatziioannou A, Freedland S, Leahy R et al (2002) Whole-body skeletal imaging in mice utilizing microPET: optimization of reproducibility and applications in animal models of bone disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(9):1225-1236
25. Hsu WK, Virk MS, Feeley BT, Stout DB, Chatziioannou AF, Lieberman JR (2008) Characterization of osteolytic, osteoblastic, and mixed lesions in a prostate cancer mouse model using 18F-FDG and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med 49(3):414-421
26. Dyke JP, Aaron RK (2010) Noninvasive methods of measuring bone blood perfusion. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1192(1):95-102
27. Blau M, Ganatra R, Bender MA (1972) 18F-fluoride for bone imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2(1):31-37
28. Czernin J, Satyamurthy N, Schiepers C (2010) Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition. J Nucl Med 51(12):1826-1829
29. Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Flusser G, Zuriel L, Kollender Y, Lerman H et al (2004) Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45(2):272-278
30. Frost ML, Blake GM, Cook GJR, Marsden PK, Fogelman I (2009) Differences in regional bone perfusion and turnover between lumbar spine and distal humerus: 18F-fluoride PET study of treatment-naïve and treated postmenopausal women. Bone 45(5):942-948
31. Hawkins RA, Choi Y, Huang SC, Hoh CK, Dahlbom M, Schiepers C et al (1992) Evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of fluorine-18-fluoride ion with PET. J Nucl Med 33(5):633-642
32. Tazawa H (1981) Measurement of blood pressure of chick embryo with an implanted needle catheter. J Appl Physiol 51(4):1023-1026
33. Wilson SM, Chambers AF (2004) Experimental metastasis assays in the chick embryo. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 21:19.6.1-19.6.25.
34. Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Slump CH, Boerman OC, Oyen WJG et al (2010) Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon smallanimal PET scanner. J Nucl Med 51(4):610-617
35. Visser EP, Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJG et al (2009) Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon smallanimal PET scanner. J Nucl Med 50(1):139-147
36. Wang Y, Dur O, Patrick MJ, Tinney JP, Tobita K, Keller BB et al (2009) Aortic arch morphogenesis and flow modeling in the chick embryo. Ann Biomed Eng 37(6):1069-1081
37. Doh ST, Hao H, Loh SC, Patel T, Tawil HY, Chen DK et al (2010) Analysis of retinal cell development in chick embryo by immunohistochemistry and in ovo electroporation techniques. BMC Dev Biol 10:8
38. Shapiro F (1992) Vertebral development of the chick embryo during days 3-19 of incubation. J Morphol 213(3):317-333
39. Bellairs R, Osmond M (2005) Plate 148-150. In: The atlas of chick development. London: Elsevier Academic Press, pp 406-409
40. Starck JM (1996) Comparative morphology and cytokinetics of skeletal growth in hatchlings of altricial and precocial birds. Zool Anz 235(1):53-75
41. Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Jo S-K, Sato N, Saga T, Hiraga A et al (2002) Renal tubular damage detected by dynamic micro-MRI with a dendrimer-based magnetic resonance contrast agent. Kidney Int 61 (6):1980-1985
42. Lewis JS, Achilefu S, Garbow JR, Laforest R, Welch MJ (2002) Small animal imaging. current technology and perspectives for oncological imaging. Eur J Cancer 38(16):2173-2188
43. Azhdarinia A, Ghosh P, Ghosh S, Wilganowski N, Sevick-Muraca EM (2011) Dual-labeling strategies for nuclear and fluorescence molecular imaging: a review and analysis. Mol Imaging Biol (in press)
44. Chen K, Li Z-B, Wang H, Cai W, Chen X (2008) Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(12):2235-2244
45. Tufan AC, Lale Satiroglu-Tufan N (2005) The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model system for the study of tumor angiogenesis, invasion and development of anti-angiogenic agents. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 5(4):249-266
46. Schmidt G, Figueiredo E, Saatkamp M, Bomm E (2009) Effect of storage period and egg weight on embryo development and incubation results. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 11(1):1-5
47. Hamburger V, Hamilton H (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88(1):49-92
48. Schellpfeffer M, Bolender DL, Kolesari GL (2007) High frequency ultrasound imaging of the growth and development of the normal chick embryo. Ultrasound Med Biol 33(5):751-761