Optimization of prostate cancer diagnosis by increasing the number of core biopsies based on gland volume

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 892-899

  Werahera, Priya N ^a   Sullivan, Kathryn ^b   La Rosa, Francisco G ^a   Kim, Fernando J ^c   Lucia, M Scott ^a   O'Donnell, Colin ^d   Sidhu, Rameshwar S ^a   Sullivan, Holly T ^a   Schulte, Beth ^c   David Crawford, E ^d  

^a The University of Colorado Denver   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Prostate gland volume; PSA; Transrectal core biopsies

Indexed keywords

KALLIKREIN; KALLIKREIN RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN; KALLIKREIN-RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; IMMUNOLOGY; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; UNITED STATES;

BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; COLORADO; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; KALLIKREINS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; ORGAN SIZE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84870430053     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19362625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 212-236.
2. Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 2005; 12 Suppl 1: 44-48.
3. Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, Lucia MS, Goodman PJ, Crowley JJ, Parnes HL, Coltman CA Jr. Operating characteristics of prostatespecific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA 2005; 294: 66-70.
4. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2239-2246.
5. Montironi R, Mazzuccheli R, Scarpelli M, Lopez-Beltran A, Fellegara G, Algaba F. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies. BJU Int 2005; 95: 1146-1152.
6. Raja J, Ramachandran N, Munneke G, Patel U. Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 142-153.
7. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71-74.
8. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K, Troncoso P, Sweet J, Evans R, Johnston D, Chen M. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 152-157.
9. Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163-166.
10. de laTaille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, Cherfan M, Porcher R, Hoznek A, Saint F, Vordos D, Cicco A, Yiou R, Zafrani ES, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2003; 61: 1181-1186.
11. Crawford ED, Hirano D, Werahera PN, Lucia MS, DeAntoni EP, Daneshgari F, Brawn PN, Speights VO, Stewart JS, Miller GJ. Computer modeling of prostate biopsy: tumor size and location--not clinical significance-determine cancer detection. J Urol 1998; 159: 1260-1264.
12. Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995; 45: 2-12.
13. Ochiai A and Babaian RJ. Update on prostate biopsy technique. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 157-162.
14. Kawata N, Miller GJ, Crawford ED, Torkko KC, Stewart JS, Lucia MS, Miller HL, Hirano D, Werahera PN. Laterally directed biopsies detect more clinically threatening prostate cancer: computer simulated results. Prostate 2003; 57: 118-128.
15. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, and Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155: 607-609.
16. Presti JC Jr. Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? Urol Oncol 2003; 21: 135-140.
17. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, Schulman C, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 1309-1322.
18. Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 2003; 169: 125-129.
19. Karakiewicz PI, Bazinet M, Aprikian AG, Trudel C, Aronson S, Nachabe M, Peloquint F, Dessureault J, Goyal MS, Begin LR, Elhilali MM. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997; 49: 55-59.
20. Inahara M, Suzuki H, Kojima S, Komiya A, Fukasawa S, Imamoto T, Naya Y, Ichikawa T. Improved prostate cancer detection using systematic 14-core biopsy for large prostate glands with normal digital rectal examination findings. Urology 2006; 68: 815-819.
21. McNeal J. Origin and development of carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1969; 23: 24.
22. Barqawi AB and Crawford ED. The current use and future trends of focal surgical therapy in the management of localized prostate cancer. Cancer J 2007; 13: 313-317.
23. Crawford ED, Wilson SS, Torkko KC, Hirano D, Stewart JS, Brammell C, Wilson RS, Lucia MS, Werahera PN. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2005; 96: 999-1004.