Update on prostate biopsy technique

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 157-162

  Ochiai, Atsushi ^a   Babaian, R Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Prostate; Technique

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME; ULTRASOUND; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

BIOPSY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 2342641633     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200405000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:71-75.
2. Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, et al. The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology 1995; 46:831-836.
3. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1907; 157:199-203.
4. Keetch DW, Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol 1994; 151:1571-1574.
5. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K, et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163:152-157.
6. Stewart CS, Leibovi BC, Weaver AL, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 2001; 166:86-92.
7. Presti JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163:163-167.
8. Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1996; 46:2-12.
9. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston D, et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol 1997; 158:2168-2175.
10. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159:471-476.
11. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnson D, et al. Prostate cancer detection: relationship to prostate size. Urology 1999; 53:764-768.
12. Huland H, Hammerer P, Henke RP, et al. Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma with digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen and the result of 6 systematic biopsies. J Urol 1996; 155:1344-1347.
13. Borirakchanyavat S, Bhargava V, Shinohara K, et al. Systematic sextant biopsies in the prediction of extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997; 50:373-378.
14. Linson PW, Lee AK, Doytchinova T, et al. Percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer does it add to the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting postoperative prostate-specific antigen outcome for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer? Urology 2002; 59:704-708.
15. Ravery V, Chastang C, Toublanc M, et al. Percentage of cancer on biopsy cores accurately predicts extracapsular extension and biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy for T1-T2 prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000; 37:449-455.
16. Egawa S, Suyama K, Matsumoto M, et al. Improved predictability of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle involvement based on clinical and biopsy findings in prostate cancer in Japanese men. Urology 1998; 52:433-440.
17. Rubin MA, Bassiry N, Sanda K, et al. Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24:183-189.
18. Miller DC, Hafez KS, Stewart A, et al. Prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis and staging. An update from the national cancer data base. Cancer 2003; 98:1169-1178. An excellent clinical survey of prostate carcinoma in the United States. This contemporary report provides a nationwide pattern of cancer care and outcomes.
19. Kawsta N, Miller GJ, Crawford ED, et al. Laterally directed biopsies detect more clinically threatening prostate cancer computer simulated results. Prostate 2003; 57:118-128. An interesting report evaluates the efficacy of laterally directed biopsies using the simulation of computer models of the prostate.
20. Emiliozzi P, Corsettti A, Tassi B, et al. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology 2003; 61:961-966. This report provides a unique approach to lateraly directed biopsies to detect cancers.
21. O'Connell MJ, Smith CS, Fitzpatrick PE, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland: value of 12 versus 6 cores. Abdom Imaging 2003 Oct 28 [Epub ahead of print]. An interesting report evaluates the biopsy schemes taken only from the lateral aspect of the prostate.
22. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Pytel A, et al. One 10-core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies. Br J Urol Int 2003; 92:385-388. An interesting report evaluates the extended biopsy methods that have been introduced previously.
23. Presti JC, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, et al. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimizes variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 2003; 169:125-129. An excelent report to practice extended biopsies in a large number of patients performed by community-based urologists. This report provides the optimal biopsy scheme by PSA and age.
24. Damiano R. Autorino R, Perdona S, et al. Are extended biopsies really necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Prost Cancer Prost Dis 2003; 6:250-255. An interesting report provides the optimal extended biopsy scheme based on their original scheme.
25. Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, et al. Prospective evaluation of a 21 sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2003; 61:1181-1186. An interesting report demonstrates the role of an increasing number of biopsies in extended biopsy for the detection of cancer.
26. Ung JO, Sanfrancisco IF, Regan MM, et al. The relationship of prostate gland volume to extended needle biopsy on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2003; 169:130-135. An excellent report evaluates the influence of prostate volume for the detection of cancers. This report describes the essential argument on the point of cancer detection in men with large prostates.
27. Basillote JB, Armenakas NA, Hochberg DA, et al. Influence of prostate volume in the detection of prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61:167-171. An interesting report demonstrates the influence of prostate volume for cancer detection on repeat biopsy.
28. Remzi M, Djavan B, Wammack R, et al. Can total and transition zone volume of the prostate determine whether to perform a repeat biopsy? Urology 2003; 61:161-166. An interesting study demonstrates the characteristica of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsies.
29. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Esterbauer B, et al. Evaluation of transition zone and lateral sextant biopsies for prostate cancer detection after initial sextant biopsy. Urology 2003; 61:748-753. An interesting report evaluates the efficacy of laterally directed biopsies and TZ biopsies on repeat biopsy.
30. Quinn DI, Henshall SM, Brenner PC, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2003; 97:1884-1893. An excellent report provides the evidence that PSA, the Gleason sum and the percentage of positive cores are predictors of the pathological outcome. This report also evaluates the prognostic predictors.
31. The Search Database Study Group. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is a significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from the search database. J Urol 2003; 169:2136-2141. An excelent report demonstrates the importance of the percentage of positive cores for predicting the pathological outcome. This report also gives the predictors for prognosis.
32. Gancarczyk KJ, Wu H, McLeod DG, et al. Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and higheat biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the cancer for prostate disease research nomograms. Urology 2003; 61:589-595. An excellent report demonstrates the importance of the percentage of positive cores. This report provides an originally developed probability nomogram using the percentage of positive cores for the prediction of the pathological outcome.
33. The Search Database Study Group. Comparison of percentage of total prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer to percentage of cores with cancer for predicting PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the search database. Urology 2003; 61:742-747. An Interesting report describes the importance of the percentage of tumor in the biopsy tissue to predict the pathological outcome.
34. Bismar TA, Lewis JS, Vollmer RT, et al. Multiple measures of carcinoma extent versus perineural invasion in prosate needle biopsy tissue in prediction of pathologic stage in a screening population. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:432-440. A detailed report based on prostate biopsy tissue for predicting the pathological outcome.
35. Kravchick S, Cytron S, Peled R, et al. Colour Doppler ultrasonography for detecting perineural invasion (PIN) and the value of PIN in predicting final pathological stage: a prospective study of men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Br J Urol Int 2003; 92:28-31.
36. Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, et al. Tolerance of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: risk factors. Prost Cancer Prost Dis 2003; 6:239-241.
37. Damiano R, Oliva A, Cantiello F, et al. Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2003; 75:40-46.
38. Berger AP, Frauscher F, Halpern EJ, et al. Periprostatic administration of local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Urology 2003; 61:585-588. An Interesting report demonstrates the efficacy of anesthesia in full detail on adequate study design.
39. Addla SK, Adeyoju AAB, Holden W. Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol 2003; 43:441-443. An interesting report demonstrates the efficacy of anesthesia in full detail on adequate study design.
40. Matlaga BR, Lovato JF, Hall MC. Randomized prospective trial of a novel local anesthetic technique for extensive prostate biopsy. Urology 2003; 61:972-976. An interesting report evaluates the anesthetic methods of lidocaine.
41. Rodriguez A, Kyriakou G, Laray E. Prospective study comparing two methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: reviews of literature. Eur Urol 2003; 44:195-200.