Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants

Spine Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1060-1066

  De Beer, Neal ^a   Scheffer, Cornie ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Arthroscopy; Intervertebral disc; Medical devices; Patient specific; Rapid manufacturing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE PLATE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK IMPLANT; KYPHOPLASTY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; RISK REDUCTION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; VERTEBRA;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CADAVER; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DISKECTOMY; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLIABILITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTORS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84870427706     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J. Auerbach, C. Ballester, and F. Hammond The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement Spine J 10 2010 333 340
2. M. Gstoettner, D. Heider, M. Liebensteiner, and C. Bach Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty Eur Spine J 17 2008 1470 1475
3. J.S. Tan, C. Bailey, and M. Dvorak Interbody device shape and size are important to strengthen the vertebra-implant interface Spine 30 2005 638 644 (Pubitemid 40388646)
4. T. Lowe, S. Hashim, and L. Wilson A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support Spine 29 2004 2389 2394 (Pubitemid 40353293)
5. T. Steffen, A. Tsantrizos, and M. Aebi Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs Spine 25 2000 1077 1084 (Pubitemid 30317188)
6. T. Kishen, and A. Diwan Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium? Orthop Clin North Am 41 2010 167 181
7. A. Van Ooij, F. Oner, and A. Verbout Complications of artificial disc replacement - a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc J Spinal Disord Tech 16 2003 369 383
8. Bertagnoli R. Complications and rescue strategies in TDR procedures. 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society (NASS); 2005; Philadelphia, PA.
9. S. Leary, J. Regan, T. Lanman, and W. Wagner Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement Spine 32 2007 1001 1011 (Pubitemid 46646767)
10. C. Shim, S. Lee, D. Maeng, and S.H. Lee Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases J Spinal Disord Tech 18 2005 465 469 (Pubitemid 44378143)
11. A. Van Ooij, S. Kurtz, and F. Stessels Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients Spine 32 2007 223 229 (Pubitemid 46105809)
12. G. Cinotti, T. David, and F. Postacchini Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years Spine 21 1996 995 1000 (Pubitemid 26127221)
13. W. Zeegers, L.M. Bohnen, M. Laaper, and M. Verhaegen Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients Eur Spine J 8 1999 210 217 (Pubitemid 29287487)
14. E. Van der Houwen, P. Baron, and A. Veldhuizen Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine Ann Biomed Eng 38 2010 33 40
15. J. Poukens, J. Haex, and D. Riediger The use of rapid prototyping in the preoperative planning of distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillofacial skeleton Comput Aided Surg 8 2003 146 154
16. L.C. Hieu, E. Bohez, and J. Vander Sloten Design for medical rapid prototyping of cranioplasty implants Rapid Prototyping J 9 2003 175 186
17. I. Gibson, L.K. Cheung, and S.P. Chow The use of rapid prototyping to assist medical applications Rapid Prototyping J 12 2006 53 58 (Pubitemid 43164306)
18. T. Sercombe, N. Jones, R. Day, and A. Kop Heat treatment of Ti-6Al-7Nb components produced by selective laser melting Rapid Prototyping J 14 2008 300 304
19. O. Harrysson, Y. Hosni, and J. Nayfeh Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8 2007 91
20. O. Harrysson, O. Cansizoglu, and D. Marcellin-Little Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology Mater Sci Eng C 28 2008 366 373 (Pubitemid 351297809)
21. B. Vandenbroucke, and J.P. Kruth Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts Rapid Prototyping J 13 2007 196 203 (Pubitemid 47174526)
22. R. Schindel, C. Lampert, and W. Gross Case report TALUS: application of selective laser sintering technology in orthopaedics Eur Cell Mater 10 5 Suppl 2005 TM4
23. K. Hasegawa, M. Abe, T. Washio, and T. Hara An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density Spine 26 2001 957 963 (Pubitemid 32373985)