Acoustic cues to size and quality in the vocalizations of male North American bison, Bison bison

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1381-1391

  Wyman, M T ^a   Mooring, M S ^b   McCowan, B ^a   Penedo, M C T ^a   Reby, D ^c   Hart, L A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acoustic; Bison; Formant frequency; Male quality; Sexual selection; Source filter theory; Vocalization

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; BODY SIZE; FITNESS; MALE BEHAVIOR; POLYGYNY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; UNGULATE; VOCALIZATION;

BISON; BISON BISON; BISON BISON BISON; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84870426011     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.037     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Andersson M.B. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Berger J., Cunningham C. Bellows, copulations, and sexual selection in bison (Bison bison). Behavioral Ecology 1991, 2:1-6.
3. Berger J., Peacock M. Variability in size-weight relationships of Bison bison. Journal of Mammalogy 1988, 69:618-624.
4. Boersma P., Weenink D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer 2009, Version 5.1.07, Retrieved 12 May 2009. http://www.praat.org/.
5. Borgreen, M. J. 2010. The reproductive performance of bison at the National Bison Range. M.Sc. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman.
6. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. Principles of Animal Communication 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
7. Briefer E., McElligott A.G. Indicators of age, body size and sex in goat kid calls revealed using the source-filter theory. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2011, 133:175-185.
8. Briefer E., Vannoni E., McElligott A.G. Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal. BMC Biology 2010, 8:35. 10.1186/1741-7007-8-35.
9. Charlton B.D., Reby D., McComb K. Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biology Letters 2007, 3:382-385.
10. Charlton B.D., Zhihe Z., Snyder R.J. The information content of giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, bleats: acoustic cues to sex, age and size. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:893-898.
11. Charlton B.D., Keating J.L., Rengui L., Huang Y., Swaisgood R.R. Female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) chirps advertise the caller's fertile phase. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, 277:1101-1106.
12. Charlton B.D., Keating J.L., Kersey D., Rengui L., Huang Y., Swaisgood R.R. Vocal cues to male androgen levels in giant pandas. Biology Letters 2011, 7:71-74.
13. Charlton B.D., Ellis W.A.H., McKinnon A.J., Cowin G.J., Brumm J., Nilsson K., Fitch W.T. Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait. Journal of Experimental Biology 2011, 214:3414-3422.
14. Charrier I., Ahonen H., Harcourt R.G. What makes an Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) male's bark threatening?. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2011, 125:385-392.
15. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D. The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertising. Behaviour 1979, 69:145-170.
16. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Guinness F.E. Reproductive success in male and female red deer. Reproductive Success 1988, 325-343. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. T.H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.).
17. Espmark Y., Amundsen T., Rosenqvist G. Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication. Trondheim 2000, Tapir Academic Press, Norway.
18. Evans S., Neave N., Wakelin D., Hamilton C. The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiology & Behavior 2008, 93:783-788.
19. Ey E., Pfefferle D., Fischer J. Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review. Primates 2007, 48:253-267.
20. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production 1960, Mouton, The Hague.
21. Feinberg D.R., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies affect the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour 2005, 69:561-568.
22. Fischer J., Kitchen D.M., Seyfarth R.M., Cheney D.L. Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2004, 56:140-148.
23. Fitch W.T. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 102:1213-1222.
24. Fitch W.T. Skull dimensions in relation to body size in nonhuman mammals: the causal bases for acoustic allometry. Zoology 2000, 103:40-58.
25. Fitch W.T. The evolution of speech: a comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:258-267.
26. Fitch W.T., Giedd J. Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106:1511-1522.
27. Fitch W.T., Hauser M.D. Unpacking 'honesty': vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. Acoustic Communication 2002, 65-137. Springer, New York. A. Simmons, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
28. Fitch W.T., Reby D. The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2001, 268:1669-1675.
29. Frey R., Gebler A. The highly specialized vocal tract of the male Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa Pallas, 1777 - Mammalia, Bovidae). Journal of Anatomy 2003, 203:451-471.
30. Frey R., Gebler A., Fritsch G. Arctic roars: laryngeal anatomy and vocalization of the muskox (Ovibos moschatus Zimmermann, 1780, Bovidae). Journal of Zoology 2006, 268:433-448.
31. Frey R., Gebler A., Fritsch G., Nygrén K., Weissengruber G.E. Nordic rattle: the hoarse vocalization and the inflatable laryngeal air sac of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Journal of Anatomy 2007, 210:131-159.
32. Frey R., Volodin I., Volodina E. A nose that roars: anatomical specializations and behavioural features of rutting male saiga. Journal of Anatomy 2007, 211:717-736.
33. Frey R., Gebler A., Olson K.A., Odonkhuu D., Fritsch G., Batsaikhan N., Stuermer I.W. Mobile larynx in Mongolian gazelle: retraction of the larynx during rutting barks in male Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa Pallas, 1777). Journal of Morphology 2008, 269:1223-1237.
34. Frey R., Volodin I., Volodina E., Soldatova N.V., Juldaschev E.T. Descended and mobile larynx, vocal tract elongation and rutting roars in male goitred gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa Güldenstaedt, 1780). Journal of Anatomy 2011, 218:566-585.
35. Fujimura O., Lindqvist J. Sweep-tone measurements of vocal tract characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:541-558.
36. Ghazanfar A.A., Turesson H.K., Maier J.X., van Dinther R., Patterson R.D., Logothetis N.K. Vocal-tract resonances as indexical cues in rhesus monkeys. Current Biology 2007, 17:425-430.
37. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1990, 144:517-546.
38. Hamilton W.D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?. Science 1982, 218:384-387.
39. Harris T.R., Fitch W.T., Goldstein L.M., Fashing P.J. Black and white colobus monkey (Colobus guereza) roars as a source of both honest and exaggerated information about body mass. Ethology 2006, 112:911-920.
40. Helbig L., Woodbury M.R., Haigh J.C., Barth A.D. The onset of puberty in North American bison (Bison bison) bulls. Animal Reproduction Science 2007, 97:12-24.
41. Hewitt G., MacLarnon A., Jones K.E. The functions of laryngeal air sacs in primates: a new hypothesis. Folia Primatologica 2002, 73:70-94.
42. Kingswood S.C., Blank D.A. Gazella subgutturosa. Mammalian Species 1996, 518:1-10.
43. Kitchen D.M., Seyfarth R.M., Fischer J., Cheney D.L. Loud calls as indicators of dominance in male baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 53:374-384.
44. Klose S.M., Welbergen J.A., Kalko E.K.V. Testosterone is associated with harem maintenance ability in free-ranging grey-headed flying-foxes, Pteropus poliocephalus. Biology Letters 2009, 5:758-761.
45. Komers P.E., Messier F., Gates C.C. Search or relax: the case of bachelor wood bison. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1992, 31:192-203.
46. Koren L., Geffen E. Complex call in male rock hyrax (Procavia capensis): a multi-information distributing channel. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2009, 63:581-590.
47. Lieberman P., Blumstein S.E. Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Lott D.F. Sexual and aggressive behaviour of bison. The Behaviour of Ungulates in Relation to Management 1974, 382-394. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Morges, Switzerland. V. Geist, F. Walther (Eds.).
49. Lott D.F. Dominance relations and breeding rate in mature male American bison. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1979, 49:418-432.
50. Lott D.F. Sexual behavior and inter sexual strategies in American bison, Bison bison. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1981, 56:97-114.
51. Lott D.F., Galland J.C. Body mass as a factor influencing dominance status in American bison cows. Journal of Mammalogy 1987, 68:683-685.
52. McElligott A.G., Birrer M., Vannoni E. Retraction of the mobile descended larynx during groaning enables fallow bucks (Dama dama) to lower their formant frequencies. Journal of Zoology 2006, 270:340-345.
53. McHugh T. Social behavior of the American buffalo (Bison bison bison). Zoologica 1958, 43:1-40.
54. Mooring M.S., Patton M.L., Lance V.A., Hall B.M., Schaad E.W., Fortin S.S., Jella J.E., McPeak K.M. Fecal androgens of bison bulls during the rut. Hormones and Behavior 2004, 46:392-398.
55. Mooring M.S., Patton M.L., Reisig D.D., Osborne E.R., Kanallakan A.L., Aubery S.M. Sexually dimorphic grooming in bison: the influence of body size, activity budget and androgens. Animal Behaviour 2006, 72:737-745.
56. Morton E.S. Occurrence and significance of motivation structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist 1977, 111:855-869.
57. Nishimura T., Mikami A., Suzuki J., Matsuzawa T. Descent of the hyoid in chimpanzees: evolution of face flattening and speech. Journal of Human Evolution 2006, 51:244-254.
58. Nowak R.M. Walker's Mammals of the World 1999, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 6th edn.
59. Owren M.J. GSU Praat Tools: scripts for modifying and analyzing sounds using Praat acoustics software. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:822-829.
60. Owren M.J., Seyfarth R.M., Cheney D.L. The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:2951-2963.
61. Pfefferle D., Fischer J. Sound and size: identification of variables that reflect body size in hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas. Animal Behaviour 2006, 72:43-51.
62. Pisanski K., Rendall D. The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2011, 129:2201-2212.
63. Preston B.T., Stevenson I.R., Pemberton J.M., Wilson K. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 2001, 409:681-682.
64. Puts D.A., Hodges C.R., Cárdenas R.A., Gaulin S.J. Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007, 28:340-344.
65. R Development Core Team R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
66. Reby D., McComb K. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behaviour 2003, 65:519-530.
67. Reby D., McComb K., Cargnelutti B., Darwin C., Fitch W.T., Clutton-Brock T. Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2005, 272:941-947.
68. Reby D., Charlton B., Locatelli Y., McComb K. Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, 277:2747-2753.
69. Rendall D., Owren M.J., Weerts E., Hienz R.J. Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 115:411-421.
70. Riede T., Fitch W.T. Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog Canis familiaris. Journal of Experimental Biology 1999, 202:2859-2867.
71. Roden C., Vervaecke H., Van Elsacker L. Dominance, age and weight in American bison males (Bison bison) during non-rut in semi-natural conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2005, 92:169-177.
72. Rubenstein D.I., Hack M.A. Horse signals: the sounds and scents of fury. Evolutionary Ecology 1992, 6:254-260.
73. Rutberg A.T. Factors influencing dominance status in American bison cows (Bison bison). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1983, 63:206-212.
74. Rutberg A.T. Dominance and its fitness consequences in American bison cows. Behaviour 1986, 96:62-91.
75. Sancristobal-Gaudy M., Renand G., Amigues Y., Boscher M.Y., Levéziel H., Bibé B. Individual traceability of bovine meat using molecular markers. Productions Animales 2000, 13:269-276.
76. Sanvito S., Galimberti P., Miller E.H. Vocal signalling of male southern elephant seals is honest but imprecise. Animal Behaviour 2007, 73:287-299.
77. Taylor A.M., Reby D. Contribution of the source-filter theory to the study of mammal vocal communication. Journal of Zoology 2010, 280:221-236.
78. Taylor A.M., Reby D., McComb K. Human listeners attend to size information in domestic dog growls. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 123:2903-2909.
79. Taylor A.M., Reby D., McComb K. Why do large dogs sound more aggressive to human listeners: acoustic bases of motivational misattributions. Ethology 2010, 116:1155-1162.
80. Titze I.R. Principles of Voice Production 1994, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
81. Vannoni E., McElligott A.G. Low frequency groans indicate larger and more dominant fallow deer (Dama dama) males. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3113. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003113.
82. Vehrencamp S.L. Handicap, index, and conventional signal elements of bird song. Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication 2000, 277-300. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway. Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen, G. Rosenqvist (Eds.).
83. Vervaecke H., Roden C., De Vries H. Dominance, fatness and fitness in female American bison, Bison bison. Animal Behaviour 2005, 70:763-770.
84. Weissengruber G.E., Forstenpointner G., Peters G., Kubber-Heiss A., Fitch W.T. Hyoid apparatus and pharynx in the lion (Panthera leo), jaguar (Panthera onca), tiger (Panthera tigris), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and domestic cat (Felis silvestris f. catus). Journal of Anatomy 2002, 201:195-209.
85. Wolff J.O. Breeding strategies, mate choice, and reproductive success in American bison. Oikos 1998, 83:529-544.
86. Wyman M.T., Mooring M.S., McCowan B., Penedo M.C.T., Hart L.A. Amplitude of bison bellows reflects male quality, physical condition and motivation. Animal Behaviour 2008, 76:1625-1639.
87. Yin S., McCowan B. Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Animal Behaviour 2004, 68:343-355.
88. Zahavi A. Mate selection a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1975, 53:205-214.
89. Zahavi A., Zahavi A. The Handicap Principle: a Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
90. Zielinski W.J., Vandenbergh J.G. Testosterone and competitive ability in male house mice, Mus musculus: laboratory and field studies. Animal Behaviour 1993, 45:873-891.